• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定高强度间歇训练计划:一项评估与学生和教师共同设计高强度间歇训练课程的可行性和效果的研究方案。

Making a HIIT: study protocol for assessing the feasibility and effects of co-designing high-intensity interval training workouts with students and teachers.

机构信息

School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.

Children's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2022 Aug 5;22(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03440-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-022-03440-w
PMID:35931968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9354328/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is an effective strategy for improving a variety of health outcomes within the school setting. However, there is limited research on the implementation of school-based HIIT interventions and the integration of HIIT within the Health and Physical Education (HPE) curriculum. The aims of the Making a HIIT study are to: 1) describe the methodology and evaluate the feasibility of co-designing HIIT workouts with students and teachers in HPE; 2) determine the effect of co-designed HIIT workouts on cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and executive function; 3) understand the effect of co-design on students' motivation, enjoyment, and self-efficacy towards the workouts; and 4) evaluate the implementation of the intervention.

METHODS

Three schools will participate. Within each school, three different groups will be formed from Year 7 and 8 classes: 1) Co-Designers; 2) HIIT Only; and 3) Control. The study will include two phases. In phase one, Group 1 will co-design HIIT workouts as part of the HPE curriculum using an iterative process with the researcher, teacher, and students as collaborators. This process will be evaluated using student discussions, student surveys, and teacher interviews. In phase two, Groups 1 and 2 will use the co-designed 10-minute HIIT workouts in HPE for 8-weeks. Group 3 (control) will continue their regular HPE lessons. All students will participate in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular fitness, and executive function assessments before and after the HIIT program or control period. Students will complete questionnaires on their motivation, enjoyment, and self-efficacy of the workouts. Differences between groups will be assessed using linear regressions to account for covariates. Heart rate and rating of perceived exertion will be collected during each HIIT session. The implementation will be evaluated using the Framework for Effective Implementation. Ethical approval was granted by the University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee and other relevant bodies.

DISCUSSION

This study will be the first to co-design HIIT workouts with teachers and students within the HPE curriculum. As this study relies on co-design, each HIIT workout will differ, which will add variability between HIIT workouts but increase the ecological validity of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN, ACTRN12622000534785, Registered 5 April 2022 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000534785.aspx.

摘要

背景

高强度间歇训练(HIIT)是在学校环境中改善各种健康结果的有效策略。然而,关于基于学校的 HIIT 干预措施的实施以及将 HIIT 融入健康和体育教育(HPE)课程的研究有限。“制作 HIIT”研究的目的是:1)描述与 HPE 中的学生和教师共同设计 HIIT 锻炼的方法,并评估其可行性;2)确定共同设计的 HIIT 锻炼对心肺和肌肉健康以及执行功能的影响;3)了解共同设计对学生对锻炼的动机、享受和自我效能的影响;4)评估干预措施的实施情况。

方法

将有 3 所学校参与。在每所学校中,将从 7 年级和 8 年级的班级中组成 3 个不同的小组:1)共同设计者;2)仅 HIIT;3)对照组。该研究将包括两个阶段。在第一阶段,第 1 组将与研究人员、教师和学生一起,通过迭代过程共同设计 HIIT 锻炼,作为 HPE 课程的一部分。将使用学生讨论、学生调查和教师访谈来评估此过程。在第二阶段,第 1 组和第 2 组将在 HPE 中使用共同设计的 10 分钟 HIIT 锻炼 8 周。第 3 组(对照组)将继续进行常规的 HPE 课程。所有学生将在 HIIT 计划或对照期之前和之后参加心肺功能、肌肉力量和执行功能评估。学生将完成关于他们对锻炼的动机、享受和自我效能的问卷。将使用线性回归来评估组间差异,以考虑协变量。在每次 HIIT 期间,将收集心率和感知用力程度。将使用有效的实施框架来评估实施情况。昆士兰大学人类研究伦理委员会和其他相关机构已批准该研究的伦理。

讨论

这将是首次在 HPE 课程中与教师和学生共同设计 HIIT 锻炼。由于本研究依赖于共同设计,因此每个 HIIT 锻炼都会有所不同,这将增加 HIIT 锻炼之间的变异性,但会增加研究的生态有效性。

