• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情紧急状态下医护人员应激暴露的脑电图评估:不仅仅是一种印象

EEG Evaluation of Stress Exposure on Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 Emergency: Not Just an Impression.

作者信息

LoMauro Antonella, Molisso Maria Takeko, Mameli Francesca, Ruggiero Fabiana, Ferrucci Roberta, Dellarosa Chiara, Aglieco Giada, Aliverti Andrea, Barbieri Sergio, Vergari Maurizio

机构信息

Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria. Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Unità di Neurofisiopatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Jul 18;16:923576. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.923576. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2022.923576
PMID:35923294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9339626/
Abstract

Psychological distress among healthcare professionals, although already a common condition, was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This effect has been generally self-reported or assessed through questionnaires. We aimed to identify potential abnormalities in the electrical activity of the brain of healthcare workers, operating in different roles during the pandemic. Cortical activity, cognitive performances, sleep, and burnout were evaluated two times in 20 COVID-19 frontline operators (FLCO, median age 29.5 years) and 20 operators who worked in COVID-19-free units (CFO, median 32 years): immediately after the outbreak of the pandemic (first session) and almost 6 months later (second session). FLCO showed higher theta relative power over the entire scalp (FLCO = 19.4%; CFO = 13.9%; = 0.04) and lower peak alpha frequency of electrodes F7 (FLCO = 10.4 Hz; CFO = 10.87 Hz; = 0.017) and F8 (FLCO = 10.47 Hz; CFO = 10.87 Hz; = 0.017) in the first session. FLCO parietal interhemispheric coherence of theta (FLCO I = 0.607; FLCO II = 0.478; = 0.025) and alpha (FLCO I = 0.578; FLCO II = 0.478; = 0.007) rhythms decreased over time. FLCO also showed lower scores in the global cognitive assessment test (FLCO = 22.72 points; CFO = 25.56; = 0.006) during the first session. The quantitative evaluation of the cortical activity might therefore reveal early signs of changes secondary to stress exposure in healthcare professionals, suggesting the implementation of measures to prevent serious social and professional consequences.

