• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习曲线中的伦理问题。

Ethics on the Learning Curve.

作者信息

Rao Sanjay

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Narayana Health Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2022 Mar-Apr;27(2):191-195. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_364_20. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

DOI:10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_364_20
PMID:35937115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9350650/
Abstract

Advances in surgical techniques and technologies require surgeons to constantly retrain and adopt these into their practices. Until the surgeon gains proficiency in the new technique, he is said to be on the learning curve. During this time, the patient is at higher risk of adverse outcomes. This poses significant ethical challenges. Several factors impact the surgeon's decision-making and ability to obtain a truly informed consent. These factors include personal bias - both the surgeons and the patients, absence of high-quality evidence, and market forces. This paper describes the ethical dilemmas faced by surgeons as they adopt newer technologies into their practice. It suggests measures that can ensure that surgical progress does not happen at the cost of patient safety.

摘要

手术技术和科技的进步要求外科医生不断重新培训并将这些技术应用到他们的实际操作中。在外科医生熟练掌握新技术之前,据说他正处于学习曲线阶段。在此期间,患者出现不良后果的风险更高。这带来了重大的伦理挑战。有几个因素会影响外科医生的决策以及获得真正知情同意的能力。这些因素包括个人偏见——外科医生和患者双方的偏见、缺乏高质量证据以及市场力量。本文描述了外科医生在将更新的技术应用于实际操作时所面临的伦理困境。它提出了一些措施,以确保手术的进步不以患者安全为代价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/0b3e26aa698f/JIAPS-27-191-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/24d3b3cb23d4/JIAPS-27-191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/3a38f3dbc23d/JIAPS-27-191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/63fd253a5d52/JIAPS-27-191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/e1cc7d6f2702/JIAPS-27-191-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/0b3e26aa698f/JIAPS-27-191-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/24d3b3cb23d4/JIAPS-27-191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/3a38f3dbc23d/JIAPS-27-191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/63fd253a5d52/JIAPS-27-191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/e1cc7d6f2702/JIAPS-27-191-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2781/9350650/0b3e26aa698f/JIAPS-27-191-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Ethics on the Learning Curve.学习曲线中的伦理问题。
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2022 Mar-Apr;27(2):191-195. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_364_20. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
When does the 'learning curve' of innovative interventions become questionable practice?创新干预措施的“学习曲线”何时会成为有问题的做法?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Sep;36(3):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
3
Ethical issues associated with the introduction of new surgical devices, or just because we can, doesn't mean we should.与引入新手术设备相关的伦理问题,或者仅仅因为我们能够做到,并不意味着我们就应该这样做。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Jun;30(6):508-513. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32867-5.
4
Understanding and Taking Control of Surgical Learning Curves.理解并掌控手术学习曲线
Instr Course Lect. 2016;65:623-31.
5
Ethical issues in surgical innovation.外科创新中的伦理问题。
World J Surg. 2014 Jul;38(7):1638-43. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2568-1.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
8
Anesthesiological ethics: can informed consent be implied?
J Clin Ethics. 2012 Spring;23(1):68-70.
9
Surgery during COVID-19 crisis conditions: can we protect our ethical integrity against the odds?在 COVID-19 危机期间进行手术:我们能否在逆境中保护我们的伦理完整性?
J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):505-507. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106446. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
10
Do surgeons and patients discuss what they document on consent forms?外科医生和患者会讨论他们在同意书上记录的内容吗?
J Surg Res. 2015 Jul;197(1):67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.058. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Transvaginal mesh in Australia: An analysis of news media reporting from 1996 to 2021.澳大利亚经阴道网片:1996 年至 2021 年新闻媒体报道分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1189-1201. doi: 10.1111/hex.13734. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Discrepancies in Self-Reported and Actual Conflicts of Interest for Robotic Pediatric Urological Surgery.机器人小儿泌尿外科手术中自我报告和实际利益冲突的差异。
J Urol. 2019 Feb;201(2):393-399. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.043.
2
Sponsoring surgeons: An investigation on the influence of the da Vinci robot.主刀医师:达芬奇机器人的影响调查
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):84-87. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
3
Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?循证医学:一场危机中的运动?
BMJ. 2014 Jun 13;348:g3725. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3725.
4
Ethics and surgical innovation: challenges to the professionalism of surgeons.伦理与外科创新:外科医生职业精神面临的挑战。
Int J Surg. 2013;11 Suppl 1:S2-5. doi: 10.1016/S1743-9191(13)60003-5.
5
Innovative surgery: the ethical challenges.创新手术:伦理挑战。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jan;38(1):9-12. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.042150. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
6
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.未经评估,不得进行手术创新:IDEAL 建议
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8.
7
Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.评估手术创新的挑战。
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1097-104. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61086-2.
8
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations.外科创新的评估与阶段
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1089-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7.
9
When does the 'learning curve' of innovative interventions become questionable practice?创新干预措施的“学习曲线”何时会成为有问题的做法?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Sep;36(3):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
10
Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000-2005.营利性和非营利性组织资助的主要心血管临床试验报告的结果:2000 - 2005年。
JAMA. 2006 May 17;295(19):2270-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.19.2270.