试验注册

ACTRN,ACTRN12622000534785,注册于 2022 年 4 月 5 日-回顾性注册,https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000534785.aspx。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc75/9354328/c31154825aa9/12887_2022_3440_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc75/9354328/c31154825aa9/12887_2022_3440_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc75/9354328/c31154825aa9/12887_2022_3440_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Making a HIIT: study protocol for assessing the feasibility and effects of co-designing high-intensity interval training workouts with students and teachers.制定高强度间歇训练计划:一项评估与学生和教师共同设计高强度间歇训练课程的可行性和效果的研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Aug 5;22(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03440-w.
2
Was it a HIIT? A process evaluation of a school-based high-intensity interval training intervention.这是高强度间歇训练(HIIT)吗?基于学校的高强度间歇训练干预的过程评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 29;21(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01599-2.
3
Making a HIIT: co-design of high-intensity interval training workouts with students & teachers within the curriculum.在课程中与学生和教师共同设计高强度间歇训练课程。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):1795. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16613-8.
4
Making a HIIT: Methods for quantifying intensity in high-intensity interval training in schools and validity of session rating of perceived exertion.制定高强度间歇训练方案:学校高强度间歇训练强度量化方法及主观用力感觉训练课评分的有效性
J Sports Sci. 2023 Sep;41(18):1678-1686. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2023.2291736. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
Efficacy and feasibility of HIIT training for university students: The Uni-HIIT RCT.高强度间歇训练对大学生的效果和可行性:Uni-HIIT RCT 研究。
J Sci Med Sport. 2019 May;22(5):596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
6
School-based physical activity intervention for older adolescents: rationale and study protocol for the Burn 2 Learn cluster randomised controlled trial.基于学校的身体活动干预对青少年的影响:Burn 2 Learn 群组随机对照试验的基本原理和研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 22;9(5):e026029. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026029.
7
An Internet-supported Physical Activity Intervention Delivered in Secondary Schools Located in Low Socio-economic Status Communities: Study Protocol for the Activity and Motivation in Physical Education (AMPED) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.一项在社会经济地位较低社区的中学开展的互联网支持的体育活动干预:体育活动与动机(AMPED)整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 6;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2583-7.
8
Increasing students' physical activity during school physical education: rationale and protocol for the SELF-FIT cluster randomized controlled trial.在学校体育课中增加学生的体育活动:SELF-FIT 整群随机对照试验的基本原理与方案
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 11;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4553-8.
9
Children's Enjoyment, Perceived Competency, and Vigorous Physical Activity During High-Intensity Interval Training in Physical Education.儿童在体育教育中的高强度间歇训练中的乐趣、感知能力和剧烈身体活动。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2022 Dec;93(4):835-844. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2021.1925207. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
10
Scaling-up an efficacious school-based physical activity intervention: Study protocol for the 'Internet-based Professional Learning to help teachers support Activity in Youth' (iPLAY) cluster randomized controlled trial and scale-up implementation evaluation.扩大一项有效的校内体育活动干预措施:“基于互联网的专业学习以帮助教师支持青少年活动”(iPLAY)整群随机对照试验及扩大实施评估的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3243-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a school-based high-intensity interval training intervention in adolescents: study protocol of the cluster randomised controlled trial.一项针对青少年的校内高强度间歇训练干预措施的效果:整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Pediatr. 2024 Oct 29;12:1458610. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1458610. eCollection 2024.
2
Was it a HIIT? A process evaluation of a school-based high-intensity interval training intervention.这是高强度间歇训练(HIIT)吗?基于学校的高强度间歇训练干预的过程评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 29;21(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01599-2.
3
Making a HIIT: co-design of high-intensity interval training workouts with students & teachers within the curriculum.

本文引用的文献

1
Using a Co-design Approach to Create Tools to Facilitate Physical Activity in Children With Physical Disabilities.采用协同设计方法创建工具以促进身体残疾儿童的体育活动。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Nov 15;2:707612. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.707612. eCollection 2021.
2
School-based high-intensity interval training programs in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.学校为基础的高强度间歇训练计划在儿童和青少年中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0266427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266427. eCollection 2022.
3
Process Evaluation of Project FFAB (Fun Fast Activity Blasts): A Multi-Activity School-Based High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention.
在课程中与学生和教师共同设计高强度间歇训练课程。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):1795. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16613-8.
4
Analysis of College Students' Psychological Education Management in Public Emergencies Based on Big Data.基于大数据的突发公共事件下大学生心理教育管理分析。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Sep 19;2022:2654437. doi: 10.1155/2022/2654437. eCollection 2022.
FFAB项目(趣味快速活动爆发)的过程评估:一项基于学校的多活动高强度间歇训练干预措施
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Sep 20;3:737900. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.737900. eCollection 2021.
4
Time-efficient intervention to improve older adolescents' cardiorespiratory fitness: findings from the 'Burn 2 Learn' cluster randomised controlled trial.提高大龄青少年心肺适能的高效干预措施:“燃烧学习”整群随机对照试验的结果
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec 21;55(13):751-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103277.
5
Process Evaluation of a School-Based High-Intensity Interval Training Program for Older Adolescents: The Burn 2 Learn Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.一项针对青少年的校内高强度间歇训练计划的过程评估:“燃烧2学习”整群随机对照试验
Children (Basel). 2020 Dec 16;7(12):299. doi: 10.3390/children7120299.
6
A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control.一种改进注意力控制测量的工具箱方法。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Feb;150(2):242-275. doi: 10.1037/xge0000783. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
7
Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants.全球青少年身体活动不足趋势:298 项基于人群调查的汇总分析,涉及 160 万参与者。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Jan;4(1):23-35. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
9
Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions.在公共卫生干预措施的共同创造和评估中运用参与式方法的框架、原则和建议。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 9;5:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9. eCollection 2019.
10
Associations of Objectively Measured Vigorous Physical Activity With Body Composition, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Cardiometabolic Health in Youth: A Review.青少年中客观测量的剧烈身体活动与身体成分、心肺适能和心脏代谢健康的关联:一项综述
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016 Jan 6;13(1):61-97. doi: 10.1177/1559827615624417. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.