Allen Darcy W E, Berg Chris, Davidson Sinclair, Potts Jason
RMIT University, Carlton, Australia.
Eur J Law Econ. 2022;54(1):107-125. doi: 10.1007/s10657-022-09741-w. Epub 2022 May 19.
From an epidemiological perspective, the COVID-19 pandemic is a public health crisis. From an economic perspective, it is an externality and a social cost. Strikingly, almost all economic policy to address the infection externality has been formulated within a Pigovian analysis of implicit taxes and subsidies directed by a social planner drawing on social cost-benefit analysis. In this paper we examine the alternative economic methodology of the externality. We seek to understand how an exchange-focused and institutional analysis provides a better understanding of how to minimise social cost. Our Coasean framework allows us to further develop a comparative institutional analysis of the pandemic response.
从流行病学角度看,新冠疫情是一场公共卫生危机。从经济角度看,它是一种外部性和社会成本。引人注目的是,几乎所有应对感染外部性的经济政策都是在庇古分析的框架内制定的,即由社会规划者依据社会成本效益分析来指导隐性税收和补贴。在本文中,我们研究外部性的另一种经济方法。我们试图理解以交换为重点的制度分析如何能更好地理解如何将社会成本降至最低。我们的科斯框架使我们能够进一步开展对疫情应对措施的比较制度分析。