• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深度学习用于预测胶质瘤中的异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变:一种关键方法,使用贝叶斯方法对诊断测试性能进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

Deep learning for prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation in gliomas: a critical approach, systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test performance using a Bayesian approach.

作者信息

Karabacak Mert, Ozkara Burak Berksu, Mordag Seren, Bisdas Sotirios

机构信息

Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.

Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Aug;12(8):4033-4046. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-34.

DOI:10.21037/qims-22-34
PMID:35919062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338374/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventionally, identifying isocitrate dehydrogenase () mutation in gliomas is based on histopathological analysis of tissue specimens acquired via stereotactic biopsy or definitive resection. Accurate pre-treatment prediction of mutation status using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can guide clinical decision-making. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning (DL) to determine mutation status in gliomas.

METHODS

A systematic search of Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, and Scopus was conducted to identify relevant publications until August 1, 2021. Articles were included if all the following criteria were met: (I) patients with histopathologically confirmed World Health Organization (WHO) grade II, III, or IV gliomas; (II) histopathological examination with the mutation; (III) DL was used to predict the mutation status; (IV) sufficient data for reconstruction of confusion matrices in terms of the diagnostic performance of the DL algorithms; and (V) original research articles. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) was used to assess the studies' quality. Bayes theorem was utilized to calculate the posttest probability.

RESULTS

Four studies with a total of 1,295 patients were included. In the training set, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were 93.9%, 90.9% and 0.958, respectively. In the validation set, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the SROC curve were 90.8%, 85.5% and 0.939, respectively. With a known pretest probability of 80.2%, the Bayes theorem yielded a posttest probability of 97.6% and 96.0% for a positive test and 27.0% and 30.6% for a negative test for training sets and validation sets, respectively.

DISCUSSION

This is the first meta-analysis that summarizes the diagnostic performance of DL in predicting mutation status in gliomas via the Bayes theorem. DL algorithms demonstrate excellent diagnostic performance in predicting mutation in gliomas. Radiomic features associated with mutation, and its underlying pathophysiology extracted from advanced MRI may improve prediction probability. However, more studies are required to optimize and increase its reliability. Limitations include obtaining some data via email and lack of training and test sets statistics.

摘要

背景

传统上,识别胶质瘤中的异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变是基于通过立体定向活检或根治性切除获取的组织标本的组织病理学分析。使用磁共振成像(MRI)准确预测治疗前的IDH突变状态可指导临床决策。我们旨在评估深度学习(DL)在确定胶质瘤IDH突变状态方面的诊断性能。

方法

对Cochrane图书馆、科学网、Medline和Scopus进行系统检索,以识别截至2021年8月1日的相关出版物。如果满足以下所有标准,则纳入文章:(I)经组织病理学证实为世界卫生组织(WHO)二级、三级或四级胶质瘤的患者;(II)进行IDH突变的组织病理学检查;(III)使用DL预测IDH突变状态;(IV)就DL算法的诊断性能而言,有足够的数据重建混淆矩阵;以及(V)原始研究文章。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)和医学影像人工智能检查表(CLAIM)评估研究质量。利用贝叶斯定理计算检验后概率。

结果

纳入四项研究,共1295例患者。在训练集中,汇总敏感度、特异度和汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线下面积分别为93.9%、90.9%和0.958。在验证集中,汇总敏感度、特异度和SROC曲线下面积分别为90.8%、85.5%和0.939。已知检验前概率为80.2%时,贝叶斯定理得出训练集和验证集阳性检验的检验后概率分别为97.6%和96.0%,阴性检验的检验后概率分别为27.0%和30.6%。