摘要

医护人员的心理困扰虽然已是一种常见状况,但在新冠疫情期间进一步加剧。这种影响通常是通过自我报告或问卷调查来评估的。我们旨在识别在疫情期间担任不同角色的医护人员大脑电活动的潜在异常情况。对20名新冠疫情一线工作人员(FLCO,中位年龄29.5岁)和20名在无新冠疫情科室工作的人员(CFO,中位年龄32岁)进行了两次皮质活动、认知表现、睡眠和倦怠情况的评估:在疫情爆发后立即进行(第一次评估),以及大约6个月后(第二次评估)。在第一次评估中,FLCO在整个头皮上显示出更高的θ相对功率(FLCO = 19.4%;CFO = 13.9%;P = 0.04),电极F7(FLCO = 10.4赫兹;CFO = 10.87赫兹;P = 0.017)和F8(FLCO = 10.47赫兹;CFO = 10.87赫兹;P = 0.017)的α峰值频率更低。随着时间推移,FLCO顶叶半球间θ(FLCO I = 0.607;FLCO II = 0.478;P = 0.025)和α(FLCO I = 0.578;FLCO II = 0.478;P = 0.007)节律的相干性降低。在第一次评估期间,FLCO在整体认知评估测试中的得分也更低(FLCO = 22.72分;CFO = 25.56分;P = 0.006)。因此,对皮质活动的定量评估可能揭示医护人员因压力暴露而产生变化的早期迹象,这表明应采取措施以防止严重的社会和职业后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d29/9339626/39fbc567fd46/fnsys-16-923576-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d29/9339626/5e99600cde6c/fnsys-16-923576-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d29/9339626/3975db70e9b7/fnsys-16-923576-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d29/9339626/60c7f824be70/fnsys-16-923576-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d29/9339626/39fbc567fd46/fnsys-16-923576-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d29/9339626/5e99600cde6c/fnsys-16-923576-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d29/9339626/3975db70e9b7/fnsys-16-923576-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d29/9339626/60c7f824be70/fnsys-16-923576-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d29/9339626/39fbc567fd46/fnsys-16-923576-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
EEG Evaluation of Stress Exposure on Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 Emergency: Not Just an Impression.新冠疫情紧急状态下医护人员应激暴露的脑电图评估:不仅仅是一种印象
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Jul 18;16:923576. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.923576. eCollection 2022.
2
Trends in burnout and psychological distress in hospital staff over 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective longitudinal survey.新冠疫情12个月期间医院工作人员的职业倦怠和心理困扰趋势:一项前瞻性纵向调查
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2022 May 25;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12995-022-00352-4.
3
Infodemia: Another Enemy for Romanian Frontline Healthcare Workers to Fight during the COVID-19 Outbreak.信息疫情:罗马尼亚一线医护人员在新冠疫情期间要对抗的另一个敌人。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 9;56(12):679. doi: 10.3390/medicina56120679.
4
High levels of psychosocial distress among Australian frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey.新冠疫情期间澳大利亚一线医护人员的高度心理社会困扰:一项横断面调查
Gen Psychiatr. 2021 Sep 6;34(5):e100577. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2021-100577. eCollection 2021.
5
An assessment of psychological distress and professional burnout in mental health professionals in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic.澳大利亚在 COVID-19 大流行期间对心理健康专业人员的心理困扰和职业倦怠的评估。
Australas Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;29(6):628-634. doi: 10.1177/10398562211038906. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
6
A tranquil virtual reality experience to reduce subjective stress among COVID-19 frontline healthcare workers.一项宁静的虚拟现实体验,以减轻 COVID-19 一线医护人员的主观压力。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0262703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262703. eCollection 2022.
7
Psychological and mental health impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in China: A review.新冠疫情对中国医护人员的心理和心理健康影响:综述
World J Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 19;11(7):337-346. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i7.337.
8
Burnout Status of Italian Healthcare Workers during the First COVID-19 Pandemic Peak Period.意大利医护人员在新冠疫情首个高峰期的职业倦怠状况
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;9(5):510. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050510.
9
Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in a cohort of Italian rehabilitation healthcare workers.COVID-19 对意大利康复医疗机构工作人员队列心理健康的影响。
J Med Virol. 2022 Jan;94(1):110-118. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27272. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
10
Job burnout among Israeli healthcare workers during the first months of COVID-19 pandemic: The role of emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress.新冠疫情大流行初期以色列医护人员的职业倦怠:情绪调节策略和心理困扰的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265659. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural Correlates of Burnout Syndrome Based on Electroencephalography (EEG)-A Mechanistic Review and Discussion of Burnout Syndrome Cognitive Bias Theory.基于脑电图(EEG)的职业倦怠综合征的神经关联——职业倦怠综合征认知偏差理论的机制性综述与探讨
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 29;14(15):5357. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155357.
2
Neuroimaging insights into the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.神经影像学对2019冠状病毒病大流行心理社会影响的见解:一项系统综述
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 10;15(1):236. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03423-2.
3
Cumulative lifetime stressor exposure impairs stimulus-response but not contextual learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Abnormal EEG signal energy in the elderly: A wavelet analysis of event-related potentials during a stroop task.老年人异常脑电图信号能量:斯特鲁普任务中事件相关电位的小波分析。
J Neurosci Methods. 2022 Jul 1;376:109608. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109608. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
Acute stress increases left hemispheric activity measured via changes in frontal alpha asymmetries.急性应激通过额叶α波不对称性的变化来测量,会增加左半球的活动。
iScience. 2022 Feb 1;25(2):103841. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103841. eCollection 2022 Feb 18.
3
COVID-19 and mental disorders in healthcare Personnel: A novel framework to develop Personas from an online survey.
累积的生活压力源暴露会损害刺激-反应学习,但不会损害情境学习。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 7;14(1):13080. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62595-x.
COVID-19 与医护人员精神障碍:一项从在线调查中开发角色原型的新框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Feb;126:103993. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.103993. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
4
Asymmetry of Regional Phase Synchrony Cortical Networks Under Cognitive Alertness and Vigilance Decrement States.认知警觉和警觉下降状态下皮质网络区域相位同步的非对称性。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:2378-2387. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3125420. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
5
A Review on Mental Stress Assessment Methods Using EEG Signals.基于脑电信号的精神压力评估方法综述
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 26;21(15):5043. doi: 10.3390/s21155043.
6
Quantitative EEG in Cognitive Neuroscience.认知神经科学中的定量脑电图
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 19;11(4):517. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11040517.
7
Factors mediating the psychological well-being of healthcare workers responding to global pandemics: A systematic review.应对全球大流行病的医护人员心理健康的中介因素:系统评价。
J Health Psychol. 2022 Jul;27(8):1875-1896. doi: 10.1177/13591053211012759. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
8
Facing COVID-19 Between Sensory and Psychoemotional Stress, and Instrumental Deprivation: A Qualitative Study of Unmanageable Critical Incidents With Doctors and Nurses in Two Hospitals in Northern Italy.面对新冠疫情:感官与心理情绪压力及工具性匮乏之间的困境——对意大利北部两家医院医护人员难以应对的重大事件的定性研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;12:622894. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622894. eCollection 2021.
9
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and well-being of UK healthcare workers.新冠疫情对英国医护人员心理健康和福祉的影响。
BJPsych Open. 2021 Apr 29;7(3):e88. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.42.
10
Prolonged COVID 19 Outbreak and Psychological Response of Nurses in Italian Healthcare System: Cross-Sectional Study.意大利医疗系统中新冠疫情长期爆发及护士的心理反应:横断面研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 6;12:608413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608413. eCollection 2021.