通过有用视野和连线测试 B 部分预测老年驾驶员的道路行驶表现。
Predicting older driver on-road performance by means of the useful field of view and trail making test part B.
机构信息
School of Occupational Therapy, Elborn College, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5B9.
出版信息
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Sep-Oct;67(5):574-82. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.008136.
Abstract
The Useful Field of View(®) (UFOV) and Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B) are measures of divided attention. We determined which measure was more accurate in predicting on-road outcomes among drivers (N = 198, mean age = 73.86, standard deviation = 6.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves for the UFOV (Risk Index [RI] and Subtests 1-3) and Trails B significantly predicted on-road outcomes. Contrasting Trails B with the UFOV RI and subtests, the only difference was found between the UFOV RI and Trails B, indicating the UFOV RI was the best predictor of on-road outcomes. Misclassifications of drivers totaled 28 for the UFOV RI, 62 for Trails B, and 58 for UFOV Subtest 2. The UFOV RI is a superior test in predicting on-road outcomes, but the Trails B has acceptable accuracy and is comparable to the other UFOV subtests.
摘要
视野测试（®）（UFOV）和连线测试 B（Trails B）是注意力分配的衡量指标。我们确定了在预测驾驶员道路表现方面哪种衡量指标更准确（N=198，平均年龄=73.86，标准差=6.05）。UFOV（风险指数[RI]和分测验 1-3）和 Trails B 的受试者工作特征曲线显著预测了道路表现。与 Trails B 相比，UFOV RI 和分测验，仅发现 UFOV RI 和 Trails B 之间存在差异，表明 UFOV RI 是道路表现的最佳预测指标。UFOV RI 对驾驶员的误分类总计为 28，Trails B 为 62，UFOV 分测验 2 为 58。UFOV RI 是预测道路表现的更好测试，但 Trails B 具有可接受的准确性且与其他 UFOV 分测验相当。
相似文献
1
Predicting older driver on-road performance by means of the useful field of view and trail making test part B.通过有用视野和连线测试 B 部分预测老年驾驶员的道路行驶表现。
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Sep-Oct;67(5):574-82. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.008136.
2
Clinical Tests Predicting On-Road Performance in Older Drivers with Cognitive Impairment.临床测试预测认知障碍老年驾驶员的道路表现。
Can J Occup Ther. 2023 Mar;90(1):44-54. doi: 10.1177/00084174221117708. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
3
Visual Attention Cut Points for Driver Fitness in Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病患者驾驶适宜性的视觉注意力切点
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2019 Oct;39(4):257-265. doi: 10.1177/1539449219836689. Epub 2019 Mar 24.
4
A pilot study: Can the UFOV assessment be used as a repeated measure to determine timing of on-road assessment in stroke?一项试点研究：UFOV评估能否用作重复测量手段来确定中风患者上路评估的时机？
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Feb;66(1):5-12. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12456. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
5
Driving Characteristics of Older Drivers and Their Relationship to the Useful Field of View Test.老年驾驶员的驾驶特性及其与有用视野测试的关系。
Gerontology. 2017;63(2):180-188. doi: 10.1159/000448281. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
6
Establishing criterion validity of the Useful Field of View assessment and Stroke Drivers' Screening Assessment: comparison to the result of on-road assessment.建立有用视野评估和中风驱动因素筛查评估的标准效度：与道路评估结果的比较。
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Jan-Feb;64(1):114-22. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.1.114.
7
UFOV performance and driving ability following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后的有用视野（UFOV）表现与驾驶能力
Brain Inj. 2006 May;20(5):455-61. doi: 10.1080/02699050600664541.
8
Older drivers: On-road and off-road test results.老年驾驶员：路测和场测结果。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jul;43(4):1348-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
9
Can we improve clinical prediction of at-risk older drivers?我们能否提高对高危老年驾驶员的临床预测能力？
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:537-47. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.037. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
10
Driving with Parkinson's disease: Cut points for clinical predictors of on-road outcomes: La conduite automobile et la maladie de Parkinson : Points de découpage pour les prédicteurs clinique des résultats des épreuves sur route.帕金森病患者驾车：道路驾驶结果临床预测指标的切点：帕金森病与驾车：道路测试结果临床预测指标的切点
Can J Occup Ther. 2018 Jun;85(3):232-241. doi: 10.1177/0008417418755458. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
引用本文的文献
1
Characteristics of real-world driving behavior in people with schizophrenia: a naturalistic study utilizing drive recorders.精神分裂症患者现实世界驾驶行为的特征：一项使用行车记录仪的自然主义研究。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Apr 18;11(1):67. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00613-1.
