Suppr超能文献

联合健康保健教育中的质量保证:一项叙述性综述。

Quality assurance in allied healthcare education: A narrative review.

作者信息

Sreedharan Jithin K, Subbarayalu Arun Vijay, AlRabeeah Saad M, Karthika Manjush, Shevade Madhuragauri, Al Nasser Musallam Abdullah, Alqahtani Abdullah S

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Quality Assurance Department, Deanship of Quality and Academic Accreditation, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Can J Respir Ther. 2022 Jul 26;58:103-110. doi: 10.29390/cjrt-2022-009. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is no standard methodology for outlining the intricacies of allied healthcare education (AHE) or its quality. The profound misconception is that quality assurance (QA) in AHE is used on a "voluntary" basis. Given the absence of statutory regulatory mechanisms such as accreditation, validation, and audit by the peripheral agencies concerning QA, adoption of QA measures in AHE is not consistent, and it results in producing a subpar allied health workforce. This paper analyzes the need to include QA measures as an essential domain in evaluating the effectiveness of allied health professional education programs.

METHOD

A large database search was performed using pertinent terms, and a blueprint was developed for a meticulous literature review published between 2015 and 2021. Five hundred eighty-two articles were found and screened; a critical appraisal was performed for 22 peer-reviewed articles for relevant information.

RESULTS

The literature review identified the need to use academic domains such as leadership, planning, delivery, and feedback as QA criteria to evaluate the efficiency of education and training in allied health professional education programs. Instructors and facilitators for specific knowledge and skill development and a description of their roles should also be used in QA evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Resources for effective learning and teaching in the allied healthcare domain are limited. This review highlights the significant need to include a QA system in AHE, considering the pivotal role of these students in supporting humankind, now and in the future. The findings contribute to the research by providing essential insights into current trends and focusing on existing research in AHE quality.

摘要

引言

目前尚无标准方法来勾勒联合健康保健教育(AHE)的复杂性或其质量。一个严重的误解是,AHE中的质量保证(QA)是在“自愿”基础上使用的。由于缺乏诸如外部机构对QA的认证、验证和审核等法定监管机制,AHE中QA措施的采用并不一致,这导致培养出的联合健康保健劳动力质量不高。本文分析了将QA措施作为评估联合健康专业教育项目有效性的一个重要领域的必要性。

方法

使用相关术语进行了大型数据库搜索,并制定了一个蓝图,用于对2015年至2021年期间发表的文献进行细致的综述。共找到并筛选了582篇文章;对22篇同行评审文章进行了批判性评估以获取相关信息。

结果

文献综述确定需要将领导力、规划、授课和反馈等学术领域用作QA标准,以评估联合健康专业教育项目中的教育培训效率。QA评估还应使用负责特定知识和技能培养的教师及辅导员,并对其角色进行描述。

结论

联合健康保健领域有效学习和教学的资源有限。考虑到这些学生在当下及未来对人类支持的关键作用,本综述强调了在AHE中纳入QA系统的迫切需求。这些发现通过提供对当前趋势的重要见解并聚焦于AHE质量的现有研究,为该研究做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8295/9318339/a2742576c9f8/cjrt-2022-009-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验