• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在连作田中,土壤性质、根际细菌群落和植物性能对熏蒸和生物制剂处理的反应各不相同。

Soil properties, rhizosphere bacterial community, and plant performance respond differently to fumigation and bioagent treatment in continuous cropping fields.

作者信息

Xiong Jing, Peng Shuguang, Liu Yongjun, Yin Huaqun, Zhou Lei, Zhou Zhicheng, Tan Ge, Gu Yabing, Zhang Hetian, Huang Jingyi, Meng Delong

机构信息

School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Tobacco Research Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 22;13:923405. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.923405. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2022.923405
PMID:35935223
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9354655/
Abstract

Continuous cropping barriers lead to huge agriculture production losses, and fumigation and biological agents are developed to alleviate the barriers. However, there is a lack of literature on the differences between strong chemical fumigant treatment and moderate biological agent treatment. In this study, we investigated those differences and attempted to establish the links between soil properties, rhizosphere microbial community, and plant performance in both fumigation- and bioagent-treated fields. The results showed that the fumigation had a stronger effect on both soil functional microbes, i.e., ammonia oxidizers and soil-borne bacterial pathogens, and therefore, led to a significant change in soil properties, higher fertilizer efficiency, lower disease infections, and improved plant growth, compared with untreated control fields. Biological treatment caused less changes to soil properties, rhizosphere bacterial community, and plant physiology. Correlation and modeling analyses revealed that the bioagent effect was mainly direct, whereas fumigation resulted in indirect effects on alleviating cropping barriers. A possible explanation would be the reconstruction of the soil microbial community by the fumigation process, which would subsequently lead to changes in soil characteristics and plant performance, resulting in the effective alleviation of continuous cropping barriers.

