Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jul-Aug;37(4):639-652. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9352.
This review aimed to summarize the current literature on the oral biofilm formation on alternative abutment materials compared with titanium (Ti) or Ti alloy in clinical and in situ conditions.
An electronic database search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, LIVIVO, BVS, ProQuest, and OpenGrey up to November 2020. Clinical and in situ studies evaluating the biofilm formed on metallic, ceramic, or polymeric abutment materials compared with Ti or Ti alloy were included. Outcome measures were microbial counts/profile, cell viability, and biofilm coverage/thickness. Clinical parameters were deemed secondary outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed by RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools.
A total of 10 clinical and 9 in situ studies were included. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity across studies. The abutment materials polytetrafluoroethylene, gold alloy, gold-platinum alloy, cobalt-chromium, alumina, and zirconia were reported. Six out of ten clinical studies (60%) and four out of nine in situ studies (44%) found no qualitative or quantitative microbiologic differences between tested materials. When significant differences were detected, conflicting results were reported. Clinical outcomes were consistent with healthy conditions for all investigated materials.
There is not enough evidence to support the existence of relevant microbiologic differences in the biofilm formed on alternative abutment materials over Ti and its alloys in oral conditions. No evident relationship between microbiologic results and clinical outcomes were found. In situ studies and polymicrobial analyses showed a higher tendency to find significant differences between materials.
本综述旨在总结目前关于替代基台材料在临床和原位条件下与钛(Ti)或 Ti 合金相比形成口腔生物膜的文献。
对 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science、LIVIVO、BVS、ProQuest 和 OpenGrey 数据库进行了电子数据库检索,检索时间截至 2020 年 11 月。纳入了评估金属、陶瓷或聚合物基台材料与 Ti 或 Ti 合金相比形成的生物膜的临床和原位研究。研究结果为微生物计数/分布、细胞活力和生物膜覆盖/厚度。临床参数被视为次要结果。通过 RoB 2 和 ROBINS-I 工具评估偏倚风险。
共纳入 10 项临床研究和 9 项原位研究。由于研究之间存在异质性,因此未进行荟萃分析。报道的基台材料有聚四氟乙烯、金合金、金铂合金、钴铬、氧化铝和氧化锆。在 10 项临床研究中有 6 项(60%)和 9 项原位研究中有 4 项(44%)发现,在测试材料之间没有定性或定量的微生物学差异。当检测到显著差异时,报告了相互矛盾的结果。所有研究的临床结果都与口腔健康状况一致。
没有足够的证据支持替代基台材料在口腔条件下形成的生物膜与 Ti 及其合金相比存在相关的微生物学差异。未发现微生物学结果与临床结果之间存在明显关系。原位研究和多微生物分析显示,材料之间存在显著差异的趋势更高。