Barnes Joanne
Centre for Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, School of Pharmacy, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Drug Saf. 2003;26(12):829-51. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326120-00001.
There is an increasing awareness at several levels of the need to develop pharmacovigilance practices for herbal medicines. The current model of pharmacovigilance and its associated tools have been developed in relation to synthetic drugs, and applying these methods to monitoring the safety of herbal medicines presents unique challenges in addition to those described for conventional medicines. Several problems relate to the ways in which herbal medicines are named, perceived, sourced, and utilised. Other important challenges arise from the current regulatory framework for herbal medicines in the UK. In the UK at present, the Committee on Safety of Medicines/Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's (CSM/MHRA) 'yellow card' scheme for adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting is the main method of monitoring the safety of herbal medicines. Despite recent initiatives to stimulate reporting of suspected ADRs associated with herbal medicines, such as extending the scheme to unlicensed herbal products, and including community pharmacists as recognised reporters, numbers of herbal ADR reports received by the CSM/MHRA remain relatively low. Under-reporting, an inevitable and important limitation of spontaneous reporting schemes, is likely to be significant for herbal medicines, since users typically do not seek professional advice about their use of such products, or report if they experience adverse effects. The herbal sector in the UK has initiated various spontaneous reporting schemes, based on the yellow card scheme, but targeted mainly at herbal-medicine practitioners. It is important that these schemes have a link with the CSM/MHRA so that potential signals are not missed. Several other tools used in pharmacovigilance of conventional medicines, such as prescription-event monitoring, and the use of computerised health-record databases, currently are of no use for evaluating the safety of herbal and other non-prescription medicines. Proposed European Union legislation for traditional herbal medicinal products will require manufacturers of products registered under new national schemes to comply with regulatory provisions on pharmacovigilance. In the longer term, other improvements in safety monitoring of herbal medicines may include modifications to existing methodology, patient reporting and greater consideration of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in optimising the safety of herbal medicines.
在多个层面上,人们越来越意识到有必要为草药制定药物警戒措施。当前的药物警戒模式及其相关工具是针对合成药物开发的,将这些方法应用于监测草药的安全性,除了常规药物所面临的挑战外,还存在独特的挑战。一些问题与草药的命名、认知、来源和使用方式有关。其他重要挑战则源于英国目前的草药监管框架。目前在英国,药品安全委员会/药品及医疗保健产品监管局(CSM/MHRA)的药品不良反应(ADR)报告“黄卡”计划是监测草药安全性的主要方法。尽管最近采取了一些举措来促进与草药相关的疑似ADR报告,比如将该计划扩展到未经许可的草药产品,并将社区药剂师纳入认可的报告者范围,但CSM/MHRA收到的草药ADR报告数量仍然相对较低。漏报是自发报告计划不可避免且重要的局限性,对于草药来说可能很严重,因为使用者通常不会就此类产品的使用寻求专业建议,或者在出现不良反应时也不会报告。英国的草药行业已基于“黄卡”计划启动了各种自发报告计划,但主要针对草药从业者。这些计划与CSM/MHRA建立联系很重要,这样才能不遗漏潜在信号。目前,常规药物药物警戒中使用的其他一些工具,如处方事件监测和计算机化健康记录数据库的使用,对于评估草药及其他非处方药的安全性毫无用处。欧盟拟议的传统草药产品立法将要求根据新的国家计划注册产品的制造商遵守药物警戒方面的监管规定。从长远来看,草药安全性监测的其他改进措施可能包括对现有方法进行修改、患者报告以及在优化草药安全性方面更多地考虑药物遗传学和药物基因组学。