• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于智能手机的认知行为疗法对重度抑郁症患者的疗效:健康影响的系统评价。

Effectiveness of Smartphone-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among Patients With Major Depression: Systematic Review of Health Implications.

机构信息

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Berlin, Germany.

Centre for ePublic Health Research, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 10;9(2):e24703. doi: 10.2196/24703.

DOI:10.2196/24703
PMID:33565989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7904402/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression is often associated with rapid changes in mood and quality of life that persist for a period of 2 weeks. Despite medical innovations, there are problems in the provision of care. Long waiting times for treatment and high recurrence rates of depression cause enormous costs for health care systems. At the same time, comprehensive limitations in physical, psychological, and social dimensions are observed for patients with depression, which significantly reduce their quality of life. In addition to patient-specific limitations, undersupply and inappropriate health care have been determined. For this reason, new forms of care are discussed. Smartphone-based therapy is considered to have great potential due to its reach and easy accessibility. Low socioeconomic groups, which are always difficult to reach for public health interventions, can now be accessed due to the high dispersion of smartphones. There is still little information about the impact and mechanisms of smartphone-based therapy on depression. In a systematic literature review, the health implications of smartphone-based therapy were presented in comparison with standard care.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to identify and summarize the existing evidence regarding smartphone-based cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with depression and to present the health implications of smartphone-based cognitive behavioral therapy of considered endpoints.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify relevant studies by means of inclusion and exclusion criteria. For this purpose, the PubMed and Psyndex databases were systematically searched using a search syntax. The endpoints of depressive symptoms, depression-related anxiety, self-efficacy or self-esteem, and quality of life were analyzed. Identified studies were evaluated for study quality and risk of bias. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 studies were identified.

RESULTS

The studies examined in this review reported contradictory results regarding the investigated endpoints. In addition, due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, it was difficult to derive evident results. All included studies reported effects on depressive symptoms. The other investigated endpoints were only reported by isolated studies. Only 50% (4/8) of the studies reported effects on depression-related anxiety, self-efficacy or self-esteem, and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

No clear implications of smartphone-based cognitive behavioral therapy could be established. Evidence for the treatment of depression using smartphone-based cognitive behavioral therapy is limited. Additional research projects are needed to demonstrate the effects of smartphone-based cognitive behavioral therapy in the context of evidence-based medicine and to enable its translation into standard care. Participatory technology development might help to address current problems in mobile health intervention studies.

摘要

背景

抑郁症常伴有情绪和生活质量的快速变化,持续时间为 2 周。尽管医学创新,但在护理方面仍存在问题。治疗的长时间等待和抑郁症的高复发率给医疗保健系统带来了巨大的成本。与此同时,观察到抑郁症患者在身体、心理和社会维度上存在全面的局限性,这大大降低了他们的生活质量。除了患者特有的局限性外,还确定了供应不足和护理不当的问题。出于这个原因,正在讨论新的护理形式。由于智能手机的普及和易于获取,基于智能手机的治疗被认为具有巨大的潜力。由于智能手机的广泛分布,现在可以接触到总是难以接受公共卫生干预的低社会经济群体。关于基于智能手机的治疗对抑郁症的影响和机制,信息仍然很少。在系统的文献综述中,将基于智能手机的治疗与标准护理进行了比较,介绍了其对健康的影响。

目的

本综述的目的是确定和总结现有关于基于智能手机的认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症患者的证据,并介绍考虑的终点的基于智能手机的认知行为疗法的健康影响。

方法

通过纳入和排除标准,采用搜索语法,通过PubMed 和 Psyndex 数据库系统地搜索相关研究。分析了抑郁症状、与抑郁相关的焦虑、自我效能或自尊以及生活质量等终点。评估了确定的研究的研究质量和偏倚风险。在应用纳入和排除标准后,确定了 8 项研究。

结果

本综述中检查的研究报告了关于研究终点的相互矛盾的结果。此外,由于临床和方法学的异质性,很难得出明显的结果。所有纳入的研究都报告了对抑郁症状的影响。其他研究终点仅由孤立的研究报告。只有 50%(4/8)的研究报告了对与抑郁相关的焦虑、自我效能或自尊和生活质量的影响。

