Suppr超能文献

老年人在 COVID-19 大流行期间的幸福关键:个性、应对方式和意义。

Keys to well-being in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: personality, coping and meaning.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Health, Social Work and Welfare Research, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2022 Dec;17(1):2110669. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2022.2110669.

Abstract

PURPOSE

During the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults were portrayed as an at-risk group. While this may have been true in some respects, empirical studies on mental health, including well-being were conflicting. Some studies found that older adults demonstrated a notable emotional resilience against the impacts of the pandemic. In this study, we qualitatively examine how older adults understand well-being and how they approached pandemic's potential influence on their well-being.

METHODS

17 older adults participated in the study, out of which 14 were interviewed and three provided written responses to a set of questions.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Through Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, three themes emerged:adaptation, control, and a sense of community. We use them to discuss three central questions within well-being theory and research: How far does well-being depend on personal traits and how far does it depend on the environment? How far do people adapt to changed circumstances, and how far is such adaption conducive to maintaining genuine well-being and not just a lowering of standards of comparison? How far does subjective well-being depend on individual and momentary experiences and how far does it depend on the larger temporal and social context of an individual?

摘要

目的

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,老年人被描绘为一个高危群体。虽然从某些方面来看这可能是正确的,但关于心理健康(包括幸福感)的实证研究结果却存在冲突。一些研究发现,老年人表现出了显著的情绪适应能力,能够抵御大流行的影响。在这项研究中,我们从定性的角度探讨了老年人如何理解幸福感,以及他们如何应对大流行对其幸福感可能产生的影响。

方法

17 名老年人参与了这项研究,其中 14 人接受了访谈,3 人对一组问题提供了书面答复。

结果与结论

通过解释性现象学分析,出现了三个主题:适应、控制和社区意识。我们用它们来讨论幸福感理论和研究中的三个核心问题:幸福感在多大程度上取决于个人特质,在多大程度上取决于环境?人们在多大程度上适应了变化的环境,这种适应在多大程度上有利于维持真正的幸福感,而不仅仅是降低了比较标准?主观幸福感在多大程度上取决于个人和瞬间的体验,在多大程度上取决于个人更大的时间和社会背景?

相似文献

10

本文引用的文献

1
Moral Judgement and Moral Progress: The Problem of Cognitive Control.道德判断与道德进步:认知控制问题
Philos Psychol. 2021 Jul 2;34(7):938-961. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2021.1931670. eCollection 2021.
9
Integrating cognitive and emotion paradigms to address the paradox of aging.整合认知和情绪范式,解决老龄化悖论。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Feb;33(1):119-125. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1543181. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
10
Aging: Learning to Live a Finite Life.衰老:学会有限度地生活。
Gerontologist. 2017 Oct 1;57(5):969-976. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw089.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验