• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者及其他利益相关者在临床实践指南制定中的重要作用。

The Meaningful Role of Patients, and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Practice Guideline Development.

作者信息

Mikdashi Jamal

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 10 South Pine Street, Suite 834, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2022 Aug;48(3):691-703. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.rdc.2022.05.002
PMID:35953231
Abstract

Patient participation is an integral component in the development of clinical practice guidelines. However, patient engagement remains suboptimal, which signifies a predicament in guideline's legitimacy and transparency. Limited budgets, logistic constraints, and discordance in patients' and researchers' perception of a meaningful involvement are some barriers that hinder patient engagement. Advancing skill development across various roles within the guideline's process will enrich patient's contribution and allow them to voice their experience, knowledge, perspective, and concerns. Continuing patient education and evaluation of their engagement on both outcome and process will facilitate team cohesion, trustworthiness, and value to achieve optimal quality of care.

摘要

患者参与是临床实践指南制定过程中不可或缺的组成部分。然而,患者的参与度仍不尽人意,这意味着指南在合法性和透明度方面存在困境。预算有限、后勤限制以及患者与研究人员对有意义参与的认知不一致等,都是阻碍患者参与的一些障碍。在指南制定过程中提升不同角色的技能发展,将丰富患者的贡献,使他们能够表达自己的经验、知识、观点和关切。持续开展患者教育,并对其在结果和过程方面的参与情况进行评估,将促进团队凝聚力、可信度和价值,以实现最佳的医疗质量。

相似文献

1
The Meaningful Role of Patients, and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Practice Guideline Development.患者及其他利益相关者在临床实践指南制定中的重要作用。
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2022 Aug;48(3):691-703. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Patient engagement in cancer research from the patient's perspective.从患者角度看癌症研究中的患者参与。
Future Oncol. 2021 Oct;17(28):3717-3728. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1198. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?利益相关者对患者参与有哪些期望:这些期望得到满足了吗?
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1035-1045. doi: 10.1111/hex.12797. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
Matching researchers' needs and patients' contributions: practical tips for meaningful patient engagement from the field of rheumatology.匹配研究人员的需求和患者的贡献:风湿病学领域有意义的患者参与的实用技巧。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Mar;82(3):312-315. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223561. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
7
[Needs assessment to improve the applicability and methodological quality of a German S3 guideline].[提高德国S3指南适用性和方法学质量的需求评估]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Apr;131-132:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
8
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
9
Training curriculum to help patient representatives participate meaningfully in the development of clinical practice guidelines.培训课程,帮助患者代表有意义地参与临床实践指南的制定。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Dec;24(6):227-230. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111186. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
Recommendations for patient engagement in guideline development panels: A qualitative focus group study of guideline-naïve patients.患者参与指南制定小组的建议:一项针对初次接触指南患者的定性焦点小组研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0174329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174329. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying the attributes of adherence to tuberculosis treatment in Indonesia: A Delphi study.确定印度尼西亚结核病治疗依从性的属性:一项德尔菲研究。
Narra J. 2025 Apr;5(1):e1590. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.1590. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
2
[Involvement of representatives of patients and relatives in guideline processes : S3 guidelines on psychosocial therapies for severe mental illnesses breaks new ground].患者及家属代表参与指南制定过程:重度精神疾病心理社会治疗S3指南开辟了新天地
Nervenarzt. 2025 Jan;96(1):66-73. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01760-z. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
3
Best practice for the selection, design and implementation of UK Kidney Association guidelines: a modified Delphi consensus approach.
英国肾脏病学会指南的选择、设计和实施最佳实践:改良德尔菲共识方法。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 18;14(6):e085723. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085723.
4
EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners in rheumatology research: 2023 update.EULAR 关于患者研究伙伴参与风湿病学研究的建议:2023 年更新版。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Oct 21;83(11):1443-1453. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225566.
5
Patient research partner involvement in rheumatology research: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 updated EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners.患者研究伙伴参与风湿病学研究:系统文献回顾为 2023 年更新的 EULAR 患者研究伙伴参与建议提供信息。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Sep 30;83(10):1268-1277. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225567.