摘要

连作障碍导致农业生产遭受巨大损失,人们开发了熏蒸法和生物制剂来缓解这些障碍。然而,关于强化学熏蒸剂处理和中度生物制剂处理之间差异的文献却很匮乏。在本研究中,我们调查了这些差异,并试图在熏蒸处理和生物制剂处理的田地中建立土壤性质、根际微生物群落与植物表现之间的联系。结果表明,与未处理的对照田相比,熏蒸对土壤功能微生物(即氨氧化菌和土传细菌病原体)的影响更强,因此导致土壤性质发生显著变化、肥料效率提高、病害感染减少以及植物生长改善。生物处理对土壤性质、根际细菌群落和植物生理的影响较小。相关性和模型分析表明,生物制剂的作用主要是直接的,而熏蒸对缓解连作障碍产生的是间接影响。一个可能的解释是熏蒸过程对土壤微生物群落的重建,这随后会导致土壤特性和植物表现的变化,从而有效缓解连作障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/5f73f26395d8/fmicb-13-923405-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/5fafb84b30e1/fmicb-13-923405-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/5b1988486e83/fmicb-13-923405-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/bae23899f0d9/fmicb-13-923405-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/a34e6d19dcc5/fmicb-13-923405-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/d7999fc6de10/fmicb-13-923405-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/5f73f26395d8/fmicb-13-923405-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/5fafb84b30e1/fmicb-13-923405-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/5b1988486e83/fmicb-13-923405-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/bae23899f0d9/fmicb-13-923405-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/a34e6d19dcc5/fmicb-13-923405-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/d7999fc6de10/fmicb-13-923405-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5828/9354655/5f73f26395d8/fmicb-13-923405-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Soil properties, rhizosphere bacterial community, and plant performance respond differently to fumigation and bioagent treatment in continuous cropping fields.在连作田中,土壤性质、根际细菌群落和植物性能对熏蒸和生物制剂处理的反应各不相同。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 22;13:923405. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.923405. eCollection 2022.
2
Fumigation practice combined with organic fertilizer increase antibiotic resistance in watermelon rhizosphere soil.熏蒸实践与有机肥结合增加了西瓜根际土壤中的抗生素抗性。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 20;805:150426. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150426. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
3
Effects of fumigation with 1,3-dichloropropene on soil enzyme activities and microbial communities in continuous-cropping soil.1,3-二氯丙烯熏蒸对连作土壤酶活性和微生物群落的影响。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 Mar;169:730-736. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.071. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
4
Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Communities of Continuous Cropping-Tolerant and Sensitive Soybean Genotypes Respond Differently to Long-Term Continuous Cropping in Mollisols.耐连作与敏感大豆基因型根际土壤细菌群落对 Mollisols 中长期连作的响应不同。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Sep 13;12:729047. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.729047. eCollection 2021.
5
Long-term effects of chloropicrin fumigation on soil microbe recovery and growth promotion of .氯化苦熏蒸对土壤微生物恢复及[植物名称]生长促进的长期影响 (原文中“growth promotion of”后面缺少具体内容)
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jul 14;14:1225944. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1225944. eCollection 2023.
6
[Effects of continuous cropping on bacterial community diversity in rhizosphere soil of Rehmannia glutinosa].[连作对地黄根际土壤细菌群落多样性的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2010 Nov;21(11):2843-8.
7
Earthworm activity optimized the rhizosphere bacterial community structure and further alleviated the yield loss in continuous cropping lily (Lilium lancifolium Thunb.).蚯蚓活动优化了根际细菌群落结构,进一步缓解了连作百合(Lilium lancifolium Thunb.)的产量损失。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99597-y.
8
Manipulating the soil microbiomes during a community recovery process with plant beneficial species for the suppression of Fusarium wilt of watermelon.在群落恢复过程中,利用植物有益物种操纵土壤微生物群落以抑制西瓜枯萎病。
AMB Express. 2021 Jun 12;11(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13568-021-01225-5.
9
Impact of Biochar on Rhizosphere Bacterial Diversity Restoration Following Chloropicrin Fumigation of Planted Soil.生物炭对氯吡虫啉熏蒸种植土壤后根际细菌多样性恢复的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;19(4):2126. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042126.
10
Dazomet fumigation modification of the soil microorganism community and promotion of growth.棉隆熏蒸对土壤微生物群落的改良及生长促进作用
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jul 26;15:1443526. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1443526. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Convergent-divergent succession of soil microbial communities driven by continuous maize cropping duration via heterogeneous selection processes.通过异质选择过程,连续玉米种植持续时间驱动土壤微生物群落的趋异-趋同演替。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jun 23;16:1618629. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1618629. eCollection 2025.
2
Diversity and function of soybean rhizosphere microbiome under nature farming.自然农法下大豆根际微生物群落的多样性与功能
Front Microbiol. 2023 Mar 1;14:1130969. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1130969. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Soil potentials to resist continuous cropping obstacle: Three field cases.土壤对连作障碍的抵抗力:三个田间实例。
Environ Res. 2021 Sep;200:111319. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111319. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
Intercropping With Turmeric or Ginger Reduce the Continuous Cropping Obstacles That Affect (Patchouli).与姜黄或生姜间作可减少影响广藿香的连作障碍。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Oct 8;11:579719. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.579719. eCollection 2020.
3
Plant-microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health.植物-微生物组相互作用:从群落组装到植物健康。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020 Nov;18(11):607-621. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
4
Benefits of intensive agricultural intercropping.集约农业间作的益处。
Nat Plants. 2020 Jun;6(6):604-605. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0677-4.
5
Effects of FKM10 for Promoting the Growth of Rehd. and Inhibiting .FKM10促进Rehd.生长及抑制……的作用 (原文表述不完整,翻译可能不准确,仅供参考)
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jan 10;10:2889. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02889. eCollection 2019.
6
Effects of multi-year biofumigation on soil bacterial and fungal communities and strawberry yield.多年生物熏蒸对土壤细菌和真菌群落及草莓产量的影响。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Jan;256:113415. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113415. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
7
Evolutions of different microbial populations and the relationships with matrix properties during agricultural waste composting with amendment of iron (hydr)oxide nanoparticles.不同微生物种群的演变及其与添加铁(氢)氧化物纳米颗粒的农业废物堆肥中基质特性的关系。
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Oct;289:121697. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121697. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
8
Chloropicrin alternated with biofumigation increases crop yield and modifies soil bacterial and fungal communities in strawberry production.氯氰菊酯与生物熏蒸交替使用可提高草莓产量并改变土壤细菌和真菌群落。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jul 20;675:615-622. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.222. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
9
Responses of phyllosphere microbiota and plant health to application of two different biocontrol agents.叶际微生物群和植物健康对两种不同生物防治剂施用的响应。
AMB Express. 2019 Mar 28;9(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13568-019-0765-x.
10
Effects of redox potential on soil cadmium solubility: Insight into microbial community.氧化还原电位对土壤镉溶解度的影响:微生物群落的启示。
J Environ Sci (China). 2019 Jan;75:224-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Apr 3.