• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

几何骨固定路径中经皮横髂骶螺钉的不同长度:有限元分析

Different Lengths of Percutaneous Transverse Iliosacral Screw in Geometric Osseous Fixation Pathway: A Finite-Element Analysis.

作者信息

Wu Qiong, Zhang Yuanzhi, Wang Shaobai, Liu Rui, Liu Gang

机构信息

Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, People's Republic of China.

Department of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2022 Jun 1;56(8):1354-1362. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00656-x. eCollection 2022 Aug.

DOI:10.1007/s43465-022-00656-x
PMID:35923306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9283617/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biomechanical performances of the sacroiliac screw fixation of the first sacral vertebra with different lengths of screws using the Finite-Element Method.

METHODS

First, pelvic CT images were generated from a healthy volunteer, and multislice sagittal views were produced to determine the axis for the first sacral vertebra geometric osseous fixation pathway (GOFP). Subsequently, according to the geometric size and mechanical parameters of the iliosacral screw, the screw models with the same diameter of 7.3 mm and different lengths of 80 mm, 90 mm, 100 mm, 110 mm, 120 mm, 130 mm and 140 mm were built. Then the seven screws were assembled with the pelvic model. The maximum von Mises stress and the shape variables were evaluated for the pelvis and the screws.

RESULTS

Results are shown for the pelvic and GOFP screw, respectively. The simulation results show that the maximum von Mises stress in the cortex of the pelvic ring of the pelvis with the 130-mm length screw is the lowest among the pelvic models with different screws. Moreover, the peak displacement of the pelvis with the 130-mm length screw is the smallest. These results indicate that under the standing condition, a 130-mm length screw can decrease the stress concentration and result in a more effective transfer of stress within the reconstructed pelvis. In addition, the displacement of the screw with a 130-mm length is the smallest among all the considered screws. The peak von Mises stresses in the 130-mm length screw and the cortex are still within a low and elastic range below the yielding strengths of the materials.

CONCLUSION

Through the finite element analysis, the GOFP can be used as a safe and effective way for iliosacral screw fixation. The optimal length of the screw may be 130 mm length.

摘要

目的

采用有限元方法评估不同长度螺钉对第一骶椎骶髂螺钉固定的生物力学性能。

方法

首先,从一名健康志愿者获取骨盆CT图像,并生成多层矢状面视图以确定第一骶椎几何骨固定路径(GOFP)的轴线。随后,根据髂骶螺钉的几何尺寸和力学参数,构建直径均为7.3mm、长度分别为80mm、90mm、100mm、110mm、120mm、130mm和140mm的螺钉模型。然后将这七枚螺钉与骨盆模型进行组装。评估骨盆和螺钉的最大von Mises应力及形状变量。

结果

分别给出了骨盆和GOFP螺钉的结果。模拟结果表明,在不同螺钉的骨盆模型中,使用130mm长螺钉时骨盆环皮质的最大von Mises应力最低。此外,使用130mm长螺钉时骨盆的峰值位移最小。这些结果表明,在站立状态下,130mm长的螺钉可降低应力集中,并在重建骨盆内实现更有效的应力传递。此外,在所有考虑的螺钉中,130mm长螺钉的位移最小。130mm长螺钉及其皮质中的峰值von Mises应力仍处于低于材料屈服强度的低弹性范围内。

