• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普通公众对新型抗肥胖药物的看法以及对肥胖是意志力薄弱表现的认知。

Views Among the General Public on New Anti-Obesity Medications and on the Perception of Obesity as a Failure of Willpower.

作者信息

Goldkorn Maya, Schwartz Barry, Monterosso John

机构信息

The College University of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.

Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley Berkeley California USA.

出版信息

Obes Sci Pract. 2025 Apr 22;11(2):e70041. doi: 10.1002/osp4.70041. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/osp4.70041
PMID:40264658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12012989/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The experience of obesity stigma is associated with negative clinical outcomes that include increased mental health problems and additional weight gain. Researchers have treated the public view that obesity is caused by poor willpower as both an of obesity stigma and as a of obesity stigma. Here we test the hypothesis that awareness of new and effective glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist anti-obesity medications (AOMs) will encourage the view that obesity is a biologically-determined medical condition rather than a personal willpower failure and thereby lessen obesity stigma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two questionnaire studies, in which participants were randomly assigned to either read about the success of AOMs or to read various alternative material ( = 640 in total), investigated the effect that AOM awareness has on views of obesity.

RESULTS

Contrary to the study hypotheses, reading about AOMs did not increase the degree to which participants viewed obesity as a medical condition, nor did it reduce the role willpower failure was believed to play in obesity. Across conditions, participants reporting more personal success in weight loss without medication indicated greater belief that obesity was amenable to self-control, expressed greater obesity stigma, and held less positive attitudes toward the use of AOMs to manage weight.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, these two studies provide no evidence that the success of AOMs will, in the short-term, lead to changes in how people view the etiology of obesity or to a reduction in obesity stigma. Correlational data suggest the possibility that blame and stigma associated with obesity may be robustly informed by participants' understanding of their own experiences managing weight.

摘要

背景

肥胖污名化的经历与负面临床结果相关,包括心理健康问题增加和体重进一步增加。研究人员将公众认为肥胖是由意志力薄弱导致的观点,既视为肥胖污名化的一个来源,也视为肥胖污名化的一个后果。在此,我们检验这样一个假设,即了解新型有效的胰高血糖素样肽受体激动剂抗肥胖药物(AOMs)将促使人们认为肥胖是一种由生物学因素决定的医学状况,而非个人意志力的失败,从而减轻肥胖污名。

材料与方法

两项问卷调查研究,参与者被随机分配阅读有关AOMs成功案例的内容或阅读各种其他材料(总共640人),调查了对AOMs的了解对肥胖观念的影响。

结果

与研究假设相反,阅读有关AOMs的内容并未增加参与者将肥胖视为医学状况的程度,也未减少人们认为意志力失败在肥胖中所起的作用。在所有条件下,报告在未使用药物的情况下个人减肥更成功的参与者,更坚信肥胖可以通过自我控制解决,表现出更强的肥胖污名化,并且对使用AOMs来控制体重的态度也更不积极。

