• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三种第七代粘结剂评估树脂基复合材料与生物陶瓷的剪切粘结强度:一项研究。

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Based Composites to Biodentine with Three Types of Seventh-Generation Bonding Agents: An Study.

作者信息

Abdullah Huda Abbas, Al-Ibraheemi Zahraa Abdulaali, Hanoon Zanbaq Azeez, Haider Julfikar

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq.

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2022 Jul 30;2022:2830299. doi: 10.1155/2022/2830299. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/2830299
PMID:35942229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9356874/
Abstract

METHODS

Forty-eight acrylic blocks having central holes with a nominal diameter of 4 mm and a depth of 2 mm were prepared. The holes of the acrylic blocks were filled with Biodentine, which was prepared following the guidelines provided by the manufacturer. Then, the specimens were divided into six groups ( = 8). Groups 1, 2, and 3, Tetric N-Ceram composite bonded to Biodentine with Tetric N-bond, Xeno V+, Bond Force bond, respectively. Group 4, 5, and 6, Filtek Z350 bonded to Biodentine with the same three adhesives. The specimens were placed in distilled water for 24 hours and tested for the SBS in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The test data were listed in a table and independent samples -test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted as a part of the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The Tetric N bonding agent achieved the highest SBS followed by Bond Force, and Xeno V and highly significant difference was found. On the other hand, an overall increase in the SBS values of the Tetric N-Ceram resin was noticed in comparison with the Filtek Z350 and the differences was statistically significant. Although the specimens failed in adhesive, cohesive and mixed fracture modes but the cohesive was found to be the dominant failure mode in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Among the tested bonding agents and resin composites, the Tetric N-Ceram composite bonded by Tetric N-bond self-etch adhesive with the Biodentine showed the highest SBS compared to the other combinations.

摘要

方法

制备48个具有标称直径为4毫米、深度为2毫米的中心孔的丙烯酸块。丙烯酸块的孔用生物活性玻璃陶瓷(Biodentine)填充,其制备遵循制造商提供的指南。然后,将标本分为六组(每组 = 8)。第1、2和3组,分别用Tetric N-bond、Xeno V+、Bond Force粘结剂将Tetric N-Ceram复合材料粘结到生物活性玻璃陶瓷上。第4、5和6组,用相同的三种粘结剂将Filtek Z350粘结到生物活性玻璃陶瓷上。将标本置于蒸馏水中24小时,并在万能试验机上以1毫米/分钟的十字头速度测试剪切粘结强度(SBS)。测试数据列于表格中,并进行独立样本t检验和方差分析(ANOVA)作为统计分析的一部分。

结果

Tetric N粘结剂的SBS最高,其次是Bond Force,Xeno V的SBS最低,且差异具有高度显著性。另一方面,与Filtek Z350相比,Tetric N-Ceram树脂的SBS值总体有所增加,且差异具有统计学意义。尽管标本在粘结、内聚和混合断裂模式下失效,但内聚是所有组中的主要失效模式。

