• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利托君用于外倒转术:其有效性和安全性如何?

Ritodrine in external cephalic version: is it effective and safe?

作者信息

Kim Sin Ae, Cha Eun-Hwan, Chun Kyoung-Chul, Kim Young Ah, Koh Jae-Whoan, Han Jung Yeol, Hwang Jong Hee

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Korean Mothersafe Counselling Center, Pregnancy & Breastfeeding Medicines Information Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Sep;65(5):420-429. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22106. Epub 2022 Jul 29.

DOI:10.5468/ogs.22106
PMID:35908652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9483666/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The external cephalic version (ECV) has been shown to lower the likelihood of cesarean section requirements among pregnant women with breech presentations. In the current study, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of ritodrine as a tocolytic for ECV.

METHODS

A total of 407 pregnant women with breech presentations, who had no contraindications for ECV, were enrolled in this study. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of ritodrine use on the safety and efficacy of ECV.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 67.6%, and ritodrine use was associated with significantly higher odds of successful ECV after adjusting for confounders. Moreover, using ritodrine did not increase the risk of adverse effects, including temporary changes in fetal heart rate, need for elective or emergency cesarean section due to fetal distress during ECV, low Apgar scores, and perinatal mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that using ritodrine as a tocolytic during ECV may increase the likelihood of ECV success and may not increase adverse perinatal outcomes.

摘要

目的

外倒转术(ECV)已被证明可降低臀位孕妇剖宫产的可能性。在本研究中,我们调查了利托君作为ECV宫缩抑制剂的有效性和安全性。

方法

本研究共纳入407例无ECV禁忌证的臀位孕妇。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估使用利托君对ECV安全性和有效性的影响。

结果

总体成功率为67.6%,在对混杂因素进行校正后,使用利托君与ECV成功几率显著升高相关。此外,使用利托君并未增加不良反应风险,包括胎儿心率的暂时变化、因ECV期间胎儿窘迫而行择期或急诊剖宫产的需求、阿氏评分低以及围产期死亡率。

结论

我们的结果表明,在ECV期间使用利托君作为宫缩抑制剂可能会增加ECV成功的可能性,且可能不会增加不良围产期结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f4/9483666/5a78699474b1/ogs-22106f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f4/9483666/5a78699474b1/ogs-22106f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f4/9483666/5a78699474b1/ogs-22106f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Ritodrine in external cephalic version: is it effective and safe?利托君用于外倒转术:其有效性和安全性如何?
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Sep;65(5):420-429. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22106. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
2
Tocolysis in term breech external cephalic version.足月臀位外倒转术中的宫缩抑制
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jan;88(1):5-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.09.014.
3
Maternal and perinatal outcomes in external cephalic version: prognostic factors for the success of the technique.经皮外倒转术的母婴围生期结局:该技术成功的预测因素。
J Perinat Med. 2019 Sep 25;47(7):717-723. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0143.
4
Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study.硝苯地平与利托君在经皮外转胎位术时的效果比较:一项病例对照研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Sep;34(18):3008-3013. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1677589. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
5
Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study.阿托西班与利托君用于足月时经阴道外倒转术的保胎治疗:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Perinat Med. 2010;38(1):23-8. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2010.010.
6
Atosiban versus ritodrine as tocolytics in external cephalic version.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Jan;35(1):80-85. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1712702. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version.阿托西班和利托君在外部胎位倒转术中的应用。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(8):927-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340701343123.
8
External cephalic version following prior cesarean delivery: A comparative cohort analysis.剖宫产术后外倒转术:一项比较队列分析。
9
External cephalic version at term using broad criteria: effect on mode of delivery.
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1995;22(4):279-84.
10
Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls.外倒转术失败后的产科及新生儿结局:失败组、成功组与对照组的分层分析
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Mar;28(5):605-10. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.927429. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Ritodrine versus salbutamol for external cephalic version.利托君与沙丁胺醇用于经阴道外转胎位术。
Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;74(4):337-342. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05035-7. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Height of elevated fetal buttock for prediction of successful external cephalic version.抬高胎儿臀部的高度用于预测外倒转术的成功率。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Jan;63(1):13-18. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.1.13. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
3
Atosiban versus ritodrine as tocolytics in external cephalic version.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Jan;35(1):80-85. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1712702. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
4
Reviving external cephalic version: a review of its efficacy, safety, and technical aspects.外倒转术的复苏:疗效、安全性及技术方面的综述
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019 Nov;62(6):371-381. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.371. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
5
Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study.硝苯地平与利托君在经皮外转胎位术时的效果比较:一项病例对照研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Sep;34(18):3008-3013. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1677589. Epub 2019 Oct 13.
6
An ecological study of geographic variation and factors associated with cesarean section rates in South Korea.韩国剖宫产率的地理变异及相关因素的生态学研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 May 9;19(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2300-0.
7
External cephalic version experiences in Korea.韩国的外倒转术经验。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016 Mar;59(2):85-90. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2016.59.2.85. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.剖宫产率的上升趋势:全球、区域和国家估计:1990 - 2014年
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. eCollection 2016.
9
Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section.选择性剖宫产的指征与风险
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jul 20;112(29-30):489-95. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0489.
10
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version.在使用外倒转术时,帮助足月儿臀位转为头先露的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 9;2015(2):CD000184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000184.pub4.