Urquiza-Haas Nayeli, Cloatre Emilie
Law School University of Kent, Giles Lane, Eliot College Canterbury CT2 7NZ England.
J Law Soc. 2022 Jun;49(2):317-338. doi: 10.1111/jols.12367. Epub 2022 May 22.
This article looks at the development of the regulation of traditional herbal medicines in the European Union (EU) context and its effects in the United Kingdom (UK). Drawing on socio-legal encounters with science and technology studies (STS), it explores how UK and EU stakeholders have struggled to regulate herbal products, and suggests that in order to tackle growing concerns about their safety, emerging EU legislation built on socio-technical imaginaries of 'tradition'. We argue that in doing so, the law also reshaped herbal medicines in the UK, rewriting their histories and potential futures by fostering new practices of herbal medicine making that sit precariously on the boundaries of what is lawful. Through an empirical exploration of the everyday landscape of herbal medicine in the UK, this article shows how the label of 'tradition' embedded in the new legislation transformed and unsettled the existing material practices and relationships that had underpinned herbal and traditional medicine.
本文着眼于欧盟背景下传统草药监管的发展及其在英国的影响。借鉴社会法律与科学技术研究(STS)的相关内容,探讨了英国和欧盟的利益相关者在监管草药产品方面所面临的困难,并指出为应对对其安全性日益增长的担忧,欧盟基于 “传统” 的社会技术想象制定了新的立法。我们认为,这样做的同时,法律也重塑了英国的草药,通过培育处于合法边缘的新草药制作实践,重写了它们的历史和潜在未来。通过对英国草药日常情况的实证探索,本文展示了新立法中嵌入的 “传统” 标签如何改变并扰乱了支撑草药和传统医学的现有物质实践及关系。