结论

通过有限元分析,GOFP可作为一种安全有效的髂骶螺钉固定方法。螺钉的最佳长度可能为130mm。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/9f97c67da63c/43465_2022_656_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/f87bf0b4a094/43465_2022_656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/2a01c4330065/43465_2022_656_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/31d84b659e03/43465_2022_656_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/fa2429c17436/43465_2022_656_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/9f97c67da63c/43465_2022_656_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/f87bf0b4a094/43465_2022_656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/2a01c4330065/43465_2022_656_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/31d84b659e03/43465_2022_656_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/fa2429c17436/43465_2022_656_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8832/9283617/9f97c67da63c/43465_2022_656_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Different Lengths of Percutaneous Transverse Iliosacral Screw in Geometric Osseous Fixation Pathway: A Finite-Element Analysis.几何骨固定路径中经皮横髂骶螺钉的不同长度:有限元分析
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Jun 1;56(8):1354-1362. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00656-x. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Comparison of the risk of breakage of two kinds of sacroiliac screws in the treatment of bilateral sacral fractures.两种骶髂螺钉治疗双侧骶骨骨折时的断裂风险比较
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jul;23(7):1558-67. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3313-z. Epub 2014 Apr 27.
3
[Design of Minimal Invasive Screw on Posterior Pelvis Ring and Pelvic Finite Element Analysis].[骨盆后环微创螺钉设计及骨盆有限元分析]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Sep;48(5):673-680.
4
[Implantation of iliosacral screws. Simulation of optimal placement by 3-dimensional X-ray computed tomography].[髂骶螺钉植入。通过三维X线计算机断层扫描模拟最佳置入位置]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000 Jun;86(4):360-9.
5
Biomechanical comparison of sacral and transarticular sacroiliac screw fixation.骶骨与经关节骶髂螺钉固定的生物力学比较。
Spine Deform. 2020 Oct;8(5):853-862. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00108-2. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
6
Finite Element Analysis of Channel Screw and Conventional Plate Technique in Tile B2 Pelvic Fracture.Tile B2型骨盆骨折中通道螺钉与传统钢板技术的有限元分析
J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 10;13(3):506. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030506.
7
A finite element analysis of the pelvic reconstruction using fibular transplantation fixed with four different rod-screw systems after type I resection.I型切除术后使用四种不同棒-螺钉系统固定腓骨移植进行骨盆重建的有限元分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Feb 20;121(4):321-6.
8
Mechanical comparison between lengthened and short sacroiliac screws in sacral fracture fixation: a finite element analysis.骶骨骨折固定中加长与短型骶髂螺钉的力学比较:有限元分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Sep;99(5):601-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
9
Biomechanical comparison of posterior pelvic ring fixation.骨盆后环固定的生物力学比较
J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Aug;17(7):481-7. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200308000-00002.
10
Vertically unstable pelvic fractures fixed with percutaneous iliosacral screws: does posterior injury pattern predict fixation failure?经皮骶髂螺钉固定垂直不稳定骨盆骨折:后方损伤模式能否预测固定失败?
J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Jul;17(6):399-405. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200307000-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Lumbopelvic Stabilization with Two Methods of Triangular Osteosynthesis: A Biomechanical Study.两种三角形骨合成方法用于腰骶部稳定的生物力学研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):4744. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164744.

本文引用的文献

1
Corridor-diameter-dependent angular tolerance for safe transiliosacral screw placement: an anatomic study of 433 pelves.经髂骨翼置钉的通道直径相关角度容差:433 个骨盆的解剖学研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Oct;31(7):1485-1492. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02913-5. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
Biomechanical comparison of sacral and transarticular sacroiliac screw fixation.骶骨与经关节骶髂螺钉固定的生物力学比较。
Spine Deform. 2020 Oct;8(5):853-862. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00108-2. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
3
Sacroiliac secure corridor: analysis for safe insertion of iliosacral screws.
骶髂安全通道:髂骶螺钉安全置入的分析
Rev Bras Ortop. 2013 Sep 27;48(4):348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2013.04.006. eCollection 2013 Jul-Aug.
4
Biomechanical Comparison of Three Internal Fixation Techniques for Stabilizing Posterior Pelvic Ring Disruption: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.三种内固定技术稳定骨盆后环破裂的生物力学比较:三维有限元分析。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Apr;11(2):195-203. doi: 10.1111/os.12431. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
5
Biomechanical study of different fixation techniques for the treatment of sacroiliac joint injuries using finite element analyses and biomechanical tests.采用有限元分析和生物力学试验对不同固定技术治疗骶髂关节损伤的生物力学研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Aug 1;87:250-257. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
6
Side-to-side variation in normal femoral morphology: 3D CT analysis of 122 femurs.正常股骨形态的左右差异:122例股骨的三维CT分析
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Feb;102(1):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
7
Biomechanical comparison of a transiliac internal fixator and two iliosacral screws in transforaminal sacral fractures: a finite element analysis.经椎间孔骶骨骨折中经髂内固定器与两枚髂骶螺钉的生物力学比较:有限元分析
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2015;17(1):39-49.
8
Iliosacral screw insertion using CT-3D-fluoroscopy matching navigation.使用CT-3D-透视匹配导航进行髂骶螺钉置入
Injury. 2014 Jun;45(6):988-94. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
9
Experimental validation of numerically predicted strain and micromotion in intact and implanted composite hemi-pelvises.完整及植入复合半骨盆中数值预测应变和微动的实验验证
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013 Feb;227(2):162-74. doi: 10.1177/0954411912461238.
10
CT-based 3-D visualisation of secure bone corridors and optimal trajectories for sacroiliac screws.基于 CT 的骶髂螺钉安全骨道和最佳进钉轨迹的三维可视化。
Injury. 2013 Jul;44(7):957-63. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.11.013. Epub 2012 Dec 14.