• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自黏流动复合树脂与树脂型窝沟封闭剂临床性能比较:儿科患者的随机临床试验。

Comparison of the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-based pit and fissure sealant: a randomized clinical trial in pediatric patients.

机构信息

Endodontology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Social Determinants on Oral Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04449-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-04449-6
PMID:39143632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11325582/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-adhering flowable composites are an innovative step in reducing the chair time of pit and fissure sealant treatment. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite (SELF-ADH) and resin-based pit and fissure sealant (RBs).

METHODS

This is a double-blinded, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial conducted on 80 fully erupted permanent mandibular first molars from 40 children aged 6 to 12 years. For each participant, two permanent molars were randomly treated with SELF-ADH or RB. All sealants were assessed at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups considering retention, marginal integrity, marginal discolouration, colour matching, surface texture, and caries recurrence. To analyse the data, logistic regression and Fisher's exact tests were used (significance level P < 0.05).

RESULTS

At the 12-month follow-up, the number of fully retained sealants in the SELF-ADH group was significantly higher than that in the RB group (P < 0.001). Also, The success rate of marginal integrity in the SELF-ADH group was significantly greater than the the RB group (P = 0.031), while the rate of sealant marginal discolouration was higher in the RB group (P < 0.001). The incidence of recurrent caries in teeth with partial loss of sealant in both groups (P = 0.004, P < 0.001) increased significantly over time.

CONCLUSION

The retention and marginal integrity of the self-adhering flowable composite were significantly greater than those of the resin-based sealant. Therefore, due to the small number of work steps, flowable self-adhering composites can be used as alternatives to resin-based pit and fissure sealants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kerman University of Medical Sciences with the code IR.KMU.REC.1399.556 and Iraninan Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) code IRCT20180521039763N4, as well as full compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

摘要

背景

自黏流动复合树脂在减少窝沟封闭治疗椅时间方面是一个创新的步骤。本研究旨在比较自黏流动复合树脂(SELF-ADH)和树脂基窝沟封闭剂(RBs)的临床性能。

方法

这是一项双盲、随机、分口临床试验,共纳入 40 名 6-12 岁儿童的 80 颗完全萌出的下颌第一恒磨牙。对于每个参与者,两颗恒磨牙随机用 SELF-ADH 或 RB 处理。所有封闭剂在 3、6 和 12 个月的随访中,根据保留情况、边缘完整性、边缘变色、颜色匹配、表面纹理和龋齿复发进行评估。为了分析数据,使用逻辑回归和 Fisher 确切检验(显著性水平 P<0.05)。

结果

在 12 个月的随访中,SELF-ADH 组完全保留的封闭剂数量明显高于 RB 组(P<0.001)。此外,SELF-ADH 组边缘完整性的成功率明显大于 RB 组(P=0.031),而 RB 组的封闭剂边缘变色率较高(P<0.001)。两组中部分封闭剂丢失的牙齿的龋齿复发率随着时间的推移显著增加(P=0.004,P<0.001)。

