Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Health Decision Sciences Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):406-413. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07738-4. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
For adults aged 76-85, guidelines recommend individualizing decision-making about whether to continue colorectal cancer (CRC) testing. These conversations can be challenging as they need to consider a patient's CRC risk, life expectancy, and preferences.
To promote shared decision-making (SDM) for CRC testing decisions for older adults.
Two-arm, multi-site cluster randomized trial, assigning physicians to Intervention and Comparator arms. Patients were surveyed shortly after the visit to assess outcomes. Analyses were intention-to-treat.
Primary care physicians affiliated with 5 academic and community hospital networks and their patients aged 76-85 who were due for CRC testing and had a visit during the study period.
Intervention arm physicians completed a 2-h online course in SDM communication skills and received an electronic reminder of patients eligible for CRC testing shortly before the visit. Comparator arm received reminders only.
The primary outcome was patient-reported SDM Process score (range 0-4 with higher scores indicating more SDM); secondary outcomes included patient-reported discussion of CRC screening, knowledge, intention, and satisfaction with the visit.
Sixty-seven physicians (Intervention n=34 and Comparator n=33) enrolled. Patient participants (n=466) were on average 79 years old, 50% with excellent or very good self-rated overall health, and 66% had one or more prior colonoscopies. Patients in the Intervention arm had higher SDM Process scores (adjusted mean difference 0.36 (95%CI (0.08, 0.64), p=0.01) than in the Comparator arm. More patients in the Intervention arm reported discussing CRC screening during the visit (72% vs. 60%, p=0.03) and had higher intention to follow through with their preferred approach (58.0% vs. 47.1, p=0.03). Knowledge scores and visit satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms.
Physician training plus reminders were effective in increasing SDM and frequency of CRC testing discussions in an age group where SDM is essential.
The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03959696).
对于 76-85 岁的成年人,指南建议针对是否继续进行结直肠癌(CRC)检测做出个体化决策。这些对话具有挑战性,因为它们需要考虑患者的 CRC 风险、预期寿命和偏好。
促进针对老年患者 CRC 检测决策的共同决策(SDM)。
双臂、多站点聚类随机试验,将医生分配到干预组和对照组。患者在就诊后不久接受调查,以评估结果。分析采用意向治疗。
隶属于 5 个学术和社区医院网络的初级保健医生及其年龄在 76-85 岁之间、正处于 CRC 检测期且在研究期间就诊的患者。
干预组医生完成了 2 小时的 SDM 沟通技巧在线课程,并在就诊前收到电子提醒,提醒他们有患者符合 CRC 检测条件。对照组只收到提醒。
主要结果是患者报告的 SDM 过程评分(范围为 0-4,得分越高表示 SDM 越多);次要结果包括患者报告的 CRC 筛查讨论、知识、意向以及对就诊的满意度。
67 名医生(干预组 n=34 名,对照组 n=33 名)参与了研究。患者参与者(n=466)平均年龄为 79 岁,50%的患者自我评估整体健康状况为优秀或非常好,66%的患者曾接受过一次或多次结肠镜检查。干预组的 SDM 过程评分较高(调整后的平均差异为 0.36(95%CI(0.08,0.64),p=0.01),比对照组高。干预组有更多的患者报告在就诊期间讨论了 CRC 筛查(72% vs. 60%,p=0.03),并且更倾向于按照自己的首选方法进行后续治疗(58.0% vs. 47.1%,p=0.03)。知识得分和就诊满意度在两组之间没有显著差异。
在需要 SDM 的年龄组中,医生培训加提醒可有效增加 SDM 和 CRC 检测讨论的频率。
该试验在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(NCT03959696)。