Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), 79098 Freiburg, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 4;19(15):9602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159602.
Workers' health surveillance is considered essential for employees' health and protection against hazardous working conditions. It is one part of occupational health care and thus one of four pillars of holistic workplace health management. In Germany, employers are obliged to provide mandatory and voluntary occupational health care (OHC) to employees, dependent on the defined occupational hazards. However, employees are not obliged to make use of voluntary OHC. No empirical information is available about the uptake of voluntary OHC by employees and the influencing factors in Germany. Thus, we carried out an explorative multi-perspective study with qualitative and quantitative elements to get insights from the view of occupational health physicians (OHPs) and employees. We conducted a survey among OHPs based on prior statements from two focus group discussions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to detect enablers and barriers regarding employee uptake of the offered voluntary OHC. We used extended qualitative methods among employees instead of an analogous survey. In total, 460 OHPs participated in the survey (response rate 29.1%), and 25 employees took part in interviews. Most of the employees had not heard the term voluntary OHC before, and only a few remembered respective occupational health care after explanatory request. In total, 78% of the OHPs assessed that employees always/mostly take up voluntary OHC. The most important attributed reason for non-uptake was that employees see no need for occupational health care when they feel healthy. The most important enabler for the perceived high uptake of voluntary OHC in the regression analysis was a positive attitude of the OHP toward voluntary OHC. While OHPs perceived that voluntary OHC was accepted by a majority of employees, this was not confirmed by the interviews with selected employees. This could indicate that the OHP respondents overestimated the amount of uptake. Since it became clear that employees are often unfamiliar with the terminology itself, we see a need for more and better information regarding the objectives and content of occupational health care to improve this important pillar of workplace health management.
职业健康监测被认为是员工健康和防范危险工作条件的必要条件。它是职业保健的一部分,因此也是整体工作场所健康管理的四大支柱之一。在德国,雇主有义务根据规定的职业危害为员工提供强制性和自愿性职业保健(OHC)。然而,员工没有义务使用自愿性 OHC。目前没有关于德国员工自愿性 OHC 的利用情况和影响因素的实证信息。因此,我们开展了一项探索性的多视角研究,结合定性和定量元素,从职业健康医生(OHP)和员工的角度获得深入了解。我们基于两次焦点小组讨论的先前陈述,对 OHP 进行了一项调查。我们进行了一项多元逻辑回归分析,以检测关于员工接受提供的自愿性 OHC 的促进因素和障碍。我们在员工中使用了扩展的定性方法,而不是类似的调查。共有 460 名 OHP 参与了调查(回应率为 29.1%),25 名员工参加了访谈。大多数员工之前从未听说过自愿性 OHC 一词,只有少数人在解释请求后记得各自的职业保健。总体而言,78%的 OHP 认为员工总是/大多会接受自愿性 OHC。未接受的最重要归因原因是员工在感到健康时认为不需要职业保健。回归分析中,认为自愿性 OHC 接受度高的最重要促进因素是 OHP 对自愿性 OHC 的积极态度。虽然 OHP 认为自愿性 OHC 被大多数员工接受,但这与对选定员工的访谈并不相符。这可能表明 OHP 受访者高估了接受程度。由于很明显员工通常不熟悉术语本身,因此我们认为需要更多和更好的关于职业保健的目标和内容的信息,以改善工作场所健康管理的这一重要支柱。