• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《小鼠与文化:关于认知的信念如何影响思维习惯》

Of Mice and Culture: How Beliefs About Knowing Affect Habits of Thinking.

作者信息

Morio Hiroaki, Yeung Saiwing, Peng Kaiping, Yamaguchi Susumu

机构信息

Faculty of Informatics, Kansai University, Osaka, Japan.

Zillow Group, Seattle, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 12;13:917649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917649. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917649
PMID:35959054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9361932/
Abstract

Recent research suggests that individuals from East Asian and Western cultures differ in the degree to which they hold a folk world view known as naïve dialecticism, which is characterized by tolerance for contradiction, expectation of change, and cognitive holism. The current research utilizes the Mouse Paradigm to investigate the dynamic nature of naïve dialecticism in real time by measuring individuals' fluctuations in judgment during the process of contemplation. The results showed cultural differences in dynamic measures of evaluation process: Japanese participants took more time to stabilize their thought and showed more fluctuations in their judgment than American participants. These cultural differences were fully mediated by individual differences in levels of naïve dialecticism as measured by the level of dialectical self-views. Implications for cultural psychology and the psychology of dialectical thinking are discussed.

摘要

最近的研究表明,东亚文化和西方文化背景的个体在持有一种被称为朴素辩证主义的民间世界观的程度上存在差异,这种世界观的特点是对矛盾的容忍、对变化的预期和认知整体主义。当前的研究利用鼠标范式,通过测量个体在思考过程中判断的波动,实时研究朴素辩证主义的动态本质。结果显示,在评价过程的动态测量中存在文化差异:与美国参与者相比,日本参与者需要更长时间来稳定他们的思维,并且在判断上表现出更多的波动。这些文化差异完全由辩证自我观水平所衡量的朴素辩证主义水平的个体差异所介导。文中还讨论了对文化心理学和辩证思维心理学的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3b4/9361932/e228adadd1d1/fpsyg-13-917649-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3b4/9361932/f1d8bf1e206a/fpsyg-13-917649-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3b4/9361932/e228adadd1d1/fpsyg-13-917649-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3b4/9361932/f1d8bf1e206a/fpsyg-13-917649-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3b4/9361932/e228adadd1d1/fpsyg-13-917649-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Of Mice and Culture: How Beliefs About Knowing Affect Habits of Thinking.《小鼠与文化:关于认知的信念如何影响思维习惯》
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 12;13:917649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917649. eCollection 2022.
2
The role of dialecticism in objective and subjective attitudinal ambivalence.辩证论在客观和主观态度矛盾中的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jul;61(3):826-841. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12504. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
3
The dialectical self-concept: contradiction, change, and holism in East asian cultures.辩证自我概念:东亚文化中的矛盾、变化与整体性
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;35(1):29-44. doi: 10.1177/0146167208325772.
4
Cultural differences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: a decade of empirical research.文化差异对变化的期望和对矛盾的容忍度:十年的实证研究。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;14(3):296-312. doi: 10.1177/1088868310362982. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
5
Dialectical self-esteem and East-West differences in psychological well-being.辩证自尊与东西方心理健康差异。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Nov;30(11):1416-32. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264243.
6
Cultural Differences in Attitudes Toward Action and Inaction: The Role of Dialecticism.对行动与无为态度的文化差异:辩证思维的作用
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2013 Sep;4(5):521-528. doi: 10.1177/1948550612468774. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
7
Dialectical Versus Linear Thinking Shapes People's Anticipation of Climate Change.辩证思维与线性思维塑造人们对气候变化的预期。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 20;11:623591. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.623591. eCollection 2020.
8
Self-consistency in Bicultural Persons: Dialectical Self-beliefs Mediate the Relation between Identity Integration and Self-consistency.双文化个体的自我一致性:辩证自我信念介导身份整合与自我一致性之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 7;8:321. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00321. eCollection 2017.
9
Language and the bicultural dialectical self.语言与双文化辩证自我。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2011 Apr;17(2):211-6. doi: 10.1037/a0023686.
10
I am against us? Unpacking cultural differences in ingroup favoritism via dialecticism.我是反对我们吗?通过辩证主义来剖析群体内偏爱中的文化差异。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Jan;37(1):15-27. doi: 10.1177/0146167210388193. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing Negative Attitudes Toward Immigrants in Russia and Taiwan: Possible Beneficial Effects of Naïve Dialecticism and an Incremental Worldview.减少俄罗斯和台湾地区对移民的负面态度:朴素辩证主义和渐进世界观可能产生的有益影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 11;11:572386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572386. eCollection 2020.
2
Culture and personality revisited: Behavioral profiles and within-person stability in interdependent (vs. independent) social orientation and holistic (vs. analytic) cognitive style.文化与人格的再探讨:相互依存(vs.独立)的社会取向和整体(vs.分析)认知风格的行为特征和个体内稳定性。
J Pers. 2020 Oct;88(5):908-924. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12536. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
3
Is positive emotion an amplifier or a buffer? It depends: Dialectical thinking moderates the impact of positive emotion on intergroup conflicts.
积极情绪是放大器还是缓冲器?这取决于:辩证思维调节积极情绪对群体间冲突的影响。
Emotion. 2020 Jun;20(4):700-712. doi: 10.1037/emo0000572. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
4
Cultural Differences in Attitudes Toward Action and Inaction: The Role of Dialecticism.对行动与无为态度的文化差异:辩证思维的作用
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2013 Sep;4(5):521-528. doi: 10.1177/1948550612468774. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
5
Self-other agreement in personality traits and profiles across cultures: A multirater, multiscale study in Blacks and Whites in South Africa.跨文化背景下人格特质和类型的自我-他人一致性:南非黑人和白人的多评估者、多尺度研究。
J Pers. 2018 Dec;86(6):935-951. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12367. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
6
Dialectical thinking and fairness-based perspectives of affirmative action.辩证思维与基于公平的平权行动观点。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 May;102(5):782-801. doi: 10.1037/apl0000207. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
Personality and behavior prediction and consistency across cultures: A multimethod study of Blacks and Whites in South Africa.人格与行为在跨文化中的预测与一致性:南非黑人和白人的多方法研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Mar;114(3):465-481. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000129. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
8
Culture and group-based emotions: could group-based emotions be dialectical?文化与基于群体的情感:基于群体的情感会是辩证的吗?
Cogn Emot. 2017 Aug;31(5):937-949. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1185394. Epub 2016 May 25.
9
Wanting to maximize the positive and minimize the negative: implications for mixed affective experience in American and Chinese contexts.追求积极体验最大化与消极体验最小化:美中语境下混合情感体验的影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Aug;109(2):292-315. doi: 10.1037/a0039276. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
10
The role of dialectical self and bicultural identity integration in psychological adjustment.辩证自我和双文化认同整合在心理调节中的作用。
J Pers. 2013 Feb;81(1):61-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00791.x. Epub 2013 Jan 2.