Suppr超能文献

临床测试预测认知障碍老年驾驶员的道路表现。

Clinical Tests Predicting On-Road Performance in Older Drivers with Cognitive Impairment.

出版信息

Can J Occup Ther. 2023 Mar;90(1):44-54. doi: 10.1177/00084174221117708. Epub 2022 Aug 10.

Abstract

The Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B) and Useful Field of View® (UFOV) can predict on-road outcomes in drivers with cognitive impairment (CI); however, studies have not included drivers referred for comprehensive driving evaluations (CDEs), who typically have more severe CI. We determined the predictive ability of Trails B and UFOV on pass/fail on-road outcomes in drivers with CI (Montreal Cognitive Assessment <26) referred for CDEs. Retrospective data collection from two driving assessments centers (  =  100, mean age  =  76.2  ±  8.8 years). The Trails B (area under the curve [AUC]  =  .70) and UFOV subtests 2 (AUC  =  .73) and 3 (AUC  =  .76) predicted pass/fail outcomes. A cut-point ≥467 ms on UFOV subtest 3 better-predicted pass/fail outcomes with 78.9% sensitivity and 73.5% specificity. In comparison, a cut-point ≥3.58 min on Trails B had lower sensitivity (73.7%) and specificity (61.8%). The UFOV subtest 3 may be more useful than the Trails B for predicting pass/fail outcomes in drivers with more severe CI referred for CDEs.

摘要

《连线测试 B 部分(Trails B)》和《有用视野测试》(UFOV)可预测认知障碍(CI)驾驶员的道路行驶结果;然而,这些研究并未纳入因全面驾驶评估(CDE)而转诊的驾驶员,他们通常有更严重的 CI。我们确定了 Trails B 和 UFOV 在认知障碍转诊至 CDE 的驾驶员的道路行驶结果(蒙特利尔认知评估 <26)中的预测能力。对两个驾驶评估中心的回顾性数据收集(  =  100,平均年龄  =  76.2  ±  8.8 岁)。Trails B(曲线下面积 [AUC]  =  .70)和 UFOV 子测试 2(AUC  =  .73)和 3(AUC  =  .76)预测了通过/失败的结果。UFOV 子测试 3 的截点≥467 ms 更好地预测了通过/失败的结果,敏感性为 78.9%,特异性为 73.5%。相比之下,Trails B 的截点≥3.58 min 具有较低的敏感性(73.7%)和特异性(61.8%)。在认知障碍更严重转诊至 CDE 的驾驶员中,UFOV 子测试 3 可能比 Trails B 更有助于预测通过/失败的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a328/9923206/c567f8308e5b/10.1177_00084174221117708-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验