Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(3):3555-3566. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5172. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
Thousands of colonoscopies were canceled during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic. As facilities resumed services, some patients were hesitant to reschedule. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a decision aid plus telephone coaching would increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and improve patient reports of shared decision making (SDM). A randomized controlled trial assigned adults aged 45-75 without prior history of CRC who had a colonoscopy canceled from March to May 2020 to intervention (n = 400) or usual care control (n = 400) arms. The intervention arm received three-page decision aid and call from decision coach from September 2020 through November 2020. Screening rates were collected at 6 months. A subset (n = 250) in each arm was surveyed 8 weeks after randomization to assess SDM (scores range 0-4, higher scores indicating more SDM), decisional conflict, and screening preference. The sample was on average, 60 years old, 53% female, 74% White, non-Hispanic, and 11% Spanish speaking. More intervention arm patients were screened within 6 months (35% intervention vs 23% control, p < 0.001). The intervention respondents reported higher SDM scores (mean difference 0.7 [0.4, 0.9], p < 0.001) and less decisional conflict than controls (-21% [-35%, -7%], p = 0.003). The majority in both arms preferred screening versus delaying (68% intervention vs. 65% control, p = 0.75). An SDM approach that offered alternatives and incorporated patients' preferences resulted in higher screening rates. Patients who are overdue for CRC screening may benefit from proactive outreach with SDM support.
数千例结肠镜检查在 COVID-19 大流行初期被取消。随着医疗机构恢复服务,一些患者对重新安排检查犹豫不决。本研究旨在确定决策辅助加电话辅导是否会增加结直肠癌(CRC)筛查并改善患者对共同决策(SDM)的报告。一项随机对照试验将年龄在 45-75 岁之间、无结直肠癌既往史且 2020 年 3 月至 5 月结肠镜检查被取消的成年人分配到干预组(n=400)或常规护理对照组(n=400)。干预组在 2020 年 9 月至 11 月期间收到三页决策辅助和决策教练的电话。在 6 个月时收集筛查率。每个组中的一个亚组(n=250)在随机分组后 8 周进行调查,以评估 SDM(评分范围 0-4,分数越高表示 SDM 越高)、决策冲突和筛查偏好。样本平均年龄为 60 岁,53%为女性,74%为白人,非西班牙裔,11%为西班牙语。干预组中更多的患者在 6 个月内接受了筛查(35%干预组 vs 23%对照组,p<0.001)。干预组的回应者报告 SDM 评分更高(平均差异 0.7 [0.4, 0.9],p<0.001),决策冲突更少(-21% [-35%, -7%],p=0.003)。两组的大多数人都更喜欢筛查而不是延迟(68%干预组 vs. 65%对照组,p=0.75)。提供替代方案并纳入患者偏好的 SDM 方法可提高筛查率。因结直肠癌筛查而逾期的患者可能受益于具有 SDM 支持的积极外展。