1Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine.
2Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; and.
J Neurosurg. 2022 Aug 5;138(4):1016-1027. doi: 10.3171/2022.6.JNS212904. Print 2023 Apr 1.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD) is traditionally performed with awake intraoperative testing and/or microelectrode recording. Recently, however, the procedure has been increasingly performed under general anesthesia with image-based verification. The authors sought to compare structural and functional networks engaged by awake and asleep PD-DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and correlate them with clinical outcomes.
Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), pre- and postoperative motor scores on the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III), and total electrical energy delivered (TEED) at 6 months were retroactively assessed in patients with PD who received implants of bilateral DBS leads. In subset analysis, implanted electrodes were reconstructed using the Lead-DBS toolbox. Volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) were used as seed points in group volumetric and connectivity analysis.
The clinical courses of 122 patients (52 asleep, 70 awake) were reviewed. Operating room and procedure times were significantly shorter in asleep cases. LEDD reduction, MDS-UPDRS III score improvement, and TEED at the 6-month follow-up did not differ between groups. In subset analysis (n = 40), proximity of active contact, VTA overlap, and desired network fiber counts with motor STN correlated with lower DBS energy requirement and improved motor scores. Discriminative structural fiber tracts involving supplementary motor area, thalamus, and brainstem were associated with optimal clinical improvement. Areas of highest structural and functional connectivity with VTAs did not significantly differ between the two groups.
Compared to awake STN DBS, asleep procedures can achieve similarly optimal targeting-based on clinical outcomes, electrode placement, and connectivity estimates-in more efficient procedures and shorter operating room times.
深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗帕金森病(PD)传统上是在清醒状态下进行术中测试和/或微电极记录。然而,最近该手术越来越多地在全麻下进行,采用基于图像的验证。作者旨在比较清醒和睡眠状态下丘脑底核(STN)DBS 治疗 PD 时激活的结构和功能网络,并将其与临床结果相关联。
回顾性评估接受双侧 DBS 导联植入的 PD 患者的左旋多巴等效日剂量(LEDD)、术前和术后运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分(MDS-UPDRS III)运动评分,以及 6 个月时的总电能量输送(TEED)。在亚组分析中,使用 Lead-DBS 工具箱重建植入的电极。组织激活体积(VTA)用作群体体积和连通性分析的种子点。
共回顾了 122 名患者(52 例睡眠,70 例清醒)的临床过程。在睡眠组中,手术室和手术时间明显缩短。两组间的 LEDD 降低、MDS-UPDRS III 评分改善和 6 个月时的 TEED 无差异。在亚组分析(n = 40)中,活性接触的接近度、VTA 重叠和期望的 STN 运动网络纤维计数与较低的 DBS 能量需求和改善的运动评分相关。与最佳临床改善相关的是涉及辅助运动区、丘脑和脑干的有区别的结构纤维束。与 VTA 具有最高结构和功能连通性的区域在两组之间没有显著差异。
与清醒 STN DBS 相比,睡眠程序可以在更有效和手术室时间更短的情况下,通过临床结果、电极放置和连通性估计,实现同样优化的靶向治疗。