• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Academic Productivity Differences by Gender and Child Age in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间科学、技术、工程、数学和医学领域男女教师的学术生产力差异及其与子女年龄的关系
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Mar;30(3):341-347. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8710. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
2
Experiences of a Health System's Faculty, Staff, and Trainees' Career Development, Work Culture, and Childcare Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间医疗体系教职员工及学员的职业发展、工作文化和育儿需求的体验
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e213997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3997.
3
Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding among U.S. academic radiation oncology faculty.美国学术放射肿瘤学教师群体中的发表生产力、学术地位、职业持续时间和资金方面的性别差异。
Acad Med. 2014 May;89(5):767-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000229.
4
Work-Life Balance and Productivity Among Academic Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Latent Class Analysis.新冠疫情期间学术教师的工作-生活平衡和生产力:潜在类别分析。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Mar;31(3):321-330. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0277. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
5
Re: "Academic Productivity Differences by Gender and Child Age in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic," by Krukowski et al.回复:克鲁科夫斯基等人所著的《新冠疫情期间科学、技术、工程、数学和医学领域教职员工按性别和子女年龄划分的学术生产力差异》
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Sep;30(9):1365-1366. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0199.
6
Re: "Academic Productivity Differences by Gender and Child Age in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic" by Krukowski et al.关于:克鲁科夫斯基等人所著的《新冠疫情期间科学、技术、工程、数学和医学领域教职员工按性别和子女年龄划分的学术生产力差异》
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Jul;30(7):1052-1053. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0238. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
7
Academic Medicine Faculty Perceptions of Work-Life Balance Before and Since the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情前后,医学学术领域对工作与生活平衡的看法
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113539. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13539.
8
COVID-19 Threatens Progress Toward Gender Equity Within Academic Medicine.COVID-19 威胁着学术医学领域内性别平等的进展。
Acad Med. 2021 Jun 1;96(6):813-816. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003782.
9
Gender Differences in National Institutes of Health Grant Submissions Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情前后 NIH 资助申请中的性别差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Sep;31(9):1241-1245. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0182.
10
Gender Differences in Research Productivity of Academic Physicians Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.学术型医生在 COVID-19 大流行前后的研究生产力中的性别差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Jul;32(7):801-807. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0390. Epub 2023 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Institutional Supports for Early Career Researchers During Crises: COVID-19 Pandemic Case Study.危机期间对早期职业研究人员的机构支持:以新冠疫情为例的案例研究
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Aug 29;17:417-430. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S533632. eCollection 2025.
2
An Analysis of University Mental Health Initiatives Aimed at Academic Workers.针对高校教职工的大学心理健康倡议分析
New Solut. 2025 Nov;35(3):292-303. doi: 10.1177/10482911251366462. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
3
Evaluating Covid-19 publications for sex and gender-specific health content: A bibliometric analysis.评估关于新冠病毒病(Covid-19)的出版物中的性别特异性健康内容:一项文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 19;20(2):e0316812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316812. eCollection 2025.
4
Pandemic Impact on Research Faculty in Academic Medicine: A Mixed Method Study.大流行对学术医学研究人员的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2025 Jan 8;6(1):21-28. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0091. eCollection 2025.
5
The influence of kindness on academics' identity, well-being and stress.善良对学者身份认同、幸福感和压力的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 22;19(10):e0312269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312269. eCollection 2024.
6
Time to Publication in Medical Education Journals: An Analysis of Publication Timelines During COVID-19 (2019-2022).医学教育期刊的出版时间:COVID-19(2019-2022 年)期间的出版时间表分析。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Oct 11;13(1):507-517. doi: 10.5334/pme.1287. eCollection 2024.
7
Estimating the productivity cost of administrative duties and work-related engagements from submission trends during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.根据新冠疫情封锁期间的提交趋势估算行政职责和与工作相关活动的生产力成本。
mBio. 2024 Jul 17;15(7):e0146724. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01467-24. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
8
Perspectives on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Research: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Pediatric Otolaryngologists.新冠疫情对研究影响的观点:儿科耳鼻喉科医生的横断面调查
Cureus. 2024 May 16;16(5):e60436. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60436. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Academia During the Time of COVID-19: Examining the Voices of Untenured Female Professors in STEM.新冠疫情时期的学术界:审视STEM领域非终身教职女性教授的声音
J Career Assess. 2022 Aug;30(3):573-589. doi: 10.1177/10690727211057441.
10
Exploring the stability of the gender gap in faculty perceptions of gender climate at a rural regional university.探讨农村地区大学教师对性别氛围感知的性别差距的稳定性。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 2;19(4):e0301285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301285. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists.新冠疫情对科学家的不平等影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):880-883. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y.
2
Preventing a Secondary Epidemic of Lost Early Career Scientists. Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Women with Children.防止早期职业科学家流失的二次流行。新冠疫情对有子女女性的影响。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Nov;17(11):1366-1370. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-589IP.
3
COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected.COVID-19 医学论文中女性第一作者的数量低于预期。
Elife. 2020 Jun 15;9:e58807. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58807.
4
Covid-19: Black people and other minorities are hardest hit in US.新冠疫情:美国黑人及其他少数族裔受影响最为严重。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 14;369:m1483. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1483.
5
Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty: A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia.为女性教职员工打造晋升之阶:学术界公平的综述与路线图。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 May;29(5):721-733. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8027. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
Comparison of National Institutes of Health Grant Amounts to First-Time Male and Female Principal Investigators.美国国立卫生研究院授予首次担任主要研究者的男性和女性的资助金额比较。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):898-900. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21944.
7
The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM.新父母在 STEM 领域职业轨迹的变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4182-4187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810862116. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
8
Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency.性别差距是由于对申请人的评价还是科学本身造成的?来自一个国家资助机构的自然实验。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):531-540. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4.
9
NIH funding longevity by gender.美国国立卫生研究院按性别资助寿命研究。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 31;115(31):7943-7948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800615115. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
10
Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals.《自然指数》期刊所揭示的高质量研究中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189136. eCollection 2018.

