• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安全还是服务?员工亲社会违规行为对消费者满意度的影响。

Safety or service? Effects of employee prosocial safety-rule-breaking on consumer satisfaction.

作者信息

Shum Cass, Ghosh Ankita

机构信息

William F. Harrah College of Hospitality, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Parkway Box 456013, Las Vegas, NV 89154-6021, USA.

出版信息

Int J Hosp Manag. 2022 May;103:103225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103225. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103225
PMID:35946038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9352442/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic makes restaurants implement new safety rules. However, because of consumers' and employees' resistance, employees may break these rules to improve the service experience. This paper examines how employees' prosocial safety-rule-breakings (PSRB) affect consumer satisfaction. We propose that PSRB has two competing effects on consumers' (including both requesters and bystanders) satisfaction via the mediating roles of service performance and perceived safety. We tested our proposed model in two experiments, adopting a 2 (Consumer role: Requesters vs. Bystanders) × 2 (PSRB level: Low vs. High) between-subject experimental design. Our findings suggest that PSRB has a strong negative relationship with bystanders' service performance rating. PSRB harms both requesters' and bystanders' perceived safety. PSRB reduces consumer satisfaction, and the relationship is stronger for bystanders (vs. requesters). This study demonstrates the importance for hospitality organizations to ensure safety rule compliance during and after the pandemic.

摘要

新冠疫情使得餐厅实施新的安全规定。然而,由于消费者和员工的抵触情绪,员工可能会违反这些规定以提升服务体验。本文探讨员工的亲社会型安全违规行为(PSRB)如何影响消费者满意度。我们提出,PSRB通过服务表现和感知安全的中介作用,对消费者(包括请求者和旁观者)的满意度产生两种相互竞争的影响。我们在两个实验中测试了我们提出的模型,采用2(消费者角色:请求者与旁观者)×2(PSRB水平:低与高)组间实验设计。我们的研究结果表明,PSRB与旁观者的服务表现评分呈强烈负相关。PSRB损害了请求者和旁观者的感知安全。PSRB降低了消费者满意度,且这种关系在旁观者(相对于请求者)中更强。本研究表明,酒店企业在疫情期间及之后确保安全规定的遵守非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5de4/9352442/b821b80aa8ca/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5de4/9352442/b821b80aa8ca/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5de4/9352442/b821b80aa8ca/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety or service? Effects of employee prosocial safety-rule-breaking on consumer satisfaction.安全还是服务?员工亲社会违规行为对消费者满意度的影响。
Int J Hosp Manag. 2022 May;103:103225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103225. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Servant Leadership and Followers Prosocial Rule-Breaking: The Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation.仆人式领导与追随者的亲社会违规行为:公共服务动机的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 5;13:848531. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848531. eCollection 2022.
3
Does Self-Sacrifice Make Me Great? Research on the Relationship Between Employee Conscientiousness and Pro-Social Rule Breaking.自我牺牲能让我变得伟大吗?关于员工尽责性与亲社会违规行为之间关系的研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 30;13:834274. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834274. eCollection 2022.
4
Inclusive Leadership and Subordinates' Pro-Social Rule Breaking in the Workplace: Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy and Moderating Role of Employee Relations Climate.包容性领导与下属在工作场所的亲社会违规行为:自我效能感的中介作用和员工关系氛围的调节作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Oct 11;14:1691-1706. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S333593. eCollection 2021.
5
Investigating Inclusive Leadership and Pro-Social Rule Breaking in Hospitality Industry: Important Role of Psychological Safety and Leadership Identification.调查酒店业包容性领导与亲社会违规行为:心理安全和领导认同的重要作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;19(14):8291. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148291.
6
The Trickle-Down Effect of Leaders' Pro-social Rule Breaking: Joint Moderating Role of Empowering Leadership and Courage.领导者亲社会违规行为的涓滴效应:赋能型领导与勇气的联合调节作用
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 7;9:2647. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02647. eCollection 2018.
7
Role Stress and Prosocial Service Behavior of Hotel Employees: A Moderated Mediation Model of Job Satisfaction and Social Support.酒店员工的角色压力与亲社会服务行为:工作满意度和社会支持的有调节中介模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:698027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.698027. eCollection 2021.
8
Immune moral models? Pro-social rule breaking as a moral enhancement approach for ethical AI.免疫道德模型?将打破亲社会规则作为道德增强方法应用于符合伦理的人工智能。
AI Soc. 2023;38(2):801-813. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01478-z. Epub 2022 May 23.
9
Inclusive Leadership and Pro-Social Rule Breaking: The Role of Psychological Safety, Leadership Identification and Leader-Member Exchange.包容性领导与亲社会的违规行为:心理安全、领导认同和领导-成员交换的作用。
Psychol Rep. 2021 Oct;124(5):2155-2179. doi: 10.1177/0033294120953558. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
10
COVID-19 Safety Measures in the Food Service Sector: Consumers' Attitudes and Transparency Perceptions at Three Different Stages of the Pandemic.食品服务行业的新冠疫情安全措施:疫情三个不同阶段消费者的态度及透明度认知
Foods. 2022 Mar 11;11(6):810. doi: 10.3390/foods11060810.

引用本文的文献

1
Team pro-social rule breaking and team innovation performance: An information processing theory perspective.团队亲社会违规与团队创新绩效:信息加工理论视角
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0303800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303800. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Restaurant preventive behaviors and the role of media during a pandemic.餐厅预防行为与疫情期间媒体的作用。
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102906. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
2
To dine or not to dine? Collective wellbeing in hospitality in the COVID-19 era.就餐与否?新冠疫情时代酒店业的集体福祉。
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102892. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102892. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
3
Factors influencing customers' dine out intention during COVID-19 reopening period: The moderating role of country-of-origin effect.
新冠疫情解封期间影响顾客外出就餐意愿的因素:原产国效应的调节作用
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102894. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102894. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Descriptive or injunctive: How do restaurant customers react to the guidelines of COVID-19 prevention measures? The role of psychological reactance.描述性还是指令性:餐厅顾客如何应对新冠疫情防控措施指南?心理抗拒的作用。
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102934. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102934. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
5
The effects of crowdedness and safety measures on restaurant patronage choices and perceptions in the COVID-19 pandemic.拥挤程度和安全措施对新冠疫情期间餐厅光顾选择及认知的影响
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102910. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102910. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
6
Dealing with pandemics: An investigation of the effects of COVID-19 on customers' evaluations of hospitality services.应对大流行病:关于新冠疫情对顾客对酒店服务评价影响的调查
Tour Manag. 2021 Aug;85:104320. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104320. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
7
The public perception of food and non-food related risks of infection and trust in the risk communication during COVID-19 crisis: A study on selected countries from the Arab region.新冠疫情危机期间公众对食品及非食品相关感染风险的认知以及对风险沟通的信任:对阿拉伯地区部分国家的研究
Food Control. 2021 Mar;121:107617. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107617. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
8
Uncertainty risks and strategic reaction of restaurant firms amid COVID-19: Evidence from China.新冠疫情下餐饮企业的不确定性风险与战略反应:来自中国的证据
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102752. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102752. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
9
The future of the chef occupation and the food and beverage sector after the COVID-19 outbreak: Opinions of Turkish chefs.新冠疫情爆发后厨师职业及餐饮行业的未来:土耳其厨师的观点
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102682. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102682. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
10
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the U.S. restaurant industry.新冠疫情的影响:来自美国餐饮行业的证据。
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102702. Epub 2020 Oct 1.