School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, University Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia.
College of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 2;2022:7366063. doi: 10.1155/2022/7366063. eCollection 2022.
Telerehabilitation offers an alternative healthcare delivery remotely in a patient's environment at a lower cost, better accessibility, and equivalent quality to the standard approach. Several studies had examined the effectiveness of telerehabilitation inpatients with musculoskeletal disorders, and although there is evidence that it is at least equally effective as the standard care, the patient and rehabilitation professional satisfaction with the delivery method is not conclusive. A systematic review was conducted to study the patients' and rehabilitation professionals' satisfaction with telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. A search for relevant studies on 29 April 2021 was carried out in Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS). The search terms included "telerehabilitation," AND "satisfaction" AND "musculoskeletal disorders," "telehealth," "telemedicine," "patient experience," and "pain". Fifteen eligible studies with 12,341 patients were included in this systematic review. A report was included if it (a) assessed the satisfaction of patients or professionals or both as one of the outcomes of a telerehabilitation intervention, (b) included adults 18 years and above with musculoskeletal disorders, and (c) is an intervention study using a quantitative approach. The quality of studies was assessed using the critical appraisal checklist tool developed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Most of the studies reported that patients were satisfied with both telerehabilitation and face-to-face intervention. However, few studies reported that patients were more satisfied with telerehabilitation compared to face-to-face of intervention. Patients in one study had preferred the incorporation of telerehabilitation and face-to-face sessions. Two of three studies had reported overall satisfaction with telerehabilitation by the professionals. Overall, there is evidence that patients and rehabilitation professional are satisfied with telerehabilitation compared to face-to-face consultation.
远程康复在患者环境中以较低的成本提供了一种替代医疗服务方式,具有更好的可及性和与标准方法相当的质量。一些研究已经检查了远程康复在肌肉骨骼疾病患者中的有效性,尽管有证据表明它至少与标准护理同样有效,但患者和康复专业人员对交付方法的满意度尚无定论。进行了一项系统评价,以研究患者和康复专业人员对肌肉骨骼疾病远程康复的满意度。于 2021 年 4 月 29 日在 Medline/PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science(WOS)上进行了相关研究的搜索。搜索词包括“远程康复”、“满意度”和“肌肉骨骼疾病”、“远程医疗”、“远程医学”、“患者体验”和“疼痛”。这项系统评价纳入了 15 项符合条件的研究,共 12341 名患者。如果报告(a)评估了患者或专业人员的满意度或两者均作为远程康复干预的结果之一,(b)纳入了 18 岁及以上的肌肉骨骼疾病患者,且(c)是使用定量方法的干预研究,则纳入该报告。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)制定的批判性评估清单工具评估研究质量。大多数研究报告称,患者对远程康复和面对面干预都感到满意。然而,少数研究报告称,与面对面干预相比,患者对远程康复更满意。一项研究中的患者更喜欢将远程康复和面对面会议结合起来。三项研究中有两项报告了专业人员对远程康复的总体满意度。总体而言,有证据表明患者和康复专业人员对远程康复的满意度高于面对面咨询。