Centre for Optometry and Vision Science, Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 1;12(1):13165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17448-w.
Drivers have different visual demands across varying contrast and luminance conditions. However, vision assessments for driving are typically conducted under photopic conditions. This study investigated the sensitivity of photopic and mesopic conditions to detect contrast sensitivity (CS) loss in drivers with simulated media opacities. CS was measured in forty-seven healthy drivers aged 18-50 years (mean ± SD: 25.5 ± 6.5) under photopic and mesopic-adapted luminance levels with the Pelli-Robson chart and the Mesotest II (without glare). Media opacities were simulated using white-opacity containing Lee Fog filters (1-5) and CS measured in a randomised order. A significant (p < 0.001) reduction in photopic CS (logCS) was measured with the Pelli-Robson chart only when media opacity was simulated with Fog filter 5 (1.53 ± 0.15, 2.8 triplets reduction) compared to baseline (1.95 ± 0.03). Mean mesopic CS demonstrated a significant (all p < 0.001) reduction from baseline (1.67 ± 0.14) for Fog filters 3 (1.4 triplets, 1.45 ± 0.16), 4 (2.4 triplets, 1.31 ± 0.14) and 5 (4.3 triplets, 1.02 ± 0.15). For Mesotest II, only Fog filter 5 produced a significant reduction (0.10 ± 0.09; p < 0.001) in mean mesopic CS from baseline (0.30 ± 0.01). Mesopic CS is more vulnerable to different levels of simulated media opacity, hence should be considered clinically when assessing visual function in older drivers at risk of media opacity.
驾驶员在不同对比度和亮度条件下有不同的视觉需求。然而,驾驶视觉评估通常是在明视觉条件下进行的。本研究旨在探究明视觉和中间视觉条件对模拟媒介混浊驾驶员对比敏感度(CS)损失的敏感性。47 名 18-50 岁健康驾驶员(平均±标准差:25.5±6.5 岁)接受明视觉和中间视觉适应亮度水平的 Pelli-Robson 图表和 Mesotest II(无眩光)检查。使用含白色不透明物的 Lee Fog 滤光片(1-5)模拟媒介混浊,并以随机顺序测量 CS。仅当使用 Fog 滤光片 5 模拟媒介混浊时,Pelli-Robson 图表才会测量到明视觉 CS(logCS)显著降低(p<0.001)(1.53±0.15,2.8 个三字母组减少)与基线相比(1.95±0.03)。与基线(1.67±0.14)相比,中视觉 CS 平均值(所有 p<0.001)显示出显著降低,Fog 滤光片 3(1.4 个三字母组,1.45±0.16)、4(2.4 个三字母组,1.31±0.14)和 5(4.3 个三字母组,1.02±0.15)。对于 Mesotest II,仅 Fog 滤光片 5 产生显著降低(0.10±0.09;p<0.001),从中视觉 CS 平均值降低至基线(0.30±0.01)。中视觉 CS 对不同程度的模拟媒介混浊更敏感,因此在评估有媒介混浊风险的老年驾驶员的视觉功能时,应在临床上考虑这一点。