2
Different deployments of attentional breadth selectively predict UFOV task performance in older adults.不同注意力广度的配置方式可选择性地预测老年人 UFOV 任务表现。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 26;9(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00569-3.
3
Could driving help us to "see better"? A comparative assessment of saccadic efficiency, visual speed, and attention.开车能帮助我们“看得更清楚”吗？扫视效率、视觉速度和注意力的比较评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 27;24(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03349-1.
4
Validation of a computerized driving simulator test of cognitive abilities for fitness-to-drive assessments.用于驾驶适宜性评估的认知能力计算机化驾驶模拟器测试的验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1294965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1294965. eCollection 2023.
5
Switching it up: Activity diversity and cognitive functioning in later life.转换方式：晚年的活动多样性与认知功能。
Psychol Aging. 2023 Sep;38(6):483-493. doi: 10.1037/pag0000770. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
6
Clinical Tests Predicting On-Road Performance in Older Drivers with Cognitive Impairment.临床测试预测认知障碍老年驾驶员的道路表现。
Can J Occup Ther. 2023 Mar;90(1):44-54. doi: 10.1177/00084174221117708. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
7
Neuropsychological Correlates of Changes in Driving Behavior Among Clinically Healthy Older Adults.临床健康老年人驾驶行为变化的神经心理学相关性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Oct 6;77(10):1769-1778. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac101.
8
Predicting Autonomous Shuttle Acceptance in Older Drivers Based on Technology Readiness/Use/Barriers, Life Space, Driving Habits, and Cognition.基于技术准备度/使用情况/障碍、生活空间、驾驶习惯和认知来预测老年驾驶员对自动穿梭巴士的接受度
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 2;12:798762. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.798762. eCollection 2021.
9
Arterial Stiffness and Cardiorespiratory Fitness Are Associated With Cognitive Function in Older Adults.动脉僵硬度和心肺适能与老年人的认知功能有关。
Behav Med. 2022 Jan-Mar;48(1):54-65. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2020.1825921. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
10
Validation of Brief Screening Tools to Identify Impaired Driving Among Older Adults in Australia.验证简短的筛查工具以识别澳大利亚老年人群中的驾驶障碍。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208263. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8263.
本文引用的文献
1
Usefulness of screening tools for predicting driving performance in people with Parkinson's disease.用于预测帕金森病患者驾驶表现的筛查工具的实用性。
Am J Occup Ther. 2011 Sep-Oct;65(5):579-88. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.001073.
2
Assessment of driving performance using a simulator protocol: validity and reproducibility.使用模拟器方案评估驾驶表现：有效性和可重复性。
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Mar-Apr;64(2):336-40. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.2.336.
3
Driving performance and susceptibility to simulator sickness: are they related?驾驶表现与模拟器晕动症易感性：二者是否相关？
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Mar-Apr;64(2):288-95. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.2.288.
4
Near-vision acuity levels and performance on neuropsychological assessments used in occupational therapy.职业治疗中使用的近视力 acuity 水平和神经心理学评估表现。
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Jan-Feb;64(1):105-13. doi: 10.5014/ajot.64.1.105.
5
Clinical predictors of older driver performance on a standardized road test.标准化道路测试中老年驾驶员表现的临床预测因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008 Oct;9(5):456-62. doi: 10.1080/15389580802260026.
6
Predictability of clinical assessments for driving performance.驾驶性能临床评估的可预测性。
J Safety Res. 2008;39(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
7
A prospective, population-based study of the role of visual impairment in motor vehicle crashes among older drivers: the SEE study.一项基于人群的前瞻性研究：视觉障碍在老年驾驶员机动车碰撞事故中的作用——SEE研究。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;48(4):1483-91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0474.
8
What's under the ROC? An introduction to receiver operating characteristics curves.ROC曲线背后是什么？接收器操作特性曲线介绍。
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;52(2):121-8. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200210.
9
Predictors of driving ability following stroke: a systematic review.中风后驾驶能力的预测因素：一项系统综述。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):98-114. doi: 10.1310/tsr1401-98.
10
Impaired visual search in drivers with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者驾车时视觉搜索能力受损。
Ann Neurol. 2006 Oct;60(4):407-13. doi: 10.1002/ana.20958.
Zotero 插件