• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BRIX 3000 与微创修复治疗在乳磨牙龋齿治疗中的疗效评价:一项临床对比研究。

Evaluation of Caries Removal Efficacy Using BRIX 3000 and Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in Primary Molars: A Clinical Comparative Study.

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Siddhartha Dental College and Hospital, Sri Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Tumkur, Karnataka, India, Phone: +91 7979888281, e-mail:

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Siddhartha Dental College and Hospital, Sri Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Tumkur, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):419-424.

PMID:35945835
Abstract

AIM

The aim of the present study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of two minimally invasive methods in the removal of infected carious dentin in primary molars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty primary molars with class I occlusal caries involving dentin were selected and allocated to either of the two groups using convenient sampling. Group A ( = 40) caries were excavated using BRIX 3000 and in Group B ( = 40) atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) caries were excavated using hand instruments only. In both groups, caries removal efficacy was evaluated clinically using caries detection dye (Sable and Sleek), and the patient's discomfort level was noted using the Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (WBFPS).

RESULTS

The results indicated that BRIX 3000 was effective in the removal of caries from primary molars with a significant difference. While there was no statistically significant difference seen in pain perception on caries excavation using both the methods. Although, a mild discomfort was noted in Group B.

CONCLUSION

Comparing the two minimally invasive techniques, the new chemomechanical solution (BRIX 3000) was an effective method for the removal of caries from primary molars. So, it can be considered an alternative to the conventional caries removal method in treating pediatric dental patients.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

BRIX 3000 gel is effective in the removal of caries in children who are anxious and apprehensive as it is a noninvasive method of treatment in the pediatric age group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较和评估两种微创方法在去除儿童乳磨牙感染性龋坏牙本质中的疗效。

材料和方法

采用便利抽样法选取 80 颗涉及牙本质的 I 类窝沟龋的乳磨牙,并将其分配到两组。组 A(n = 40)使用 BRIX 3000 进行龋蚀去除,组 B(n = 40)使用手动器械进行无创伤性修复治疗(ART)龋蚀去除。两组均采用龋蚀检测染料(Sable 和 Sleek)进行临床龋蚀去除效果评估,并采用 Wong-Baker 面部疼痛评定量表(WBFPS)记录患者的不适程度。

结果

结果表明,BRIX 3000 去除乳磨牙龋坏牙本质的效果显著,差异有统计学意义。两种方法在龋蚀去除过程中的疼痛感知方面无统计学差异,但组 B 有轻度不适。

结论

比较两种微创技术,新型化学机械解决方案(BRIX 3000)是去除乳磨牙龋坏牙本质的有效方法。因此,在治疗儿童牙科患者时,它可以作为传统龋蚀去除方法的替代方法。

临床意义

BRIX 3000 凝胶对焦虑和恐惧的儿童是一种有效的治疗方法,因为它是一种在儿科年龄段的非侵入性治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Caries Removal Efficacy Using BRIX 3000 and Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in Primary Molars: A Clinical Comparative Study.BRIX 3000 与微创修复治疗在乳磨牙龋齿治疗中的疗效评价:一项临床对比研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):419-424.
2
Pain perception of children after restorative treatments: Atraumatic restorative treatment versus chemomechanical removal - A noninferiority randomized clinical trial.儿童修复治疗后的疼痛感知:微创修复治疗与化学机械法去腐的效果比较——一项非劣效性随机临床试验。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2021 Apr-Jun;39(2):202-207. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_426_20.
3
Comparing the efficacies of two chemo-mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and brix 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: A randomized controlled clinical trial.比较两种化学机械去龋剂(2.25%次氯酸钠凝胶和 brix3000)在去龋和患者合作方面的疗效:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Dent. 2020 Feb;93:103280. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103280. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
Examination of caries-affected dentin and composite-resin interface after different caries removal methods: A scanning electron microscope study.不同龋病去除方法后龋病受累牙本质与复合树脂界面的检查:扫描电子显微镜研究。
Microsc Res Tech. 2022 Jun;85(6):2212-2221. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24078. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
5
Evaluation of silver-modified atraumatic restorative technique versus conventional pulp therapy in asymptomatic deep carious lesion of primary molars - A comparative prospective clinical study.评价银改性微创修复技术与常规牙髓疗法治疗原发性磨牙无症状深龋的疗效:一项前瞻性临床对比研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022 Oct-Dec;40(4):383-390. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_360_22.
6
The effectiveness of Carie-Care™, chemomechanical caries removal technique in primary teeth: randomized controlled clinical trial.Carie-Care™ 在乳牙龋齿治疗中的效果:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 18;23(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03594-8.
7
Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: A clinical and microbiological assessment - An study.使用聚合物车针与化学机械去龋剂去除龋坏组织的疗效比较:一项临床和微生物学评估——一项研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;35(1):6-13. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.199232.
8
[Effects of three caries removal methods on children's dental fear evaluated by physiological measure].[通过生理测量评估三种龋齿去除方法对儿童牙科恐惧的影响]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2007 Apr;16(2):149-52.
9
Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.乳牙三种龋病去除方法的临床评估:一项随机对照试验
Community Dent Health. 2012 Jun;29(2):173-8.
10
Volumetric analysis after caries excavation with caries detecting dyes and chemomechanical caries removal agents using 3D scanner-a randomised clinical trial.使用 3D 扫描仪评估龋病探测染料和化学机械去龋剂去腐后的容积变化:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 1;24(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03907-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemomechanical Caries Removal with Enzymatic Technology: A Comparative Study.酶技术用于化学机械性龋病去除的比较研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025 Mar;18(3):245-250. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3067. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
2
Comparative study for assessment of two different minimally invasive caries removal techniques.两种不同微创龋病去除技术评估的对比研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05537-x.
3
Comparing efficacies of various papain-based enzyme agents and 2.4% sodium hypochlorite gel in chemomechanical caries removal: a randomized controlled trial.
比较各种基于木瓜蛋白酶的酶制剂与2.4%次氯酸钠凝胶在化学机械去龋中的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
BDJ Open. 2024 Sep 4;10(1):70. doi: 10.1038/s41405-024-00258-9.
4
Ozone Treatment for the Management of Caries in Primary Dentition: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.臭氧治疗在乳牙龋病管理中的应用:临床研究的系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Mar 6;12(3):69. doi: 10.3390/dj12030069.