• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在大量学生群体中培养打字专长。

Typing expertise in a large student population.

机构信息

BCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Paseo Mikeletegi 69, 2º, 20009, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.

Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Aug 5;7(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00424-3.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-022-00424-3
PMID:35930064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9356123/
Abstract

Typing has become a pervasive mode of language production worldwide, with keyboards fully integrated in a large part of many daily activities. The bulk of the literature on typing expertise concerns highly trained professional touch-typists, but contemporary typing skills mostly result from unconstrained sustained practice. We measured the typing performance of a large cohort of 1301 university students through an online platform and followed a preregistered plan to analyse performance distributions, practice factors, and cognitive variables. The results suggest that the standard model with a sharp distinction between novice and expert typists may be inaccurate to account for the performance of the current generation of young typists. More generally, this study shows how the mere frequent use of a new tool can lead to the incidental development of high expertise.

摘要

打字已经成为全球范围内普遍的语言生成方式,键盘在许多日常活动中得到了充分的整合。大量关于打字技能的文献都涉及到经过高度训练的专业打字员,但现代打字技能主要源于不受限制的持续练习。我们通过在线平台测量了 1301 名大学生的打字表现,并按照预先注册的计划分析了表现分布、练习因素和认知变量。结果表明,标准模型中新手和专家打字员之间的明显区别可能不准确,无法解释当前年轻一代打字员的表现。更一般地说,这项研究展示了仅仅频繁使用新工具如何导致意外地发展出高度的专业技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/68ce0b4c9667/41235_2022_424_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/daa4882c6cae/41235_2022_424_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/0a341ff8b1f5/41235_2022_424_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/c9180e46af32/41235_2022_424_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/131aa5c58ca0/41235_2022_424_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/99a70a4dc38b/41235_2022_424_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/e02a9bf4a34c/41235_2022_424_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/68ce0b4c9667/41235_2022_424_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/daa4882c6cae/41235_2022_424_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/0a341ff8b1f5/41235_2022_424_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/c9180e46af32/41235_2022_424_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/131aa5c58ca0/41235_2022_424_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/99a70a4dc38b/41235_2022_424_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/e02a9bf4a34c/41235_2022_424_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ab/9356123/68ce0b4c9667/41235_2022_424_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Typing expertise in a large student population.在大量学生群体中培养打字专长。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Aug 5;7(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00424-3.
2
Motor imagery in typing: effects of typing style and action familiarity.打字中的运动意象:打字风格和动作熟悉度的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Feb;19(1):101-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0178-6.
3
What skilled typists don't know about the QWERTY keyboard.熟练的打字员所不知道的关于QWERTY键盘的事。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jan;76(1):162-71. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0548-4.
4
Relationship between key space and user performance on reduced keyboards.精简键盘上的键位空间与用户操作表现之间的关系。
Appl Human Sci. 1995 Nov;14(6):287-92. doi: 10.2114/ahs.14.287.
5
Typing Style and the Use of Different Sources of Information during Typing: An Investigation Using Self-Reports.打字风格与打字过程中不同信息来源的使用:一项基于自我报告的调查
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 9;7:1908. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01908. eCollection 2016.
6
Melioration and the transition from touch-typing training to everyday use.改善以及从触摸打字训练到日常使用的转变。
Hum Factors. 2003;45(4):671-84. doi: 10.1518/hfes.45.4.671.27085.
7
Episodic contributions to sequential control: learning from a typist's touch.阶段性贡献于序列控制:从打字员的敲击中学习。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun;36(3):662-72. doi: 10.1037/a0018390.
8
Warning: This keyboard will deconstruct--the role of the keyboard in skilled typewriting.警告:本键盘将解构——键盘在熟练打字中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Jun;17(3):394-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.394.
9
The effects of work pace on within-participant and between-participant keying force, electromyography, and fatigue.工作节奏对参与者内部和参与者之间的按键力、肌电图及疲劳的影响。
Hum Factors. 2002 Spring;44(1):51-61. doi: 10.1518/0018720024494757.
10
Tactile feedback contributes to consistency of finger movements during typing.触觉反馈有助于打字时手指动作的连贯性。
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Apr;155(3):362-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1736-6. Epub 2003 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerebello-Cerebral Pathways Contribute to Written Word Production.小脑-大脑通路有助于书面文字生成。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Aug 14;6. doi: 10.1162/nol.a.10. eCollection 2025.
2
Are fluent letter dyads really fluent? An update on objective and subjective motor fluency in an Italian student population.流畅的字母组合真的流畅吗?意大利学生群体中客观和主观运动流畅性的最新情况。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jul 15;10(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00651-4.
3
Comparing the effects of typing and handwriting on spelling performance in school.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the Deliberate Practice View Defensible? A Review of Evidence and Discussion of Issues.刻意练习观点是否站得住脚?证据综述与问题探讨
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 18;11:1134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01134. eCollection 2020.
2
Deliberate Practice and Proposed Limits on the Effects of Practice on the Acquisition of Expert Performance: Why the Original Definition Matters and Recommendations for Future Research.刻意练习以及关于练习对获得专家级表现影响的拟议限制:为何原始定义很重要以及对未来研究的建议。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 25;10:2396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02396. eCollection 2019.
3
Automatic control: How experts act without thinking.
比较打字和手写对学校拼写成绩的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):17985. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03369-x.
4
Enhanced human sensorimotor integration via self-modulation of the somatosensory activity.通过体感活动的自我调节增强人类感觉运动整合。
iScience. 2025 Mar 3;28(4):112145. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112145. eCollection 2025 Apr 18.
5
Commentary: Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: a high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom.评论:手写而非打字可导致广泛的大脑连接:一项对课堂有启示意义的高密度脑电图研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 8;15:1517235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1517235. eCollection 2024.
自动控制:专家不假思索的行动方式。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Jul;125(4):453-485. doi: 10.1037/rev0000100.
4
Different (key)strokes for different folks: How standard and nonstandard typists balance Fitts' law and Hick's law.因人而异的(关键)击键方式:标准与非标准打字员如何平衡菲茨定律和希克定律。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Dec;42(12):2084-2102. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000272. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
5
Measuring sequences of keystrokes with jsPsych: Reliability of response times and interkeystroke intervals.使用jsPsych测量击键序列:反应时间和按键间隔的可靠性。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Jun;49(3):1163-1176. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0776-3.
6
Two thumbs and one index: A comparison of manual coordination in touch-typing and mobile-typing.两根大拇指和一根食指:触摸打字与拇指打字的手部协调性比较。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Jun;167:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
7
Reconsidering the role of orthographic redundancy in visual word recognition.重新审视正字冗余在视觉单词识别中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 18;6:645. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00645. eCollection 2015.
8
Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: a meta-analysis.刻意练习与音乐、游戏、运动、教育和职业领域的表现:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Aug;25(8):1608-18. doi: 10.1177/0956797614535810. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
9
jsPsych: a JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser.jsPsych:一个在网页浏览器中创建行为实验的 JavaScript 库。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Mar;47(1):1-12. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y.
10
When does word frequency influence written production?词汇频率何时影响书面产出?
Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 24;4:963. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00963. eCollection 2013.