通过有用视野和连线测试 B 部分预测老年驾驶员的道路行驶表现。
Predicting older driver on-road performance by means of the useful field of view and trail making test part B.
机构信息
School of Occupational Therapy, Elborn College, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9.
出版信息
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Sep-Oct;67(5):574-82. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.008136.
Abstract
The Useful Field of View(®) (UFOV) and Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B) are measures of divided attention. We determined which measure was more accurate in predicting on-road outcomes among drivers (N = 198, mean age = 73.86, standard deviation = 6.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves for the UFOV (Risk Index [RI] and Subtests 1-3) and Trails B significantly predicted on-road outcomes. Contrasting Trails B with the UFOV RI and subtests, the only difference was found between the UFOV RI and Trails B, indicating the UFOV RI was the best predictor of on-road outcomes. Misclassifications of drivers totaled 28 for the UFOV RI, 62 for Trails B, and 58 for UFOV Subtest 2. The UFOV RI is a superior test in predicting on-road outcomes, but the Trails B has acceptable accuracy and is comparable to the other UFOV subtests.
摘要
视野测试（®）（UFOV）和连线测试 B（Trails B）是注意力分配的衡量指标。我们确定了在预测驾驶员道路表现方面哪种衡量指标更准确（N=198，平均年龄=73.86，标准差=6.05）。UFOV（风险指数[RI]和分测验 1-3）和 Trails B 的受试者工作特征曲线显著预测了道路表现。与 Trails B 相比，UFOV RI 和分测验，仅发现 UFOV RI 和 Trails B 之间存在差异，表明 UFOV RI 是道路表现的最佳预测指标。UFOV RI 对驾驶员的误分类总计为 28，Trails B 为 62，UFOV 分测验 2 为 58。UFOV RI 是预测道路表现的更好测试，但 Trails B 具有可接受的准确性且与其他 UFOV 分测验相当。
相似文献
1
Predicting older driver on-road performance by means of the useful field of view and trail making test part B.
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Sep-Oct;67(5):574-82. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.008136.
2
Clinical Tests Predicting On-Road Performance in Older Drivers with Cognitive Impairment.
Can J Occup Ther. 2023 Mar;90(1):44-54. doi: 10.1177/00084174221117708. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
3
Visual Attention Cut Points for Driver Fitness in Parkinson's Disease.
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2019 Oct;39(4):257-265. doi: 10.1177/1539449219836689. Epub 2019 Mar 24.
4
A pilot study: Can the UFOV assessment be used as a repeated measure to determine timing of on-road assessment in stroke?
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Feb;66(1):5-12. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12456. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
5
Driving Characteristics of Older Drivers and Their Relationship to the Useful Field of View Test.
Gerontology. 2017;63(2):180-188. doi: 10.1159/000448281. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
6
Establishing criterion validity of the Useful Field of View assessment and Stroke Drivers' Screening Assessment: comparison to the result of on-road assessment.
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Jan-Feb;64(1):114-22. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.1.114.
7
UFOV performance and driving ability following traumatic brain injury.
Brain Inj. 2006 May;20(5):455-61. doi: 10.1080/02699050600664541.
8
Older drivers: On-road and off-road test results.
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jul;43(4):1348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
9
Can we improve clinical prediction of at-risk older drivers?
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:537-47. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.037. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
10
Driving with Parkinson's disease: Cut points for clinical predictors of on-road outcomes: La conduite automobile et la maladie de Parkinson : Points de découpage pour les prédicteurs clinique des résultats des épreuves sur route.
Can J Occup Ther. 2018 Jun;85(3):232-241. doi: 10.1177/0008417418755458. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
引用本文的文献
1
Characteristics of real-world driving behavior in people with schizophrenia: a naturalistic study utilizing drive recorders.
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Apr 18;11(1):67. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00613-1.
2
Different deployments of attentional breadth selectively predict UFOV task performance in older adults.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 26;9(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00569-3.
3
Could driving help us to "see better"? A comparative assessment of saccadic efficiency, visual speed, and attention.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 27;24(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03349-1.
4
Validation of a computerized driving simulator test of cognitive abilities for fitness-to-drive assessments.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1294965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1294965. eCollection 2023.
5
Switching it up: Activity diversity and cognitive functioning in later life.
Psychol Aging. 2023 Sep;38(6):483-493. doi: 10.1037/pag0000770. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
6
Clinical Tests Predicting On-Road Performance in Older Drivers with Cognitive Impairment.
Can J Occup Ther. 2023 Mar;90(1):44-54. doi: 10.1177/00084174221117708. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
7
Neuropsychological Correlates of Changes in Driving Behavior Among Clinically Healthy Older Adults.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Oct 6;77(10):1769-1778. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac101.
8
Predicting Autonomous Shuttle Acceptance in Older Drivers Based on Technology Readiness/Use/Barriers, Life Space, Driving Habits, and Cognition.
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 2;12:798762. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.798762. eCollection 2021.
9
Arterial Stiffness and Cardiorespiratory Fitness Are Associated With Cognitive Function in Older Adults.
Behav Med. 2022 Jan-Mar;48(1):54-65. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2020.1825921. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
10
Validation of Brief Screening Tools to Identify Impaired Driving Among Older Adults in Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208263. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8263.
本文引用的文献
1
Usefulness of screening tools for predicting driving performance in people with Parkinson's disease.
Am J Occup Ther. 2011 Sep-Oct;65(5):579-88. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.001073.
2
Assessment of driving performance using a simulator protocol: validity and reproducibility.
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Mar-Apr;64(2):336-40. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.2.336.
3
Driving performance and susceptibility to simulator sickness: are they related?
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Mar-Apr;64(2):288-95. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.2.288.
4
Near-vision acuity levels and performance on neuropsychological assessments used in occupational therapy.
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Jan-Feb;64(1):105-13. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.1.105.
5
Clinical predictors of older driver performance on a standardized road test.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008 Oct;9(5):456-62. doi: 10.1080/15389580802260026.
6
Predictability of clinical assessments for driving performance.
J Safety Res. 2008;39(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
7
A prospective, population-based study of the role of visual impairment in motor vehicle crashes among older drivers: the SEE study.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;48(4):1483-91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0474.
8
What's under the ROC? An introduction to receiver operating characteristics curves.
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;52(2):121-8. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200210.
9
Predictors of driving ability following stroke: a systematic review.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):98-114. doi: 10.1310/tsr1401-98.
10
Impaired visual search in drivers with Parkinson's disease.
Ann Neurol. 2006 Oct;60(4):407-13. doi: 10.1002/ana.20958.
Zotero 插件