新冠疫情期间科学、技术、工程、数学和医学领域男女教师的学术生产力差异及其与子女年龄的关系

Academic Productivity Differences by Gender and Child Age in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine Faculty During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology and Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Mar;30(3):341-347. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8710. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2020.8710
PMID:33216682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7957370/
Abstract

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, most faculty in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) began working from home, including many who were simultaneously caring for children. The objective was to assess associations of gender and parental status with self-reported academic productivity before (, mid-January to mid-March 2020) and during the pandemic (, mid-March to mid-May 2020). STEMM faculty in the United States ( = 284, 67.6% women, 57.0% with children younger than the age of 18 years living at home) completed a survey about the number of hours worked and the frequency of academic productivity activities. There was no significant difference in the hours worked per week by gender (men, [standard deviation, SD] = 45.8 [16.7], women = 43.1 [16.3]). Faculty with 0-5-year-old children reported significantly fewer work hours (33.7 [13.9]) compared to all other groups (No children = 49.2 [14.9], 6-11 years old = 48.3 [13.9], and 12-17 years old = 49.5 [13.9],  < 0.0001). Women's self-reported first/corresponding author's and coauthor's article submissions decreased significantly between the two time periods; men's productivity metrics did not change. Faculty with 0-5-year-old children completed significantly fewer peer review assignments, attended fewer funding panel meetings, and submitted fewer first authors' articles during the pandemic compared to the previous period. Those with children aged 6 years or older at home or without children at home reported significant increases or stable productivity. Overall, significant disparities were observed in academic productivity by gender and child age during the pandemic and if confirmed by further research, should be considered by academic institutions and funding agencies when making decisions regarding funding and hiring as well as promotion and tenure.

摘要

由于 COVID-19 大流行,大多数科学、技术、工程、数学和医学(STEMM)领域的教师开始在家工作,其中许多人同时还要照顾孩子。本研究旨在评估在疫情(2020 年 3 月中旬至 5 月中旬)之前(2020 年 1 月中旬至 3 月中旬)和期间,按性别和父母身份报告的学术生产力的关联。在美国的 STEMM 教师( = 284 人,67.6%为女性,57.0%有年龄在 18 岁以下且同住的孩子)完成了一份关于工作时间和学术生产力活动频率的调查。性别之间每周工作时间没有显著差异(男性,[标准差,SD] = 45.8 [16.7],女性 = 43.1 [16.3])。与其他所有群体相比,有 0-5 岁孩子的教师报告的工作时间明显减少(33.7 [13.9])(无孩子 = 49.2 [14.9],6-11 岁 = 48.3 [13.9],12-17 岁 = 49.5 [13.9], < 0.0001)。女性作为第一作者/通讯作者和合著者提交的论文投稿量在两个时间段之间显著减少;男性的生产力指标没有变化。有 0-5 岁孩子的教师在疫情期间完成的同行评审任务、参加的资助小组会议和提交的第一作者文章明显少于前一时期。家中有 6 岁或 6 岁以上孩子或没有孩子的教师报告生产力显著增加或保持稳定。总体而言,在疫情期间,学术生产力按性别和儿童年龄存在显著差异,如果进一步的研究证实了这一点,学术机构和资助机构在决定资助、招聘以及晋升和终身教职时应考虑这些差异。