Khan Adeel Ahmad, Ata Fateen, Aziz Afia, Qassim Aya Janan, Shukri Ahmed, Aboujabal Khaled Abdallah, Almohtasib Yazan, Jayyousi Amin, Bashir Mohammed, Surchi Haval
Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, Ohio, USA.
Department of Endocrinology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 Jul;8(4):e70069. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70069.
Many patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) are newly diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with very high hbA1c levels (> 10%). Early achievement of glycaemic control is of prime importance in such cases, and many guidelines recommend starting insulin together with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD) as part of discharge medications. However, large numbers of treatment-naïve patients are hesitant to use insulin due to various factors.
In this retrospective, single-centre, observational study, we compared the hbA1c at 1-year follow-up between newly diagnosed DM patients with initial hbA1c > 10% who were discharged on insulin plus OAD versus those only on OAD after admission with ACS. Pairwise comparisons between continuous and categorical study variables were performed using t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and chi-square. We used STATA 18 for analysis. Baseline characteristics have been described for all the patients included in the study. In the analysis of outcomes at follow-up, only patients who had follow-up at 1-year were included.
Of 149 patients eligible for inclusion, the majority were males (97.3%). The mean age was 47 ± 8.3 years. The baseline hbA1c at diagnosis was 11.2 (10.5-12.3) %. 38 (25.5%) Were Discharged on insulin + OADs, whereas 111 (75.5%) Were Discharged Only on OADs. There was no statistically significant difference in change in hbA1c from baseline between the two groups (Mean (SD) 4.4% ± 1.8% vs. 4% ± 1.5%, p = 0.07). None of the patients had any hyperglycaemic emergency, and there were no differences in recurrent admissions due to cardiac indications (p = 0.5).
An anti-DM regimen consisting of multiple oral agents is a safe and effective alternative to insulin plus OAD and can lead to a comparable reduction in hbA1c at 1-year in patients who are not willing to use insulin early after diagnosis of T2DM.
许多急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者新诊断为2型糖尿病(T2DM),糖化血红蛋白(hbA1c)水平非常高(>10%)。在此类病例中,早期实现血糖控制至关重要,许多指南建议将胰岛素与口服降糖药(OAD)联合作为出院用药的一部分。然而,大量未接受过治疗的患者由于各种因素对使用胰岛素犹豫不决。
在这项回顾性、单中心观察性研究中,我们比较了初始糖化血红蛋白>10%的新诊断糖尿病患者出院时接受胰岛素加口服降糖药与急性冠状动脉综合征入院后仅接受口服降糖药治疗的患者在1年随访时的糖化血红蛋白水平。连续和分类研究变量之间的成对比较采用t检验、曼-惠特尼检验和卡方检验。我们使用STATA 18进行分析。已描述了纳入研究的所有患者的基线特征。在随访结果分析中,仅纳入了有1年随访的患者。
在149例符合纳入标准的患者中,大多数为男性(97.3%)。平均年龄为47±8.3岁。诊断时的基线糖化血红蛋白为11.2(10.5 - 12.3)%。38例(25.5%)出院时接受胰岛素+口服降糖药治疗,而111例(75.5%)仅接受口服降糖药治疗。两组糖化血红蛋白从基线的变化无统计学显著差异(均值(标准差)4.4%±1.8%对4%±1.5%,p = 0.07)。所有患者均未发生任何高血糖急症,因心脏指征再次入院的情况也无差异(p =
对于2型糖尿病诊断后早期不愿使用胰岛素的患者,由多种口服药物组成的抗糖尿病治疗方案是胰岛素加口服降糖药的一种安全有效的替代方案,并且在1年时可使糖化血红蛋白水平得到类似程度的降低。