• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

RIPI-f(面对面提供的心理干预措施的报告完整性)清单旨在指导面对面心理干预措施中治疗完整性的报告。

The RIPI-f (Reporting Integrity of Psychological Interventions delivered face-to-face) checklist was developed to guide reporting of treatment integrity in face-to-face psychological interventions.

机构信息

Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV), Madrid, Spain; Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Unidad de bioestadística clínica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.

Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;151:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.013
PMID:35926822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11192047/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Intervention integrity is the degree to which the study intervention is delivered as intended. This article presents the RIPI-f checklist (Reporting Integrity of Psychological Interventions delivered face-to-face) and summarizes its development methods. RIPI-f proposes guidance for reporting intervention integrity in evaluative studies of face-to-face psychological interventions.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We followed established procedures for developing reporting guidelines. We examined 56 documents (reporting guidelines, bias tools, and methodological guidance) for relevant aspects of face-to-face psychological intervention integrity. Eighty four items were identified and grouped as per the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) domains. Twenty nine experts from psychology and medicine and other scholars rated the relevance of each item in a single-round Delphi survey. A multidisciplinary panel of 11 experts discussed the survey results in three online consensus meetings and drafted the final version of the checklist.

RESULTS

We propose RIPI-f, a checklist with 50 items. Our checklist enhances TIDieR with important extensions, such as therapeutic alliance, provider's allegiance, and the adherence of providers and participants.

CONCLUSION

RIPI-f can improve the reporting of face-to-face psychological interventions. The tool can help authors, researchers, systematic reviewers, and guideline developers. We suggest using RIPI-f alongside other reporting guidelines.

摘要

目的

干预完整性是指研究干预措施按计划实施的程度。本文介绍了 RIPI-f 清单(面对面提供的心理干预措施的报告完整性),并总结了其制定方法。RIPI-f 为面对面心理干预评估研究中报告干预完整性提供了指导。

研究设计和设置

我们遵循了制定报告指南的既定程序。我们检查了 56 份文件(报告指南、偏差工具和方法学指南),以了解面对面心理干预完整性的相关方面。确定了 84 个项目,并根据干预描述和复制模板(TIDieR)领域进行了分组。来自心理学和医学以及其他领域的 29 名专家在一轮德尔菲调查中对每个项目的相关性进行了评分。一个由 11 名专家组成的多学科小组在三次在线共识会议上讨论了调查结果,并起草了清单的最终版本。

结果

我们提出了 RIPI-f,这是一个包含 50 个项目的清单。我们的清单通过扩展 TIDieR 来增强其重要性,例如治疗联盟、提供者的忠诚以及提供者和参与者的依从性。

