• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

排放交易体系、碳市场效率与企业创新。

Emission Trading System, Carbon Market Efficiency, and Corporate Innovations.

机构信息

Economics and Management School, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China.

Shanghai National Accounting Institute, Shanghai 201702, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9683. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159683.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159683
PMID:35955036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9368728/
Abstract

Taking China's emission trading system (ETS) pilot in 2013 as a quasi-natural experiment, this paper uses the difference-in-differences (DID) models to study whether the regional pilot ETS can promote technological innovation in enterprises. In addition, this paper examines the influence mechanism of the ETS innovation effect, with a focus on three key dimensions of the carbon market efficiency: market price effectiveness, market product diversity, and market order normativity. The results show that the pilot ETS has significantly promoted the technological innovation of regulated enterprises, specifically, 1.405*** for the total R&D investment, and 2.783*** for the number of patent applications. Moreover, the regional carbon price has a positive moderating effect on the innovation effect of ETS. Meanwhile, the innovation effect is more significant when the gap between the carbon price and the marginal abatement cost (MAC) of CO is smaller, when the carbon financial derivatives are more abundant, or when the local market supervision is stronger. This study provides empirical evidence for the improvement of the national unified market and provides useful policy implications for developing countries to design ETS suitable for their national conditions.

摘要

以 2013 年中国排放交易体系(ETS)试点为准自然实验,本文采用双重差分(DID)模型研究了区域试点 ETS 是否能促进企业的技术创新。此外,本文还检验了 ETS 创新效应的影响机制,重点关注碳市场效率的三个关键维度:市场价格有效性、市场产品多样性和市场秩序规范性。研究结果表明,试点 ETS 显著促进了受管制企业的技术创新,具体而言,总研发投资增加了 1.405***,专利申请数量增加了 2.783***。此外,区域碳价格对 ETS 的创新效应具有积极的调节作用。同时,当碳价与 CO 的边际减排成本(MAC)差距较小时,碳金融衍生品越丰富,或者当地市场监管越强,创新效应越显著。本研究为完善全国统一市场提供了经验证据,并为发展中国家设计适合本国国情的 ETS 提供了有益的政策启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/183b818a0a47/ijerph-19-09683-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/e10f58c76224/ijerph-19-09683-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/65179943ff6b/ijerph-19-09683-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/118ef5a19816/ijerph-19-09683-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/c71708393331/ijerph-19-09683-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/a37e892b9d4b/ijerph-19-09683-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/4f9e694271be/ijerph-19-09683-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/183b818a0a47/ijerph-19-09683-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/e10f58c76224/ijerph-19-09683-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/65179943ff6b/ijerph-19-09683-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/118ef5a19816/ijerph-19-09683-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/c71708393331/ijerph-19-09683-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/a37e892b9d4b/ijerph-19-09683-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/4f9e694271be/ijerph-19-09683-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26b/9368728/183b818a0a47/ijerph-19-09683-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Emission Trading System, Carbon Market Efficiency, and Corporate Innovations.排放交易体系、碳市场效率与企业创新。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9683. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159683.
2
The Impact of China's ETS on Corporate Green Governance Based on the Perspective of Corporate ESG Performance.基于企业 ESG 绩效视角的中国 ETS 对企业绿色治理的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032292.
3
Emission trading scheme, technological innovation, and competitiveness: Evidence from China's thermal power enterprises.排放交易计划、技术创新和竞争力:来自中国火力发电企业的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 15;320:115874. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115874. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
4
The impact of China's emission trading scheme policy on enterprise green technological innovation quality: evidence from eight high-carbon emission industries.中国碳排放权交易制度政策对企业绿色技术创新质量的影响:来自八个高碳排放行业的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(47):103877-103897. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29590-7. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
Do carbon emission trading scheme policies induce green technology innovation? New evidence from provincial green patents in China.碳排放交易计划政策是否会促进绿色技术创新?来自中国省级绿色专利的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(5):13342-13358. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22877-1. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
6
Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China's Pilot Emission Trading Scheme.排放交易是否能提高碳生产力?来自中国试点排放交易计划的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15):5522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155522.
7
Innovation spillover effect of the pilot carbon emission trading policy in China.中国碳排放权交易试点政策的创新溢出效应
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 12;9(9):e20062. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20062. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
China's Carbon Emissions and Trading Pilot, Political Connection, and Innovation Input of Publicly Listed Private Firms.中国碳排放权交易试点、政治关联与民营上市公司创新投入
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;17(17):6084. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176084.
9
Carbon emission trading scheme and corporate labor investment efficiency: evidence from China.碳排放交易计划与企业劳动投资效率:来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(39):90830-90843. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28656-w. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
10
Can China's carbon emissions trading scheme achieve a double dividend?中国碳排放权交易体系能否实现双重红利?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(33):50238-50255. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19453-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of China's regional carbon market pilots in reducing firm emissions.中国区域碳市场试点对企业减排的有效性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 28;118(52). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109912118.
2
Low-carbon innovation induced by emissions trading in China.中国碳排放交易机制下的低碳创新。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 9;10(1):4088. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12213-6.
3
How does emission trading reduce China's carbon intensity? An exploration using a decomposition and difference-in-differences approach.排放交易如何降低中国的碳强度?基于分解法和双重差分法的探究
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 1;676:514-523. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.303. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Controlling water pollution in developing and transition countries--lessons from three successful cases.发展中国家和转型国家的水污染控制——三个成功案例的经验教训。
J Environ Manage. 2006 Mar;78(4):405-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.05.007. Epub 2005 Sep 19.