Suppr超能文献

作者性别和研究领域的研究生产力趋势:一项多学科和多国观察性研究。

Trends of research productivity across author gender and research fields: A multidisciplinary and multi-country observational study.

机构信息

Research Centre for Integrated Transport Innovation (rCITI), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of New South Wales, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

School of Engineering and Information Technology (SEIT), UNSW, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 10;17(8):e0271998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271998. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Bibliographic properties of more than 75 million scholarly articles, are examined and trends in overall research productivity are analysed as a function of research field (over the period of 1970-2020) and author gender (over the period of 2006-2020). Potential disruptive effects of the Covid-19 pandemic are also investigated. Over the last decade (2010-2020), the annual number of publications have invariably increased every year with the largest relative increase in a single year happening in 2019 (more than 6% relative growth). But this momentum was interrupted in 2020. Trends show that Environmental Sciences and Engineering Environmental have been the fastest growing research fields. The disruption in patterns of scholarly publication due to the Covid-19 pandemic was unevenly distributed across fields, with Computer Science, Engineering and Social Science enduring the most notable declines. The overall trends of male and female productivity indicate that, in terms of absolute number of publications, the gender gap does not seem to be closing in any country. The trends in absolute gap between male and female authors is either parallel (e.g., Canada, Australia, England, USA) or widening (e.g., majority of countries, particularly Middle Eastern countries). In terms of the ratio of female to male productivity, however, the gap is narrowing almost invariably, though at markedly different rates across countries. While some countries are nearing a ratio of .7 and are well on track for a 0.9 female to male productivity ratio, our estimates show that certain countries (particularly across the Middle East) will not reach such targets within the next 100 years. Without interventional policies, a significant gap will continue to exist in such countries. The decrease or increase in research productivity during the first year of the pandemic, in contrast to trends established before 2020, was generally parallel for male and female authors. There has been no substantial gender difference in the disruption due to the pandemic. However, opposite trends were found in a few cases. It was observed that, in some countries (e.g., The Netherlands, The United States and Germany), male productivity has been more negatively affected by the pandemic. Overall, female research productivity seems to have been more resilient to the disruptive effect of Covid-19 pandemic, although the momentum of female researchers has been negatively affected in a comparable manner to that of males.

摘要

超过 7500 万篇学术文章的书目属性被研究,整体研究生产力的趋势作为研究领域(1970-2020 年期间)和作者性别(2006-2020 年期间)的函数进行了分析。还调查了 COVID-19 大流行的潜在破坏性影响。在过去的十年中(2010-2020 年),出版物的年数量每年都在增加,其中单年的相对增长最大,2019 年增长了 6%以上。但这种势头在 2020 年中断了。趋势表明,环境科学与工程环境一直是增长最快的研究领域。由于 COVID-19 大流行,学术出版模式的中断在各个领域分布不均,计算机科学、工程和社会科学的下降最为显著。男性和女性生产力的总体趋势表明,就出版物绝对数量而言,性别差距似乎没有在任何国家缩小。男性和女性作者之间绝对差距的趋势要么是平行的(例如,加拿大、澳大利亚、英国、美国),要么是扩大的(例如,大多数国家,特别是中东国家)。然而,就女性与男性生产力的比例而言,差距几乎总是在缩小,尽管各国的速度明显不同。虽然有些国家接近 0.7 的比例,并且朝着女性与男性生产力 0.9 的比例迈进,但我们的估计表明,某些国家(特别是中东国家)在未来 100 年内将无法达到这些目标。如果没有干预性政策,这些国家将继续存在显著差距。与 2020 年前建立的趋势相比,大流行第一年的研究生产力的下降或增加,对男性和女性作者来说通常是平行的。大流行造成的破坏在性别方面没有实质性差异。然而,在少数情况下发现了相反的趋势。观察到,在一些国家(例如荷兰、美国和德国),男性生产力受大流行的影响更为负面。总体而言,女性研究生产力似乎对 COVID-19 大流行的破坏性影响更具弹性,尽管女性研究人员的势头与男性一样受到负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba1f/9365186/9a23aa35ec14/pone.0271998.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验