Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology and Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Mar;30(3):341-347. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8710. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, most faculty in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) began working from home, including many who were simultaneously caring for children. The objective was to assess associations of gender and parental status with self-reported academic productivity before (, mid-January to mid-March 2020) and during the pandemic (, mid-March to mid-May 2020). STEMM faculty in the United States ( = 284, 67.6% women, 57.0% with children younger than the age of 18 years living at home) completed a survey about the number of hours worked and the frequency of academic productivity activities. There was no significant difference in the hours worked per week by gender (men, [standard deviation, SD] = 45.8 [16.7], women = 43.1 [16.3]). Faculty with 0-5-year-old children reported significantly fewer work hours (33.7 [13.9]) compared to all other groups (No children = 49.2 [14.9], 6-11 years old = 48.3 [13.9], and 12-17 years old = 49.5 [13.9], < 0.0001). Women's self-reported first/corresponding author's and coauthor's article submissions decreased significantly between the two time periods; men's productivity metrics did not change. Faculty with 0-5-year-old children completed significantly fewer peer review assignments, attended fewer funding panel meetings, and submitted fewer first authors' articles during the pandemic compared to the previous period. Those with children aged 6 years or older at home or without children at home reported significant increases or stable productivity. Overall, significant disparities were observed in academic productivity by gender and child age during the pandemic and if confirmed by further research, should be considered by academic institutions and funding agencies when making decisions regarding funding and hiring as well as promotion and tenure.
由于 COVID-19 大流行,大多数科学、技术、工程、数学和医学(STEMM)领域的教师开始在家工作,其中许多人同时还要照顾孩子。本研究旨在评估在疫情(2020 年 3 月中旬至 5 月中旬)之前(2020 年 1 月中旬至 3 月中旬)和期间,按性别和父母身份报告的学术生产力的关联。在美国的 STEMM 教师( = 284 人,67.6%为女性,57.0%有年龄在 18 岁以下且同住的孩子)完成了一份关于工作时间和学术生产力活动频率的调查。性别之间每周工作时间没有显著差异(男性,[标准差,SD] = 45.8 [16.7],女性 = 43.1 [16.3])。与其他所有群体相比,有 0-5 岁孩子的教师报告的工作时间明显减少(33.7 [13.9])(无孩子 = 49.2 [14.9],6-11 岁 = 48.3 [13.9],12-17 岁 = 49.5 [13.9], < 0.0001)。女性作为第一作者/通讯作者和合著者提交的论文投稿量在两个时间段之间显著减少;男性的生产力指标没有变化。有 0-5 岁孩子的教师在疫情期间完成的同行评审任务、参加的资助小组会议和提交的第一作者文章明显少于前一时期。家中有 6 岁或 6 岁以上孩子或没有孩子的教师报告生产力显著增加或保持稳定。总体而言,在疫情期间,学术生产力按性别和儿童年龄存在显著差异,如果进一步的研究证实了这一点,学术机构和资助机构在决定资助、招聘以及晋升和终身教职时应考虑这些差异。