结论

无法确定基于智能手机的认知行为疗法的明确影响。使用基于智能手机的认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症的证据有限。需要开展更多的研究项目,以在循证医学的背景下证明基于智能手机的认知行为疗法的疗效,并将其转化为标准护理。参与式技术开发可能有助于解决移动健康干预研究中的当前问题。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Smartphone-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among Patients With Major Depression: Systematic Review of Health Implications.基于智能手机的认知行为疗法对重度抑郁症患者的疗效:健康影响的系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 10;9(2):e24703. doi: 10.2196/24703.
2
E-Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions.针对患有长期身体疾病的儿童和青少年焦虑与抑郁的电子健康干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012489. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012489.pub2.
3
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
4
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Parent-training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health.改善孕产妇心理社会健康的家长培训项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002020.pub2.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
10
Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer.音乐干预对改善癌症患者心理和生理结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):CD006911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Vortioxetine Oral Drops Versus Oral Tablets in Major Depressive Disorder: An Analysis of a Real-World Cohort Study in Switzerland.伏硫西汀口服滴剂与口服片剂治疗重度抑郁症的有效性和耐受性:瑞士一项真实世界队列研究的分析
CNS Drugs. 2025 Jul 27. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01207-2.
2
Cognitive behavioral therapy for the management of cardiometabolic disease risk factors; a systematic meta-review of meta-analyses.用于管理心血管代谢疾病风险因素的认知行为疗法;对荟萃分析的系统元综述
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07015-8.
3
Association between internet use and depression among the middle-aged and elderly adults with multimorbidity in China: do gender differences exist?

本文引用的文献

1
Depressive symptoms in a European comparison - Results from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2.欧洲比较中的抑郁症状——欧洲健康访谈调查(EHIS)2的结果
J Health Monit. 2019 Dec 11;4(4):57-65. doi: 10.25646/6227. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
Challenges in the Transition from In-Patient to Out-Patient Treatment in Depression.从住院治疗到门诊治疗在抑郁症中的转变面临的挑战。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Jul 6;117(27-28):472-479. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0472.
3
Understanding the Complex of Suicide in Depression: from Research to Clinics.
中国患有多种疾病的中老年人互联网使用与抑郁之间的关联:存在性别差异吗?
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 20;15:1494979. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1494979. eCollection 2024.
4
Efficacy of problem-solving therapy in treating late-life depression with potential cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.问题解决疗法治疗伴有潜在认知障碍的老年期抑郁症的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 29;14(10):e084130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084130.
5
Psychometric properties of the chinese version of the value-based stigma inventory (VASI): a translation and validation study.基于价值的污名量表(VASI)中文版的心理计量学特性:翻译和验证研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05998-4.
6
An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services.更易获取的数字心理健康服务概述与建议。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022 Feb;1(2):87-100. doi: 10.1038/s44159-021-00003-1. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
7
Evaluation of the internet-based intervention "Selfapy" in participants with unipolar depression and the impact on quality of life: a randomized, parallel group study.基于互联网的干预措施“Selfapy”对单相抑郁症患者的评估及其对生活质量的影响:一项随机平行组研究。
Qual Life Res. 2024 May;33(5):1275-1286. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03606-2. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
8
A qualitative interview study of patients' attitudes towards and intention to use digital interventions for depressive disorders on prescription.一项关于患者对处方中用于治疗抑郁症的数字干预措施的态度及使用意愿的定性访谈研究。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 5;6:1275569. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1275569. eCollection 2024.
9
Feasibility and utility of mobile health interventions for depression and anxiety in rural populations: A scoping review.移动健康干预对农村人口抑郁和焦虑的可行性及效用:一项范围综述
Internet Interv. 2024 Feb 3;35:100724. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100724. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
An umbrella review of effectiveness and efficacy trials for app-based health interventions.基于应用程序的健康干预措施有效性和功效试验的综合评价
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Dec 16;6(1):233. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00981-x.
理解抑郁症中的自杀情结:从研究到临床
Psychiatry Investig. 2020 Mar;17(3):207-221. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0171. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in the Digital Age: Presidential Address.认知行为疗法在数字时代:主席演讲。
Behav Ther. 2020 Jan;51(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
5
[Implementation and participatory design of digital health interventions].数字健康干预措施的实施与参与式设计
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Feb;63(2):145-152. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03079-6.
6
A Systematic Review of the Evidence Supporting Mobile- and Internet-Based Psychological Interventions For Self-Harm.基于移动设备和互联网的心理干预措施预防自伤行为的系统评价
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Feb;50(1):151-179. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12583. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
7
Changes in the global burden of depression from 1990 to 2017: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease study.1990年至2017年全球抑郁症负担的变化:全球疾病负担研究的结果
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Jul;126:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
8
Using science to sell apps: Evaluation of mental health app store quality claims.利用科学推销应用程序:对心理健康应用程序商店质量宣称的评估
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Mar 22;2:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0093-1. eCollection 2019.
9
Pilot Randomized Trial of a Self-Help Behavioral Activation Mobile App for Utilization in Primary Care.自助行为激活手机应用程序在初级保健中应用的试点随机试验。
Behav Ther. 2019 Jul;50(4):817-827. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
10
Rural Residents' Depressive Symptoms and Help-Seeking Preferences: Opportunities for Church-Based Intervention Development.农村居民的抑郁症状及求助偏好:基于教会的干预措施发展机遇
J Relig Health. 2019 Oct;58(5):1661-1671. doi: 10.1007/s10943-019-00807-9.