IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2023 Dec;29(12):4990-5007. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3197810. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
This article presents the results from a Spatial Augmented Reality (SAR) study which evaluated the cognitive cost of several predictive cues. Participants performed a validated procedural button pressing task, where the predictive cue annotations guided them to the upcoming task. While existing research has evaluated predictive cues based on their performance and self-rated mental effort, actual cognitive cost has yet to be investigated. To measure the user's brain activity, this study utilized electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. Cognitive load was evaluated by measuring brain responses for a secondary auditory oddball task, with reduced brain responses to oddball tones expected when cognitive load in the primary task is highest. A simple monitor n-back task and procedural task comparing monitor versus SAR were conducted, followed by a version of the procedural task comparing the SAR predictive cues. Results from the brain responses were able to distinguish between performance enhancing cues with a high and low cognitive load. Electrical brain responses also revealed that having an arc or arrow guide towards the upcoming task required the least amount of mental effort.
本文呈现了一项空间增强现实 (SAR) 研究的结果,该研究评估了几种预测线索的认知成本。参与者执行了一项经过验证的程序性按钮按压任务,其中预测线索注释引导他们完成即将到来的任务。虽然现有研究已经根据预测线索的性能和自我评估的心理努力来评估预测线索,但尚未研究实际的认知成本。为了测量用户的大脑活动,本研究使用了脑电图 (EEG) 记录。通过测量次要听觉异常任务的大脑反应来评估认知负荷,当主要任务中的认知负荷最高时,预计对异常音的大脑反应会降低。进行了简单的监视器 n-back 任务和监视器与 SAR 的程序任务比较,然后进行了比较 SAR 预测线索的程序任务版本。大脑反应的结果能够区分具有高认知负荷和低认知负荷的增强性能线索。电脑反应还表明,有一个弧形或箭头指向即将到来的任务需要的心理努力最小。