Beidahuang Kenfeng Seed, 380 Changjiang Road, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, PR China.
Beidahuang Kenfeng Seed, 380 Changjiang Road, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang, PR China.
Plant Sci. 2022 Oct;323:111400. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111400. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
CRISPR Cas9-mediated genome editing is highly efficient at targeted site-specific gene knock-out through NHEJ (Non-Homology End Joining), but ineffective for specific DNA integration through HDR (Homology Directed Repair) for precise gene editing. Base editors can make limited base substitutions but only within restricted small windows of the protospacer. Prime editing has been applied in plants with various degrees of success. However, several questions such as low and inconsistent editing efficiencies across different target sites need to be addressed. We compared two prime editing approaches PE3 and PE2 at two neighboring target sites within rice Waxy gene to partially address those questions. A straightforward PE2 plant prime editing system retrofitted from a regular CRISPR-Cas9 editing system can deliver highly efficient up to 66.7% precise gene editing. Various forms of precise editing including base substitutions, small deletions and insertions can be accurately achieved. The secondary structure variations of different pegRNAs may be the primary reason for inconsistent editing across different target sites and should be the optimization focus to further improve plant prime editing.
CRISPR Cas9 介导的基因组编辑通过非同源末端连接 (NHEJ) 在靶向特定基因敲除方面非常高效,但通过同源定向修复 (HDR) 进行特定 DNA 整合进行精确基因编辑的效率却很低。碱基编辑器可以进行有限的碱基替换,但只能在原间隔区的有限小窗口内进行。Prime editing 已在植物中得到了不同程度的应用。然而,仍然需要解决一些问题,例如在不同靶位点的编辑效率低且不一致。我们在水稻蜡质基因的两个邻近靶位点比较了两种 Prime editing 方法 PE3 和 PE2,以部分解决这些问题。一种直接从常规 CRISPR-Cas9 编辑系统改装的简单 PE2 植物 Prime editing 系统可以实现高达 66.7%的高效精确基因编辑。可以准确实现各种形式的精确编辑,包括碱基替换、小缺失和插入。不同 pegRNA 的二级结构变化可能是不同靶位点编辑不一致的主要原因,应该是进一步提高植物 Prime editing 的优化重点。