Suppr超能文献

氯胺酮-美托咪定与替马喷他佐-美托咪定用于半圈养猎豹()的固定。

Ketamine-medetomidine compared to tiletamine-zolazepam-medetomidine for immobilisation of semi-captive cheetahs ().

机构信息

Department of Companion Animal Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2022 Jun;93(1):25-30.

Abstract

The immobilisation time and cardiopulmonary effects of ketamine-medetomidine (KM) and tiletamine-zolazepam-medetomidine (TZM) were compared in semi-captive cheetahs (). Seven healthy adult cheetahs were included in a randomised prospective crossover study. Each cheetah was immobilised on two occasions by remote injection, once with a combination of ketamine (4.93 ± 0.75 mg/kg) and medetomidine (0.038 ± 0.003 mg/kg) (KM) and once with tiletamine-zolazepam (1.16 ± 0.12 mg/kg) and medetomidine (0.039 ± 0.002 mg/kg) (TZM). Time to safe approach, characterised by absent responses to an ear flick and tail tug, was recorded as the immobilisation time. Following immobilisation, cardiopulmonary parameters were recorded, and an arterial blood gas sample analysed. Data is reported as mean ± SD and compared using a general linear mixed model ( < 0.05). Immobilisation times were no different between combinations, 11.4 ± 5.7 minutes for KM and 13.2 ± 4.6 minutes for TZM ( = 0.528). Systolic blood pressure was 218 ± 22 mmHg for KM and 210 ± 28 mmHg for TZM ( = 0.594). There was moderate hypoxaemia with both combinations with arterial oxygen partial pressure of 58.4 ± 6.6 mmHg for KM and 61.3 ± 4.2 mmHg for TZM ( = 0.368). Haematocrit was higher with KM (40.7 ± 2.5) than TZM (35.8 ± 2.8, = 0.007). There were differences in electrolytes, with TZM resulting in higher serum potassium (4.3 ± 0.2 mmol/L, < 0.001) and glucose (11.8 ± 2.9 mmol/L, = 0.039) than KM. Both combinations provided acceptable immobilisation for field use, although severe hypertension was a consistent finding. Supplementation with oxygen is recommended with both combinations.

摘要

研究比较了氯胺酮-美托咪定(KM)和替马唑仑-唑拉西泮-美托咪定(TZM)在半圈养猎豹中的固定时间和心肺效应。将 7 只健康成年猎豹纳入随机前瞻性交叉研究。每只猎豹通过遥控注射进行两次麻醉,一次为氯胺酮(4.93±0.75mg/kg)和咪达唑仑(0.038±0.003mg/kg)(KM)组合,一次为替马唑仑-唑拉西泮(1.16±0.12mg/kg)和咪达唑仑(0.039±0.002mg/kg)(TZM)组合。安全接近时间(表现为对耳瓣和尾拉无反应)被记录为固定时间。固定后,记录心肺参数,并分析动脉血气样本。数据以平均值±标准差表示,并使用一般线性混合模型进行比较(<0.05)。KM 和 TZM 的固定时间无差异,分别为 11.4±5.7 分钟和 13.2±4.6 分钟(=0.528)。KM 的收缩压为 218±22mmHg,TZM 为 210±28mmHg(=0.594)。两种组合均出现中度低氧血症,KM 的动脉氧分压为 58.4±6.6mmHg,TZM 为 61.3±4.2mmHg(=0.368)。KM 的红细胞压积(40.7±2.5)高于 TZM(35.8±2.8,=0.007)。电解质存在差异,TZM 导致血清钾(4.3±0.2mmol/L,<0.001)和血糖(11.8±2.9mmol/L,=0.039)高于 KM。两种组合均适用于野外使用,但固定时间均出现严重高血压。建议两种组合均补充氧气。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验