Suppr超能文献

2020年加拿大健康与社会服务机构图书馆与信息服务CHLA标准

CHLA Standards for Library and Information Services in Canadian Health & Social Services Institutions 2020.

作者信息

Frati Francesca, Oja Lori Anne, Kleinberg Julia

出版信息

J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 2;42(1):14-44. doi: 10.29173/jchla29526. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Abstract

The following standards, with supporting evidence, are intended to serve as a guide to structuring minimum library services within health and social services institutions across all Canadian provinces and territories. The Standards are not intended to be aspirational. The aim of the Task Force was to ensure that the Standards update would not be so removed from the current realities and landscape that they became unattainable to many libraries. For this reason, some Standards outline requirements that are essential to the minimum function of the library, and other Standards provide recommendations only. The intended use of the Standards is to set a baseline for the provision of essential library services and resources and aid in advocating for adequate resources. It is important to note, however, that the Task Force does not intend for the Standards to prevent libraries from reaching a more advanced level of service, and we hope that in their current form they will not be a hindrance to excellence or innovation. Once published, the version of the Standards made freely available on the Canada Health Libraries Association website [1] shall henceforth and always be considered the most recent and active version of the Standards and is the version that should be used to inform practice. The Standards Standing Committee will institute a regular review and updating schedule, ensuring the currency of the Standards.

摘要

以下标准及相关支撑证据旨在为加拿大所有省份和地区的卫生与社会服务机构构建最低限度的图书馆服务提供指导。这些标准并非理想化的目标。特别工作组的目的是确保标准更新不会脱离当前现实情况和格局,导致许多图书馆难以企及。因此,一些标准概述了图书馆最低功能所必需的要求,而其他标准仅提供建议。这些标准的预期用途是为提供基本图书馆服务和资源设定基线,并有助于争取足够的资源。然而,需要注意的是,特别工作组并非旨在让这些标准阻碍图书馆达到更高的服务水平,我们希望以当前形式呈现的标准不会成为追求卓越或创新的障碍。一旦发布,在加拿大健康图书馆协会网站[1]上免费提供的标准版本将自此一直被视为标准的最新和现行版本,并且是应用于实践的版本。标准常务委员会将制定定期审查和更新计划,确保标准的时效性。

相似文献

2
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共4部分,第1部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
7
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).加拿大避孕共识(共四部分,第二部分)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
9
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.

本文引用的文献

3
Using Contingent Medical Librarians to Address Workforce Staffing Dilemmas.
Med Ref Serv Q. 2019 Oct-Dec;38(4):376-386. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2019.1657732.
6
Hospital library closures and consolidations: a case series.医院图书馆关闭与合并:病例系列。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Apr;107(2):129-136. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.520. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
8
Health sciences libraries in the United States: new directions.美国健康科学图书馆:新方向。
Health Info Libr J. 2017 Dec;34(4):307-311. doi: 10.1111/hir.12199. Epub 2017 Oct 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验