Suppr超能文献

患者参与指南制定小组的建议:一项针对初次接触指南患者的定性焦点小组研究。

Recommendations for patient engagement in guideline development panels: A qualitative focus group study of guideline-naïve patients.

作者信息

Armstrong Melissa J, Mullins C Daniel, Gronseth Gary S, Gagliardi Anna R

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.

Pharmaceutical Health Research Department, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0174329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174329. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and consumer engagement in clinical practice guideline development is internationally advocated, but limited research explores mechanisms for successful engagement.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the perspectives of potential patient/consumer guideline representatives on topics pertaining to engagement including guideline development group composition and barriers to and facilitators of engagement.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Participants were guideline-naïve volunteers for programs designed to link community members to academic research with diverse ages, gender, race, and degrees of experience interacting with health care professionals.

METHODS

Three focus groups and one key informant interview were conducted and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach.

RESULTS

Participants recommended small, diverse guideline development groups engaging multiple patient/consumer stakeholders with no prior relationships with each other or professional panel members. No consensus was achieved on the ideal balance of patient/consumer and professional stakeholders. Pre-meeting reading/training and an identified contact person were described as keys to successful early engagement; skilled facilitators, understandable speech and language, and established mechanisms for soliciting patient opinions were suggested to enhance engagement at meetings.

CONCLUSIONS

Most suggestions for effective patient/consumer engagement in guidelines require forethought and planning but little additional expense, making these strategies easily accessible to guideline developers desiring to achieve more meaningful patient and consumer engagement.

摘要

背景

患者和消费者参与临床实践指南的制定在国际上得到倡导,但探索成功参与机制的研究有限。

目的

调查潜在患者/消费者指南代表对与参与相关主题的看法,包括指南制定小组的组成以及参与的障碍和促进因素。

背景与参与者

参与者是参与旨在将社区成员与学术研究联系起来的项目的新手志愿者,他们年龄、性别、种族各异,与医疗保健专业人员互动的经验程度也不同。

方法

进行了三个焦点小组讨论和一次关键信息人访谈,并采用定性描述方法进行分析。

结果

参与者建议成立小型、多元化的指南制定小组,让多个患者/消费者利益相关者参与其中,他们彼此之间以及与专业小组成员之前没有关系。对于患者/消费者和专业利益相关者的理想平衡,未达成共识。会前阅读/培训和指定联系人被描述为成功早期参与的关键;建议配备熟练的主持人、通俗易懂的语言以及征求患者意见的既定机制,以加强会议期间的参与。

结论

关于患者/消费者有效参与指南制定的大多数建议需要事先考虑和规划,但无需额外费用,这使得希望实现更有意义的患者和消费者参与的指南制定者能够轻松采用这些策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c9a/5358846/18e7b6312abc/pone.0174329.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验