Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 4;17(8):e0271077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271077. eCollection 2022.
Various applications of head-tilting techniques in whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) have been introduced. However, a study on the setup uncertainties and margins in head-tilting techniques has not been reported. This study evaluated the setup uncertainties and determined the appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margins for patients treated in the head-tilted supine (ht-SP) and conventional supine position (c-SP) in WBRT. Thirty patients who received WBRT at our institution between October 2020 and May 2021 in the c-SP and ht-SP were investigated. The DUON head mask (60124, Orfit Industries, Wijnegem, Belgium) was used in the c-SP, and a thermoplastic U-Frame Mask (R420U, Klarity Medical & Equipment Co. Ltd., Lan Yu, China) was used in the ht-SP. Daily setup verification using planning computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT was corrected for translational (lateral, longitudinal, and vertical) and rotational (yaw) errors. In the c-SP, the means of systematic errors were -0.80, 0.79, and 0.37 mm and random errors were 0.27, 0.54, and 0.39 mm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical translational dimensions, respectively. Whereas, for the ht-SP, the means of systematic errors were -0.07, 0.73, and -0.63 mm, and random errors were 0.75, 1.39, 1.02 mm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical translational dimensions, respectively. The PTV margins were calculated using Stroom et al.'s [2Σ+0.7σ] and van Herk et al.'s recipe [2.5Σ+0.7σ]. Appropriate PTV margins with van Herk et al.'s recipe in WBRT were <2 mm and 1.5° in the c-SP and <3 mm and 2° in the ht-SP in the translational and rotational directions, respectively. Although the head tilt in the supine position requires more margin, it can be applied as a sufficiently stable and effective position in radiotherapy.
各种头倾技术在全脑放疗(WBRT)中的应用已经被介绍。然而,关于头倾技术的摆位误差和边界的研究尚未报道。本研究评估了头倾仰卧位(ht-SP)和常规仰卧位(c-SP)中 WBRT 患者的摆位误差,并确定了合适的计划靶区(PTV)边界。本研究纳入了 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 5 月期间在我院接受 c-SP 和 ht-SP 治疗的 30 例患者。在 c-SP 中使用了 DUON 头罩(60124,Orfit Industries,Wijnegem,比利时),在 ht-SP 中使用了热塑 U 型框面罩(R420U,Klarity Medical & Equipment Co. Ltd.,Lan Yu,中国)。使用计划 CT 和锥形束 CT 进行每日摆位验证,以校正平移(侧向、纵向和垂直)和旋转(偏航)误差。在 c-SP 中,系统误差的平均值分别为-0.80、0.79 和 0.37mm,随机误差分别为 0.27、0.54 和 0.39mm;而在 ht-SP 中,系统误差的平均值分别为-0.07、0.73 和-0.63mm,随机误差分别为 0.75、1.39 和 1.02mm。PTV 边界分别采用 Stroom 等的[2Σ+0.7σ]和 van Herk 等的[2.5Σ+0.7σ]公式计算。在 c-SP 和 ht-SP 中,使用 van Herk 等的公式时,WBRT 的 PTV 边界分别为<2mm 和 1.5°,<3mm 和 2°,分别用于平移和旋转方向。虽然仰卧位头倾需要更多的边界,但它可以作为一种足够稳定和有效的放射治疗体位。