Zürcher Tobias
Institute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine (IBME), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Gymnasium/FMS Thun, Thun, Switzerland.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 15;13:909970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.909970. eCollection 2022.
The desire to die brings about the most radical consequences that can occur in a human life. It therefore requires a high degree of justification. Questions have been raised as to whether this justification can be given in the case of a suicide desire in mental illness. Landmark court decisions and the practice of assisted suicide organizations make the justification of a mentally ill person's suicide desire dependent on the desire not being an expression of the illness. This view is explained in detail and finally rejected as misleading. That argument is based on a conceptual analysis of the self, the nature of reasons for action, and the meaning of necessity with respect to personal autonomy. Against this background, it is shown that it is irrelevant for the assessment of the desire to die whether it has been causally brought about by the mental illness. On the other hand, what matters is whether the person has an internal reason that gives importance to his or her desire. This is to be distinguished from external, normative expectations of a person's "normal" desires. An internal reason that justifies the person's concern must give expression to who the person essentially is and what the person fundamentally cares about. Three objections to this view are formulated, critically evaluated, and rejected. From these considerations it follows that a professional assessment of the desire to die of mentally ill persons must consist primarily in clarifying whether the desire to die fulfills the stated conditions for freedom, irrespective of the mental illness.
求死的愿望会带来人类生命中可能出现的最极端后果。因此,这需要高度的正当理由。对于精神疾病患者自杀愿望的情况是否能给出这种正当理由,人们提出了疑问。具有里程碑意义的法院判决和协助自杀组织的做法,使得精神疾病患者自杀愿望的正当理由取决于该愿望并非疾病的一种表现。这种观点得到了详细解释,但最终被认定为具有误导性而遭到拒绝。该论点基于对自我的概念分析、行动理由的本质以及个人自主性方面必要性的含义。在此背景下,研究表明,对于求死愿望的评估而言,它是否由精神疾病因果导致并不相关。另一方面,重要的是此人是否有一个重视其愿望的内在理由。这要与对一个人“正常”愿望的外部规范性期望区分开来。一个能为此人关切提供正当理由的内在理由,必须体现此人本质上是谁以及此人根本在乎什么。文中提出了针对这一观点的三个反对意见,并对其进行了批判性评估后予以驳回。从这些考量可以得出,对精神疾病患者求死愿望的专业评估必须主要在于弄清楚求死愿望是否满足所阐述的自由条件,而不论精神疾病如何。