结论

在测试的粘结剂和树脂复合材料中,与其他组合相比,用Tetric N-bond自酸蚀粘结剂粘结生物活性玻璃陶瓷的Tetric N-Ceram复合材料显示出最高的SBS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/3743bd7e9327/IJD2022-2830299.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/2e9d6912553f/IJD2022-2830299.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/1bf8acc2c471/IJD2022-2830299.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/e51da9eefa75/IJD2022-2830299.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/ffffea709ff8/IJD2022-2830299.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/8bbb777194a2/IJD2022-2830299.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/be197c3719df/IJD2022-2830299.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/3743bd7e9327/IJD2022-2830299.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/2e9d6912553f/IJD2022-2830299.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/1bf8acc2c471/IJD2022-2830299.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/e51da9eefa75/IJD2022-2830299.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/ffffea709ff8/IJD2022-2830299.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/8bbb777194a2/IJD2022-2830299.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/be197c3719df/IJD2022-2830299.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8f9/9356874/3743bd7e9327/IJD2022-2830299.007.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Based Composites to Biodentine with Three Types of Seventh-Generation Bonding Agents: An Study.使用三种第七代粘结剂评估树脂基复合材料与生物陶瓷的剪切粘结强度:一项研究。
Int J Dent. 2022 Jul 30;2022:2830299. doi: 10.1155/2022/2830299. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparative evaluations of shear bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and calcium-enriched mixture to bulk-fill flowable composite using three different adhesive systems: An study.使用三种不同粘结系统对三氧化矿物凝聚体、生物陶瓷和富钙混合物与大块可流动复合树脂之间的剪切粘结强度进行的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jul;27(7):706-713. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_192_24. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Effect of Remineralizing Agents on Bond Strength of Resin-Composites to Primary Enamel.再矿化剂对树脂复合材料与乳牙釉质粘结强度的影响。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;43(5):331-336. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-43.5.5.
4
Effects of the Contents of Various Solvents in One-step Self-etch Adhesives on Shear Bond Strengths to Enamel and Dentin.一步法自酸蚀粘接剂中各种溶剂含量对牙釉质和牙本质剪切粘接强度的影响
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):1260-1268.
5
Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.树脂复合材料与近期高粘度玻璃离子水门汀之间的抗剪粘结强度和界面分析,以及各种粘结系统的粘结效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jun;23(6):2599-2608. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2678-5. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
6
Shear Bond Strength of E. Max Ceramic Restoration to Hydraulic Calcium Silicate Based Cement (Biodentine): An In Vitro Study.电动陶瓷修复体与水门汀基水泥(Biodentine)黏结强度的体外研究。
Eur Endod J. 2020 Dec;5(3):288-294. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.75046.
7
Shear Bond Strength of a Resin Composite to Six Pulp Capping Materials Used in Primary Teeth.树脂复合材料与六种用于乳牙的盖髓材料的剪切粘结强度。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Aug 1;44(4):234-239. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.4.4.
8
Shear Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Evaluated by Different Adhesion Protocols.通过不同粘结方案评估大块充填复合材料与树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的剪切粘结强度。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 Sep 16;12:367-375. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S273842. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Tricalcium Silicate-based Materials to Composite Resin with Two Different Adhesive Systems: An Study.基于硅酸三钙的材料与两种不同粘结系统的复合树脂之间剪切粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov;16(Suppl 3):272-277. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2687.
10
In vitro evaluation of the bond strength of composite resin foundation materials to dentin.复合树脂基础材料与牙本质粘结强度的体外评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Oct;114(4):529-35. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Suitability of Direct Resin Composites in Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth (ETT).直接树脂复合材料用于修复根管治疗后牙齿(ETT)的适用性。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 26;17(15):3707. doi: 10.3390/ma17153707.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Commercially Available Esthetic Restorative Composite Materials: An Study.三种市售美学修复复合材料的剪切粘结强度比较:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;13(6):635-639. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1849.
2
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of sixth- and seventh-generation bonding agents with varying pH - An study.不同pH值的第六代和第七代粘结剂剪切粘结强度的比较评估——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Mar-Apr;23(2):169-173. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_543_19. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Comparative evaluation of the bond strength of self-adhering and bulk-fill flowable composites to MTA Plus, Dycal, Biodentine, and TheraCal: an study.
自粘结和大体积可流动复合树脂与MTA Plus、Dycal、Biodentine和TheraCal粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Jan 8;45(1):e10. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e10. eCollection 2020 Feb.
4
Bond strength of Biodentine to a resin-based composite at various acid etching times and with different adhesive strategies.在不同酸蚀时间及采用不同粘结策略的情况下,生物陶瓷与树脂基复合材料的粘结强度。
Dent Med Probl. 2019 Jan-Mar;56(1):39-44. doi: 10.17219/dmp/103589.
5
Bonding of Composite to Base Materials: Effects of Adhesive Treatments on Base Surface Properties and Bond Strength.复合材料与基底材料的黏合:黏合处理对基底表面性能和黏合强度的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):151-164. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a40302.
6
Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine.不同修复材料与三氧化矿物凝聚体和生物陶瓷的剪切粘结强度。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;20(5):292-296. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_97_17.
7
Effect of saliva and blood contamination on the shear bond strength of fifth-, seventh-, and eighth-generation bonding agents: An study.唾液和血液污染对第五代、第七代和第八代粘结剂剪切粘结强度的影响:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 May-Jun;20(3):157-160. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.218310.
8
Effect of Dentin Wetness on the Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives.牙本质湿润度对通用型粘结剂粘结强度的影响
Materials (Basel). 2017 Oct 25;10(11):1224. doi: 10.3390/ma10111224.
9
MTA versus Biodentine: Review of Literature with a Comparative Analysis.MTA与生物陶瓷:文献综述及比较分析
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):ZG01-ZG05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25840.10374. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
10
Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type.牙科粘结系统的分类综述:从第四代到通用型
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Jul 3;8(1):1-17. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.