讨论

这是第一项通过贝叶斯定理总结DL在预测胶质瘤IDH突变状态方面诊断性能的荟萃分析。DL算法在预测胶质瘤IDH突变方面表现出优异的诊断性能。与IDH突变相关的放射组学特征及其从高级MRI中提取的潜在病理生理学可能会提高预测概率。然而,需要更多研究来优化并提高其可靠性。局限性包括通过电子邮件获取一些数据以及缺乏训练集和测试集统计数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/85d37a0779fe/qims-12-08-4033-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/80a9775bbeac/qims-12-08-4033-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/3e2885138a35/qims-12-08-4033-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/2fc205e4a093/qims-12-08-4033-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/952e82c4d550/qims-12-08-4033-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/6ff3999c5b69/qims-12-08-4033-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/1c1bc6d932f2/qims-12-08-4033-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/71bb9e956701/qims-12-08-4033-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/85d37a0779fe/qims-12-08-4033-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/80a9775bbeac/qims-12-08-4033-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/3e2885138a35/qims-12-08-4033-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/2fc205e4a093/qims-12-08-4033-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/952e82c4d550/qims-12-08-4033-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/6ff3999c5b69/qims-12-08-4033-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/1c1bc6d932f2/qims-12-08-4033-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/71bb9e956701/qims-12-08-4033-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b6/9338374/85d37a0779fe/qims-12-08-4033-f8.jpg

