School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Jul 21;2022:9631782. doi: 10.1155/2022/9631782. eCollection 2022.
In order to further curb the damage to the ecological environment from the perspective of legal synergistic supervision, a synergistic analysis method between the ecological protection environmental law and the ecological Civil Code is proposed. Coordinated supervision, with the new Civil Code as the research background, from the perspective of interpretation, explores the solution to the problem of "ecological environmental damage" in the newly promulgated Civil Code for behavior that damages the ecological environment. The research results believe that, from the perspective of rights, environmental rights should be regarded as the concentrated expression of rights in the sense of private law in the ecological environment law. Article 1234 of the Tort Liability Section stipulates that "the state-specified agency or the law-specified organization" as the representative of environmental public interests proposes damage. The request resolves the legitimacy of relevant agencies and organizations as civil subjects to represent environmental public interests. Finally, it clearly stipulates the responsibility for ecological restoration, expands the way of undertaking tort liability caused by environmental damage, and solves the problem that it was limited to "restoration" in the past and could not be actually performed.
为了从法律协同监管的角度进一步遏制生态环境损害,提出了生态环境保护法与生态民法的协同分析方法。以新《民法典》为研究背景,协调监管,从解释的角度探讨了在新颁布的《民法典》中对损害生态环境的行为的“生态环境损害”问题的解决方案。研究结果认为,从权利的角度来看,环境权利应被视为生态环境法中私法意义上权利的集中体现。侵权责任编第 1234 条规定,“国家规定的机关或者法律规定的组织”作为环境公益的代表提出损害赔偿请求,解决了相关机构和组织作为民事主体代表环境公益的合法性问题。最后,明确规定了生态修复责任,扩大了环境损害侵权责任的承担方式,解决了过去仅限于“修复”而无法实际履行的问题。