结论

综合来看,这两项研究没有提供证据表明AOMs的成功在短期内会导致人们对肥胖病因看法的改变或肥胖污名化的减轻。相关数据表明,与肥胖相关的指责和污名化可能很大程度上受到参与者对自身体重管理经历的理解的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dab/12012989/3e5eb6d12411/OSP4-11-e70041-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dab/12012989/3e5eb6d12411/OSP4-11-e70041-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dab/12012989/3e5eb6d12411/OSP4-11-e70041-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Views Among the General Public on New Anti-Obesity Medications and on the Perception of Obesity as a Failure of Willpower.普通公众对新型抗肥胖药物的看法以及对肥胖是意志力薄弱表现的认知。
Obes Sci Pract. 2025 Apr 22;11(2):e70041. doi: 10.1002/osp4.70041. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Examining how framing obesity as disease vs. food addiction influences stigma among fitness practitioners.探讨将肥胖定义为疾病与食物成瘾对健身从业者的污名化影响。
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Sep-Oct;16(5):429-433. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
3
Weight Loss and Maintenance Related to the Mechanism of Action of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists.GLP-1 受体激动剂作用机制与体重减轻和维持的关系。
Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):2821-2839. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01710-0. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
Healthcare professionals' perceptions and management of obesity & knowledge of glucagon, GLP-1, GIP receptor agonists, and dual agonists.医疗保健专业人员对肥胖症的认知与管理以及对胰高血糖素、胰高血糖素样肽-1、葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽受体激动剂和双重激动剂的了解。
Obes Sci Pract. 2024 May 4;10(3):e756. doi: 10.1002/osp4.756. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Economic outcomes of antiobesity medication use among adults in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.美国成年人使用抗肥胖药物的经济结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Oct;28(10):1066-1079. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22116. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
6
Knowledge and Perception of Anti-obesity Medications Among Primary Healthcare Center Visitors in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in 2024: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.2024年沙特阿拉伯吉达初级医疗中心就诊者对减肥药的认知与看法:一项分析性横断面研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 30;16(8):e68240. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68240. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Real-world evidence on the utilization, clinical and comparative effectiveness, and adverse effects of newer GLP-1RA-based weight-loss therapies.关于新型基于胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)的减肥疗法的使用、临床及对比疗效和不良反应的真实世界证据。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Apr;27 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):66-88. doi: 10.1111/dom.16364. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
8
The Impact of Novel Medications for Obesity on Weight Stigma and Societal Attitudes: A Narrative Review.新型肥胖药物对体重歧视和社会态度的影响:一项叙述性综述。
Curr Obes Rep. 2025 Feb 5;14(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s13679-025-00611-5.
9
Attitudes, weight stigma and misperceptions of weight loss strategies among patients living with obesity in the Lazio Region, Italy.意大利拉齐奥地区肥胖患者对减肥策略的态度、体重污名化和误解。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 15;15:1434360. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1434360. eCollection 2024.
10
Adverse event comparison between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and other antiobesity medications following bariatric surgery.减重手术后胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与其他减肥药的不良事件比较。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Sep;26(9):3906-3913. doi: 10.1111/dom.15737. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of GLP-1 receptor agonist use on negative evaluations of women with higher and lower body weight.GLP-1 受体激动剂使用对体重较高和较低的女性的负面评价的影响。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Jul;48(7):1019-1026. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01516-4. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
2
Obesity and psychological distress.肥胖与心理困扰。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Oct 23;378(1888):20220225. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0225. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
3
Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA.
在线人体研究中的数据质量:MTurk、ProLific、CloudResearch、Qualtrics 和 SONA 之间的比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 14;18(3):e0279720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279720. eCollection 2023.
4
Distinct factors associated with short-term and long-term weight loss induced by low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet intervention.低脂或低碳水化合物饮食干预诱导的短期和长期体重减轻相关的不同因素。
Cell Rep Med. 2022 Dec 20;3(12):100870. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100870. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
5
A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Effectiveness of Narrative vs. Statistical Evidence: Health vs. Non-Health Contexts.一项比较叙事性证据与统计性证据有效性的元分析:健康情境与非健康情境
Health Commun. 2023 Dec;38(14):3113-3123. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2137750. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
6
Interventions for reducing weight bias in healthcare providers: An interprofessional systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施以减少医疗保健提供者的体重偏见:一项跨专业的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Obes. 2022 Dec;12(6):e12545. doi: 10.1111/cob.12545. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
7
Effective strategies in ending weight stigma in healthcare.有效策略终结医疗保健中的体重歧视。
Obes Rev. 2022 Oct;23(10):e13494. doi: 10.1111/obr.13494. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
8
Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity.每周一次司美格鲁肽在超重或肥胖成人中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 18;384(11):989-1002. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032183. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Influence of Body Mass Index and Gender on Stigmatization of Obesity.体质指数和性别对肥胖歧视的影响。
Obes Surg. 2020 Dec;30(12):4926-4934. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04895-5. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
10
Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity.体重歧视是导致肥胖的一种社会心理因素。
Am Psychol. 2020 Feb-Mar;75(2):274-289. doi: 10.1037/amp0000538.