相似文献

1
Deep learning for prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation in gliomas: a critical approach, systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic test performance using a Bayesian approach.深度学习用于预测胶质瘤中的异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变:一种关键方法,使用贝叶斯方法对诊断测试性能进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Aug;12(8):4033-4046. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-34.
2
Diagnostic accuracy and potential covariates for machine learning to identify IDH mutations in glioma patients: evidence from a meta-analysis.机器学习识别脑胶质瘤患者 IDH 突变的诊断准确性及潜在混杂因素:荟萃分析证据。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Aug;30(8):4664-4674. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06717-9. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
3
The T2-FLAIR-mismatch sign as an imaging biomarker for IDH and 1p/19q status in diffuse low-grade gliomas: a systematic review with a Bayesian approach to evaluation of diagnostic test performance.T2-FLAIR 错配征象作为弥漫性低级别胶质瘤 IDH 和 1p/19q 状态的影像学生物标志物:一项基于贝叶斯方法评估诊断试验性能的系统评价。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Dec 1;47(6):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.9.FOCUS19660.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of a machine learning-based radiomics approach of MR in predicting IDH mutations in glioma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于机器学习的磁共振成像放射组学方法预测胶质瘤患者异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 30;14:1409760. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1409760. eCollection 2024.
5
Noninvasive Determination of and 1p19q Status of Lower-grade Gliomas Using MRI Radiomics: A Systematic Review.使用 MRI 放射组学无创检测低级别胶质瘤的 和 1p19q 状态:系统评价。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):94-101. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6875. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
Comparison of MRI Sequences to Predict Mutation Status in Gliomas Using Radiomics-Based Machine Learning.使用基于影像组学的机器学习比较MRI序列以预测胶质瘤的突变状态
Biomedicines. 2024 Mar 25;12(4):725. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040725.
7
Accuracy of Radiomics in Predicting Mutation Status in Diffuse Gliomas: A Bivariate Meta-Analysis.基于双变量 Meta 分析的影像组学预测弥漫性胶质瘤突变状态的准确性研究。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 Jan;6(1):e220257. doi: 10.1148/ryai.220257.
8
Deep-learning and conventional radiomics to predict genotyping status based on magnetic resonance imaging data in adult diffuse glioma.基于成人弥漫性胶质瘤磁共振成像数据,利用深度学习和传统放射组学预测基因分型状态。
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 30;13:1143688. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1143688. eCollection 2023.
9
A nomogram strategy for identifying the subclassification of IDH mutation and ATRX expression loss in lower-grade gliomas.一种用于识别低级别胶质瘤中异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变和α-地中海贫血/智力发育障碍综合征X连锁基因(ATRX)表达缺失亚分类的列线图策略。
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):3187-3198. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08444-1. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
10
RNA editing-based classification of diffuse gliomas: predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and chromosome 1p/19q codeletion.基于 RNA 编辑的弥漫性神经胶质瘤分类:预测异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变和染色体 1p/19q 联合缺失。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Dec 24;20(Suppl 19):659. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3236-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of deep learning for predicting glioma isocitrate dehydrogenase and 1p/19q co-deletion in MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.深度学习在磁共振成像中预测胶质瘤异柠檬酸脱氢酶和1p/19q共缺失的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11898-2.
2
Predicting IDH Mutation in Glioma Patients Using Deep Learning Algorithms with Conformal Prediction.使用具有共形预测的深度学习算法预测胶质瘤患者的异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01580-w.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence based on imaging data for predicting distant metastasis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead.停止为高风险决策解释黑箱机器学习模型,转而使用可解释模型。
Nat Mach Intell. 2019 May;1(5):206-215. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x. Epub 2019 May 13.
2
Multicenter DSC-MRI-Based Radiomics Predict IDH Mutation in Gliomas.基于多中心扩散加权磁共振成像的影像组学预测胶质瘤中的异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 5;13(16):3965. doi: 10.3390/cancers13163965.
3
Accuracy of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Molecular Features of Gliomas on MRI: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
基于影像数据的人工智能预测结直肠癌远处转移的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2025 May 12;15:1558915. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1558915. eCollection 2025.
4
MRI-derived deep learning models for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status in glioma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.用于预测胶质瘤患者1p/19q共缺失状态的磁共振成像衍生深度学习模型:诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Neuroradiology. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03631-z.
5
Adherence to the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): an umbrella review with a comprehensive two-level analysis.遵循医学影像人工智能清单(CLAIM):一项进行全面两级分析的汇总综述。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.4274/dir.2025.243182.
6
Predicting IDH and ATRX mutations in gliomas from radiomic features with machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利用机器学习从影像组学特征预测胶质瘤中的异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)和α-地中海贫血/智力低下综合征X连锁基因(ATRX)突变:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Front Radiol. 2024 Oct 31;4:1493824. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1493824. eCollection 2024.
7
Using artificial intelligence based imaging to predict lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利用基于人工智能的成像技术预测非小细胞肺癌中的淋巴结转移:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):7496-7512. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-664. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
8
Incorporation of Edited MRS into Clinical Practice May Improve Care of Patients with -Mutant Glioma.将编辑后的磁共振波谱分析纳入临床实践可能会改善携带突变的胶质瘤患者的护理。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Jan 8;46(1):113-120. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8413.
9
Medical image foundation models in assisting diagnosis of brain tumors: a pilot study.医学影像基础模型在脑肿瘤辅助诊断中的应用:一项初步研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6667-6679. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10728-1. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
10
Enhancing hospital course and outcome prediction in patients with traumatic brain injury: A machine learning study.提高创伤性脑损伤患者的住院过程和预后预测:一项机器学习研究。
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Feb;37(1):74-83. doi: 10.1177/19714009231212364. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
用于基于MRI对胶质瘤分子特征进行分类的机器学习算法的准确性:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 26;13(11):2606. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112606.
4
Performance of machine learning algorithms for glioma segmentation of brain MRI: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.基于脑 MRI 的脑胶质瘤分割的机器学习算法性能:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9638-9653. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08035-0. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers.医学影像人工智能清单(CLAIM):作者和审稿人指南
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Mar 25;2(2):e200029. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020200029. eCollection 2020 Mar.
6
Machine Learning for the Prediction of Molecular Markers in Glioma on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于磁共振成像的机器学习预测脑胶质瘤分子标志物的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Jun 15;89(1):31-44. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab103.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Bayesian meta-analysis now - let's do it.现在进行贝叶斯元分析——我们开始吧。
Croat Med J. 2020 Dec 31;61(6):564-568. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2020.61.564.
9
Noninvasive Determination of and 1p19q Status of Lower-grade Gliomas Using MRI Radiomics: A Systematic Review.使用 MRI 放射组学无创检测低级别胶质瘤的 和 1p19q 状态:系统评价。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):94-101. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6875. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
10
A decade of radiomics research: are images really data or just patterns in the noise?放射组学研究的十年:图像真的是数据,还是只是噪声中的模式?
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jan;31(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07108-w. Epub 2020 Aug 7.