Georgia Baptist College of Nursing, Mercer University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA.
Clin Obes. 2022 Dec;12(6):e12545. doi: 10.1111/cob.12545. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Weight bias is prevalent in many healthcare disciplines and negatively impacts the quality of care for patients with obesity. This warrants interventions to reduce weight bias shown by providers to improve care for individuals with obesity. However, past reviews have identified only marginal success in improving the attitudes and beliefs of healthcare providers about individuals with obesity. This systematic review and meta-analysis identifies and synthesizes recent peer-reviewed intervention studies aimed at reducing weight bias in healthcare students and professionals. The databases Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsychINFO, PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between 2016 and August 2021. Search terms included a combination of surrogate terms for the concepts of weight bias, intervention and healthcare students or professionals. The search yielded 1136 articles, and 14 articles met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Nineteen effect sizes from nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the interventions in the included studies result in a 0.38 SD reduction (Hedge's g) in obesity-bias with 95% confidence intervals from -0.52 to -0.24, indicating a small to moderate effect size in the reduction of weight bias. Most studies included students and focused on evoking empathy or educating on the causality/controllability of obesity. Measurement tools, intervention type, limitations of the studies and recommendations for future research are discussed.
体重偏见在许多医疗保健学科中普遍存在,对肥胖患者的护理质量产生负面影响。这需要采取干预措施,减少提供者对肥胖患者的体重偏见,以改善对肥胖患者的护理。然而,过去的综述仅发现改善医疗保健提供者对肥胖个体的态度和信念方面取得了微小的成功。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定并综合最近的同行评审干预研究,以减少医疗保健学生和专业人员的体重偏见。在 2016 年至 2021 年 8 月期间,检索了 Embase、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、PsychINFO、PubMed 和 Google Scholar 等数据库,以查找同行评审的研究。检索词包括体重偏见、干预和医疗保健学生或专业人员等概念的替代术语的组合。搜索结果产生了 1136 篇文章,其中 14 篇文章符合系统评价的纳入标准。共有 9 项研究的 19 个效应量被纳入荟萃分析。总体而言,纳入研究中的干预措施导致肥胖偏见减少了 0.38 个标准差(Hedge's g),95%置信区间为-0.52 至-0.24,表明体重偏见减少的效果大小为小到中等。大多数研究都包括学生,并侧重于唤起同理心或教育肥胖的因果关系/可控性。讨论了测量工具、干预类型、研究的局限性以及对未来研究的建议。