Student Health Services, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Microbiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2225430. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25430.
SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, has displayed person-to-person transmission in a variety of indoor situations. This potential for robust transmission has posed significant challenges and concerns for day-to-day activities of colleges and universities where indoor learning is a focus for students, faculty, and staff.
To assess whether in-class instruction without any physical distancing, but with other public health mitigation strategies, is a risk for driving SARS-CoV-2 transmission.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study examined the evidence for SARS-CoV-2 transmission on a large urban US university campus using contact tracing, class attendance, and whole genome sequencing during the 2021 fall semester. Eligible participants were on-campus and off-campus individuals involved in campus activities. Data were analyzed between September and December 2021.
Participation in class and work activities on a campus with mandated vaccination and indoor masking but that was otherwise fully open without physical distancing during a time of ongoing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, both at the university and in the surrounding counties.
Likelihood of in-class infection was assessed by measuring the genetic distance between all potential in-class transmission pairings using polymerase chain reaction testing.
More than 600 000 polymerase chain reaction tests were conducted throughout the semester, with 896 tests (0.1%) showing detectable SARS-CoV-2; there were over 850 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection identified through weekly surveillance testing of all students and faculty on campus during the fall 2021 semester. The rolling mean average of positive tests ranged between 4 and 27 daily cases. Of more than 140 000 in-person class events and a total student population of 33 000 between graduate and undergraduate students, only 9 instances of potential in-class transmission were identified, accounting for 0.0045% of all classroom meetings.
In this cohort study, the data suggested that under robust transmission abatement strategies, in-class instruction was not an appreciable source of disease transmission.
导致 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2 已在各种室内环境中显示出人与人之间的传播。这种强大的传播潜力给学院和大学的日常活动带来了重大挑战和关注,因为室内学习是学生、教师和员工的重点。
评估在没有任何身体距离但采取其他公共卫生缓解策略的情况下进行课堂教学是否存在导致 SARS-CoV-2 传播的风险。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究使用接触者追踪、课堂出勤率和全基因组测序,在美国一个大型城市大学校园里检查了 2021 年秋季学期期间 SARS-CoV-2 传播的证据。合格参与者包括校内和校外参与校园活动的个人。数据在 2021 年 9 月至 12 月之间进行了分析。
在校园内参加课程和工作活动,校园内强制接种疫苗和室内戴口罩,但在 SARS-CoV-2 持续传播期间,校园内和周围县内没有任何身体距离限制,这两种情况都在进行。
通过使用聚合酶链反应测试测量所有潜在课堂传播对之间的遗传距离来评估课堂内感染的可能性。
整个学期共进行了超过 600000 次聚合酶链反应测试,896 次测试(0.1%)显示出可检测到的 SARS-CoV-2;在 2021 年秋季学期期间,通过对校园内所有学生和教师进行每周监测检测,发现了超过 850 例 SARS-CoV-2 感染病例。阳性测试的滚动平均值每日介于 4 到 27 例之间。在超过 140000 次面对面课堂活动和 33000 名研究生和本科生的总学生人数中,仅确定了 9 例潜在的课堂传播事件,占所有课堂会议的 0.0045%。
在这项队列研究中,数据表明,在强大的传播缓解策略下,课堂教学并不是疾病传播的明显来源。