结论

RIPI-f 可以提高面对面心理干预的报告质量。该工具可以帮助作者、研究人员、系统评价者和指南制定者。我们建议与其他报告指南一起使用 RIPI-f。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c7e/11192047/07ad1c213de6/nihms-2000500-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c7e/11192047/07ad1c213de6/nihms-2000500-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c7e/11192047/07ad1c213de6/nihms-2000500-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The RIPI-f (Reporting Integrity of Psychological Interventions delivered face-to-face) checklist was developed to guide reporting of treatment integrity in face-to-face psychological interventions.RIPI-f(面对面提供的心理干预措施的报告完整性)清单旨在指导面对面心理干预措施中治疗完整性的报告。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;151:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
2
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement.医疗干预措施系统评价概述报告规范:PRIOR 声明的制定。
BMJ. 2022 Aug 9;378:e070849. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070849.
3
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.更好的干预措施报告:干预描述和复制(TIDieR)清单和指南模板。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
4
[Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide].[干预措施的更好报告:干预描述与复制模板(TIDieR)清单及指南]
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Mar;78(3):175-88. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111066. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
5
Development of the CLARIFY (CheckList stAndardising the Reporting of Interventions For Yoga) guidelines: a Delphi study.CLARIFY(瑜伽干预措施报告标准化清单)指南的制定:一项德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e054585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054585.
6
Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension.社会和心理干预随机试验的报告:CONSORT-SPI 2018扩展版
Trials. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2733-1.
7
Developing a checklist for reporting research using simulated patient methodology (CRiSP): a consensus study.制定使用模拟患者方法进行研究报告的清单(CRiSP):一项共识研究。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2021 May 25;29(3):218-227. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riaa002.
8
TIDieR-Placebo: A guide and checklist for reporting placebo and sham controls.TIDieR-Placebo:报告安慰剂和假对照的指南和检查表。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 21;17(9):e1003294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003294. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Getting messier with TIDieR: embracing context and complexity in intervention reporting.干预措施报告中 TIDieR 越来越混乱:拥抱背景和复杂性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0461-y.
10
Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR reporting checklist: a systematic methodology review.使用 TIDieR 报告清单描述试验招募干预措施的内容:系统方法学综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02195-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological Challenges in Randomized Controlled Trials of mHealth Interventions: Cross-Sectional Survey Study and Consensus-Based Recommendations.移动健康干预随机对照试验中的方法学挑战:横断面调查研究与基于共识的建议
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 19;26:e53187. doi: 10.2196/53187.
2
Methodological challenges in systematic reviews of mHealth interventions: Survey and consensus-based recommendations.移动健康干预措施系统评价中的方法学挑战:基于调查与共识的建议
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Apr;184:105345. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105345. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
3
Psychosocial interventions to improve sexual functioning in women with cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders.精神障碍患者随机试验中的对照干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):MR000050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000050.pub2.
2
Intensity of Treatment as Usual and Its Impact on the Effects of Face-to-Face and Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: A Preregistered Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.常规治疗强度及其对抑郁症面对面治疗和基于互联网治疗效果的影响:一项随机对照试验的预注册荟萃分析
Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(3):200-209. doi: 10.1159/000521951. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
3
Effectiveness of Smartphone-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among Patients With Major Depression: Systematic Review of Health Implications.
心理社会干预对改善癌症女性性功能的作用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Sex Med Rev. 2024 Mar 26;12(2):142-153. doi: 10.1093/sxmrev/qead052.
4
Efficacy of Web-Based, Guided Self-help Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Enhanced for Binge Eating Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的、有指导的自助认知行为疗法增强治疗暴食障碍的疗效:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 1;25:e40472. doi: 10.2196/40472.
基于智能手机的认知行为疗法对重度抑郁症患者的疗效:健康影响的系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 10;9(2):e24703. doi: 10.2196/24703.
4
TIDieR-Placebo: A guide and checklist for reporting placebo and sham controls.TIDieR-Placebo:报告安慰剂和假对照的指南和检查表。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 21;17(9):e1003294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003294. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Examining How Treatment Fidelity Is Supported, Measured, and Reported in K-3 Reading Intervention Research.审视小学低年级阅读干预研究中治疗保真度是如何得到支持、测量和报告的。
Educ Psychol Rev. 2018 Sep;30(3):885-919. doi: 10.1007/s10648-017-9429-z. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
6
A review and meta-analysis of perfectionism interventions: Comparing face-to-face with online modalities.完美主义干预措施的回顾与荟萃分析:面对面与在线模式比较。
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Jul;66(4):473-486. doi: 10.1037/cou0000355. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
7
Treatment Fidelity in Mind-Body Interventions.身心干预中的治疗保真度。
J Holist Nurs. 2019 Jun;37(2):189-199. doi: 10.1177/0898010118800573. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
8
Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension.社会和心理干预随机试验的报告:CONSORT-SPI 2018扩展版
Trials. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2733-1.
9
Biases in research: risk factors for non-replicability in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy research.研究中的偏差:心理治疗与药物治疗研究中不可重复性的风险因素。
Psychol Med. 2017 Apr;47(6):1000-1011. doi: 10.1017/S003329171600324X. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
10
Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist.使用手机进行健康干预的报告指南:移动健康(mHealth)证据报告与评估(mERA)清单。
BMJ. 2016 Mar 17;352:i1174. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1174.