School of Public Health,University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Psychol Health Med. 2022 Jan-Dec;27(sup1):181-192. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2022.2108078. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
Acceptability has become a key consideration in the development, evaluation and implementation of health and social interventions. This commentary paper advances key learnings and recommendations for future intervention acceptability research with young people in Africa, aimed at supporting the achievement of developmental goals. It relates findings of the adolescent acceptability work conducted within the Accelerate Hub, since mid 2020, to broader inter-disciplinary literatures and current regional health and social priorities. We argue that, in order to strengthen the quality and applied value of future acceptability work with young people, we need to do three things better. First, we need to prior findings on acceptability, within and across intervention types, to inform responses to current public health and social challenges and further the conceptual work in this area. Second, we need to better acceptability research with young people, by developing stronger conceptual frameworks that define acceptability and its constructs, and predict its relationship with intervention engagement. Third, we need to better findings by considering acceptability data within a broader social and political context, which in turn can be supported by better conceptualisation. In this paper we describe contributions of our work to each of these three inter-connected objectives, and suggest ways in which they may be taken forward by researchers and practitioners. These include aggregating evidence from past interventions to highlight potential barriers and enablers to current responses in priority areas; involving key actors earlier and more meaningfully in acceptability research; further developing and testing behavioural models for youth acceptability; and working collaboratively across sectors towards programmatic guidance for better contextualisation of acceptability research. Progress in this field will require an inter-disciplinary approach that draws from various literatures such as socio-ecological theory, political economy analysis, health behaviour models and literature on participatory research approaches.
可接受性已成为健康和社会干预措施的制定、评估和实施的关键考虑因素。本文述评针对在非洲开展青少年人群干预措施可接受性研究的关键学习和建议,旨在支持实现发展目标。本文将加速中心在 2020 年年中开展的青少年可接受性工作的发现与更广泛的跨学科文献以及当前区域卫生和社会重点联系起来。我们认为,为了提高未来青少年可接受性工作的质量和应用价值,我们需要在三个方面做得更好。首先,我们需要在干预措施的类型内和跨类型,对可接受性进行优先考量,以应对当前的公共卫生和社会挑战,并推进该领域的概念性工作。其次,我们需要通过制定更强有力的概念框架来更好地理解青少年可接受性研究,该框架可以定义可接受性及其结构,并预测其与干预措施参与的关系。第三,我们需要更好地理解研究发现,将可接受性数据置于更广泛的社会和政治背景下考虑,这反过来又可以通过更好的概念化得到支持。在本文中,我们描述了我们的工作对这三个相互关联的目标的贡献,并提出了研究人员和实践者可以推进这些目标的方法。这些方法包括:汇总过去干预措施的证据,以突出重点领域当前应对措施的潜在障碍和促进因素;让关键行为体更早和更有意义地参与可接受性研究;进一步开发和测试青少年可接受性的行为模型;以及跨部门合作,为更好地将可接受性研究纳入背景提供方案指导。该领域的进展需要采取跨学科方法,从社会生态学理论、政治经济学分析、健康行为模型和参与式研究方法等各种文献中汲取营养。