• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我利益在审议中的作用:审议资本理论

The Role of Self-Interest in Deliberation: A Theory of Deliberative Capital.

作者信息

Afsahi Afsoun

机构信息

Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Polit Stud (Oxf). 2022 Aug;70(3):701-718. doi: 10.1177/0032321720981491. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1177/0032321720981491
PMID:35941966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9353969/
Abstract

How do successful deliberations unfold? What happens when they unravel? In this article, I propose that we think of the dynamics of participant engagement within deliberation as series of self-interested and reciprocal investments in and divestments from . This article has three parts. First, I draw on the literatures on deliberative democracy and social capital to outline a theory of deliberative capital. I highlight the important role self-interest plays in the process of those initial investments - instances of engagement in positive deliberative behaviours. Second, drawing from my experience as a facilitator, I give an account of the particular indicators of investments and divestments that we might expect to see in a given deliberative engagement. Third, I briefly outline two innovative facilitation techniques that can be utilized at the beginning or during a deliberative process that trigger self-interest, which incentivizes investments and discourages divestments.

摘要

成功的审议是如何展开的?当它们瓦解时会发生什么?在本文中,我提议我们将审议过程中参与者参与的动态视为一系列出于自身利益的相互投入和撤出。本文分为三个部分。首先,我借鉴审议民主和社会资本的文献,概述一种审议资本理论。我强调自身利益在那些初始投入过程中所起的重要作用——即参与积极审议行为的实例。其次,从我作为主持人的经验出发,我阐述了在特定审议活动中我们可能预期会看到的投入和撤出的具体指标。第三,我简要概述两种可在审议过程开始时或期间使用的创新主持技巧,这些技巧能激发自身利益,从而激励投入并抑制撤出。

相似文献

1
The Role of Self-Interest in Deliberation: A Theory of Deliberative Capital.自我利益在审议中的作用:审议资本理论
Polit Stud (Oxf). 2022 Aug;70(3):701-718. doi: 10.1177/0032321720981491. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Assessing Facilitator Fidelity to Principles of Public Deliberation: Tutorial.评估促进者对公众审议原则的忠实度:教程。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 13;7:e51202. doi: 10.2196/51202.
3
Stock options, tax credits or employment contracts please! The value of deliberative public disagreement about human tissue donation.股票期权、税收抵免或就业合同!关于人体组织捐赠的审议性公众分歧的价值。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
4
Regulating Gene Editing in the Wild: Building Regulatory Capacity to Incorporate Deliberative Democracy.规范野外基因编辑:建立监管能力以纳入审议民主。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Nov;51 Suppl 2:S42-S47. doi: 10.1002/hast.1319.
5
Deliberative Democracy and Incompatibilities of Choice Norms.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 29;13(12):985. doi: 10.3390/bs13120985.
6
Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial.公众审议方法在收集医疗保健问题意见方面的有效性:一项随机试验的结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.024. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
7
Community engagement for big epidemiology: deliberative democracy as a tool.社区参与大流行病学:协商民主作为一种工具。
J Pers Med. 2014 Nov 20;4(4):459-74. doi: 10.3390/jpm4040459.
8
Deliberative Public Consultation via Deliberative Polling: Criteria and Methods.协商式民意调查的审议性公共咨询:标准和方法。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Nov;51 Suppl 2:S19-S24. doi: 10.1002/hast.1316.
9
Utilizing deliberative engagement for identifying implementation strategy priorities: lessons learned from an online deliberative forum with dental professionals.利用协商参与确定实施策略优先级:从与牙科专业人员的在线协商论坛中吸取的经验教训。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Sep 21;4(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00496-2.
10
Assessing the quality of deliberative stakeholder consultations involving allied health professionals in pediatric palliative care and hematology/oncology in Canada.评估加拿大儿科姑息治疗和血液学/肿瘤学中涉及辅助卫生专业人员的决策利益相关者咨询的质量。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Dec 15;20(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00884-2.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the Point of Social Media? Corporate Purpose and Digital Democratization.社交媒体的意义何在?企业宗旨与数字民主化。
Philos Technol. 2025;38(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s13347-025-00855-y. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Procedural fairness and the resilience of health financing reforms in Ukraine.程序公平与乌克兰卫生筹资改革的韧性
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i59-i72. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad062.
3
Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review.卫生筹资决策程序公正性标准:范围综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i13-i35. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad066.
4
Procedural fairness in health financing for universal health coverage: why, what and how.全民健康覆盖卫生筹资中的程序公平:为何、是什么以及如何实现。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i1-i4. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad069.

本文引用的文献

1
The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation.民主危机与审议科学。
Science. 2019 Mar 15;363(6432):1144-1146. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2694.
2
The dark side of social capital: A systematic review of the negative health effects of social capital.社会资本的阴暗面:社会资本对健康的负面影响的系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;194:105-127. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
3
Third-party punishment as a costly signal of high continuation probabilities in repeated games.第三方惩罚作为重复博弈中高延续概率的一种代价高昂的信号。
J Theor Biol. 2017 May 21;421:189-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Perspective-taking increases willingness to engage in intergroup contact.换位思考会增加参与群体间接触的意愿。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085681. eCollection 2014.
5
Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails.带有代价高昂惩罚的直接互惠:慷慨的以牙还牙策略占上风。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Jan 7;256(1):45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.015. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
6
Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: the differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations.为何深入对手的思维会带来回报:换位思考与同理心在谈判中的不同影响。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):378-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02096.x.
7
Repeated games and direct reciprocity under active linking.主动链接下的重复博弈与直接互惠
J Theor Biol. 2008 Feb 21;250(4):723-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.10.040. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
8
On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.关于面子工程:社会互动中仪式元素的分析
Psychiatry. 1955 Aug;18(3):213-31. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008.
9
Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.换位思考:减少刻板印象表达、刻板印象易接近性和内群体偏袒。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Apr;78(4):708-24. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.708.