• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国糖尿病风险评分用于确定个体 2 型糖尿病风险。

German Diabetes Risk Score for the Determination of the Individual Type 2 Diabetes Risk.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke (DIfE), Nuthetal; German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Munich; Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Berlin; Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg; Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital Tübingen; Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen; Institute of Nutritional Science, University of Potsdam, Nuthetal.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022 Sep 30;119(39):651-657. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0268.

DOI:10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0268
PMID:35915922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9811545/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The German Diabetes Risk Score (GDRS) currently enables prediction of the individual risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) within five years. The aim of this study is to extend the prediction period of the GDRS, including its non-clinical version and its HbA1c extension, to 10 years, and to perform external validation.

METHODS

In data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam study (n = 25 393), Cox proportional hazards regression was used to reweight the points that were used to calculate the five-year risk. Two population-based prospective cohorts (EPIC-Heidelberg n = 23 624, GNHIES98 cohort n = 3717) were used for external validation. Discrimination was represented by C-indices, and calibration by calibration plots and the expected-to-observed (E/O) ratio.

RESULTS

Prediction performance in EPIC-Potsdam was very good (C-index for the non-clinical model: 0.834) and was confirmed in EPIC-Heidelberg (0.843) and in the GNHIES98 cohort (0.851). Among persons in the GNHIES98 cohort with a greater than 10% predicted probability of disease, 14.9% developed T2D within 10 years (positive predictive value). The models were very well calibrated in EPIC-Potsdam (E/O ratio for the non-clinical model: 1.08), slightly overestimated the risk in EPIC-Heidelberg (1.34), and predicted T2D very well in the GNHIES98 cohort after recalibration (1.06).

CONCLUSION

The extended GDRS prediction period of 10 years, with a non-clinical version and an HbA1c extension that will soon be available in both German and English, enables the even longer-range, evidence-based identification of high-risk individuals with many different applications, including medical screening.

摘要

背景

德国糖尿病风险评分(GDRS)目前可用于预测个体在五年内患 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的风险。本研究旨在将 GDRS 的预测期延长至 10 年,包括其非临床版本和 HbA1c 扩展版本,并进行外部验证。

方法

在欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)-波茨坦研究的数据(n=25393)中,使用 Cox 比例风险回归对用于计算五年风险的分数进行重新加权。两个基于人群的前瞻性队列(EPIC-Heidelberg n=23624,GNHIES98 队列 n=3717)用于外部验证。使用 C 指数表示区分度,使用校准图和期望观察(E/O)比表示校准。

结果

在 EPIC-Potsdam 中的预测性能非常好(非临床模型的 C 指数:0.834),并在 EPIC-Heidelberg(0.843)和 GNHIES98 队列(0.851)中得到证实。在 GNHIES98 队列中,有大于 10%预测疾病概率的人群中,14.9%在 10 年内发生 T2D(阳性预测值)。模型在 EPIC-Potsdam 中非常准确(非临床模型的 E/O 比:1.08),在 EPIC-Heidelberg 中略有高估(1.34),在重新校准后在 GNHIES98 队列中很好地预测了 T2D(1.06)。

结论

扩展的 GDRS 预测期为 10 年,具有非临床版本和即将在德英两种语言中提供的 HbA1c 扩展,可更长期、基于证据地识别具有多种不同应用的高风险个体,包括医疗筛查。

相似文献

1
German Diabetes Risk Score for the Determination of the Individual Type 2 Diabetes Risk.德国糖尿病风险评分用于确定个体 2 型糖尿病风险。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022 Sep 30;119(39):651-657. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0268.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
Treatment of periodontal disease for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者控制血糖的牙周疾病治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 6;2015(11):CD004714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004714.pub3.
5
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
The development of type 2 diabetes management in people with severe mental illness in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2001 to 2015.丹麦首都大区 2001 至 2015 年期间严重精神疾病患者 2 型糖尿病管理的发展。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2024 Mar;149(3):219-233. doi: 10.1111/acps.13650. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
10
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of cardiovascular disease in Germany: results from GEDA 2022.德国心血管疾病风险:2022年德国健康访谈与体检调查(GEDA)结果
J Health Monit. 2025 May 21;10(2):e13126. doi: 10.25646/13126. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
B7-1 and PlGF-1 are two possible new biomarkers to identify fracture-associated trauma patients at higher risk of developing complications: a cohort study.B7-1 和 PlGF-1 是两种可能的新生物标志物,可用于识别骨折相关创伤患者中发生并发症风险较高的患者:一项队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 29;25(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07789-0.
3
Assessing mortality risk in Type 2 Diabetes patients with prolonged ASCVD risk factors: the inclusive Poh-Ai predictive scoring system with CAC Score integration.评估伴有长期动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)危险因素的2型糖尿病患者的死亡风险:纳入冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分的包容性博爱预测评分系统。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 May 19;16(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01341-9.

本文引用的文献

1
A newly developed and externally validated non-clinical score accurately predicts 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in the general adult population.一项新开发并经外部验证的非临床评分系统能准确预测普通成年人群的 10 年心血管疾病风险。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 4;11(1):19609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99103-4.
2
Selecting the optimal risk threshold of diabetes risk scores to identify high-risk individuals for diabetes prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.选择最佳的糖尿病风险评分风险阈值以识别糖尿病预防的高危个体:成本效益分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2020 Apr;57(4):447-454. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01451-1. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
3
Derivation and external validation of a clinical version of the German Diabetes Risk Score (GDRS) including measures of HbA1c.包含糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量指标的德国糖尿病风险评分(GDRS)临床版本的推导与外部验证
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018 Jul 6;6(1):e000524. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000524. eCollection 2018.
4
Multiple imputation was a valid approach to estimate absolute risk from a prediction model based on case-cohort data.多重填补是一种基于病例队列数据从预测模型估计绝对风险的有效方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;84:130-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
5
Validation of the German Diabetes Risk Score among the general adult population: findings from the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys.德国糖尿病风险评分在一般成年人群中的验证:来自德国健康访谈与检查调查的结果
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016 Nov 21;4(1):e000280. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000280. eCollection 2016.
6
Residential traffic and incidence of Type 2 diabetes: the German Health Interview and Examination Surveys.居住环境交通与2型糖尿病发病率:德国健康访谈与检查调查
Diabet Med. 2014 Oct;31(10):1269-76. doi: 10.1111/dme.12480. Epub 2014 May 30.
7
Update of the German Diabetes Risk Score and external validation in the German MONICA/KORA study.德国糖尿病风险评分的更新及在德国MONICA/KORA研究中的外部验证
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;104(3):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
Estimating the delay between onset and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes from the time course of retinopathy prevalence.从视网膜病变患病率的时间进程估算 2 型糖尿病发病与诊断之间的时间延迟。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1668-74. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2101. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
9
2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管风险评估指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2935-2959. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
[The first wave of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1): sample design, response, weighting and representativeness].[德国成人健康访谈与检查调查(DEGS1)的第一波:样本设计、应答、加权及代表性]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 May;56(5-6):620-30. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1650-9.