结论

自黏流动复合树脂的保留率和边缘完整性明显大于树脂基封闭剂。因此,由于操作步骤较少,流动自黏复合树脂可以替代树脂基窝沟封闭剂。

试验注册

本研究得到了克尔曼医科大学伦理委员会的批准,注册号为 IR.KMU.REC.1399.556 和伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT)注册号 IRCT20180521039763N4,并且完全符合《赫尔辛基宣言》。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1094/11325582/f1ce7b902f10/12903_2024_4449_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1094/11325582/85d3dda8bad5/12903_2024_4449_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1094/11325582/f1ce7b902f10/12903_2024_4449_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1094/11325582/85d3dda8bad5/12903_2024_4449_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1094/11325582/f1ce7b902f10/12903_2024_4449_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the clinical performance of self-adhering flowable composite and resin-based pit and fissure sealant: a randomized clinical trial in pediatric patients.自黏流动复合树脂与树脂型窝沟封闭剂临床性能比较:儿科患者的随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04449-6.
2
Evaluation of Different Fissure Sealant Materials and Flowable Composites Used as Pit-and-fissure Sealants: A 24-Month Clinical Trial.不同窝沟封闭剂材料及用作窝沟封闭剂的流动复合树脂的评估:一项24个月的临床试验
Pediatr Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;37(5):468-73.
3
Clinical Evaluation of the Retention of Self-adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in 6-9-year-old Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.6-9岁儿童中自粘性流动复合树脂作为窝沟封闭剂的保留情况的临床评估:一项随机对照试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):322-326. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2382.
4
Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.一种流动复合树脂与窝沟封闭剂的临床比较:一项为期24个月的半口、随机对照研究。
J Dent. 2014 Feb;42(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
5
Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An one-year comparative evaluation.窝沟封闭剂与流动复合树脂的保留情况:一年期对比评估。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;37(4):372-377. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_122_19.
6
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.用于预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂与氟化物涂剂对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;11(11):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub5.
7
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.窝沟封闭剂与氟化物漆预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 18;2016(1):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub4.
8
Comparative evaluation of retention, marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration of hydrophilic and hydrophobic pit and fissure sealants: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial.亲水型和疏水型窝沟封闭剂保留率、边缘适合性和边缘变色的比较评价:一项分口随机对照试验。
Dent Med Probl. 2024 Jul-Aug;61(4):541-548. doi: 10.17219/dmp/149732.
9
Marginal Microleakage of Conventional Fissure Sealants and Self-Adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth.传统窝沟封闭剂与自粘结可流动复合树脂作为恒牙窝沟封闭剂的边缘微渗漏情况。
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Jun;12(6):430-5.
10
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Resin-based Pit and Fissure Sealant and Self-adhering Flowable Composite: An Study.树脂基窝沟封闭剂与自粘结可流动复合树脂的临床对比评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):430-434. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1552. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Evaluation of the Retention of Self-adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in 6-9-year-old Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.6-9岁儿童中自粘性流动复合树脂作为窝沟封闭剂的保留情况的临床评估:一项随机对照试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):322-326. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2382.
2
Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.填充型和非填充型树脂类窝沟封闭剂成功率的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Front Dent. 2022 Feb 8;19:10. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i10.8855. eCollection 2022.
3
Does a Self-adhesive Flowable Resin Composite Perform Similarly to Highly Filled and Conventional Flowable Resin Composites in Occlusal Cavities? A 2-year Follow-up Study.
自粘接流动树脂复合材料在咬合面窝洞中的性能是否与高填料流动树脂复合材料和传统流动树脂复合材料相似?一项为期 2 年的随访研究。
J Adhes Dent. 2021 Dec 3;23(6):497-503. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b2288205.
4
Dawn of a New Age Fissure Sealant? A Study Evaluating the Clinical Performance of Embrace WetBond and ART Sealants: Results from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.新时代窝沟封闭剂的曙光?一项评估Embrace WetBond和非创伤性修复治疗(ART)窝沟封闭剂临床性能的研究:一项随机对照临床试验的结果
Eur J Dent. 2019 Oct;13(4):503-509. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1696894. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
5
Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An one-year comparative evaluation.窝沟封闭剂与流动复合树脂的保留情况:一年期对比评估。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Oct-Dec;37(4):372-377. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_122_19.
6
Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Resin-based Pit and Fissure Sealant and Self-adhering Flowable Composite: An Study.树脂基窝沟封闭剂与自粘结可流动复合树脂的临床对比评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):430-434. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1552. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
7
Flowable composite as fissure sealing material? A systematic review and meta-analysis.可流动复合树脂作为窝沟封闭材料?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Br Dent J. 2018 Jan 26;224(2):92-97. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.40.
8
Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth.用于预防恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub5.
9
Randomized Clinical Trial of a Self-Adhering Flowable Composite for Class I Restorations: 2-Year Results.I类洞修复用自粘性可流动复合树脂的随机临床试验:2年结果
Int J Dent. 2017;2017:5041529. doi: 10.1155/2017/5041529. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Marginal Microleakage of Conventional Fissure Sealants and Self-Adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth.传统窝沟封闭剂与自粘结可流动复合树脂作为恒牙窝沟封闭剂的边缘微渗漏情况。
J Dent (Tehran). 2015 Jun;12(6):430-5.