Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, and the Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Dec;24(12):2297-2308. doi: 10.1111/dom.14830. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
It is well known that the multiple factors contributing to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) confer an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although the relationship between hyperglycaemia and increased microvascular risk is well established, the relative contribution of hyperglycaemia to macrovascular events has been strongly debated, particularly owing to the failure of attempts to reduce CVD risk through normalizing glycaemia with traditional therapies in high-risk populations. The debate has been further fuelled by the relatively recent discovery of the cardioprotective properties of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Further, as guidelines now recommend individualizing glycaemic targets, highlighting the importance of achieving glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) goals safely, the previously observed negative influences of intensive therapy on CVD risk might not present if trials were repeated using current-day treatments and individualized HbA1c goals. Emerging longitudinal data illuminate the overall effect of excess glucose, the impacts of magnitude and duration of hyperglycaemia on disease progression and risk of CVD complications, and the importance of glycaemic control at or early after diagnosis of T2D for prevention of complications. Herein, we review the role of glucose as a modifiable cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, the role of microvascular disease in predicting macrovascular risk, and the deleterious impact of therapeutic inertia on CVD risk. We reconcile new and old data to offer a current perspective, highlighting the importance of effective, early treatment in reducing latent CV risk, and the timely use of appropriate therapy individualized to each patient's needs.
众所周知,导致 2 型糖尿病(T2D)发病的多种因素会增加心血管疾病(CVD)的发病风险。虽然高血糖与微血管风险增加之间的关系已得到充分证实,但高血糖对大血管事件的相对贡献一直存在争议,特别是由于在高危人群中通过传统疗法使血糖正常化来降低 CVD 风险的尝试失败。由于最近发现胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂具有心脏保护作用,这一争论进一步加剧。此外,由于指南现在建议个体化血糖目标,强调安全实现糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)目标的重要性,如果使用当前的治疗方法和个体化 HbA1c 目标重复试验,以前观察到的强化治疗对 CVD 风险的负面影响可能不会出现。新出现的纵向数据阐明了过量葡萄糖的总体影响、高血糖的幅度和持续时间对疾病进展和 CVD 并发症风险的影响,以及在 T2D 诊断后或早期进行血糖控制对预防并发症的重要性。在此,我们回顾了葡萄糖作为可改变的心血管(CV)风险因素的作用、微血管疾病在预测大血管风险中的作用,以及治疗惰性对 CVD 风险的有害影响。我们整合了新旧数据,提供了当前的观点,强调了早期有效治疗降低潜在 CV 风险的重要性,以及及时使用针对每个患者需求的适当治疗的重要性。