Bekele Daniel Mengistu, Goshu Dejuma Yadeta, Yalew Alemayehu Worku, Higgins Melinda K, Gary Rebecca A
Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Integr Blood Press Control. 2022 Aug 5;15:81-96. doi: 10.2147/IBPC.S370838. eCollection 2022.
Accurate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk appraisal is essential for hypertensive patients to identify correctly their risk status and take efficient behavioral measures timely to avoid major adverse outcomes. However, hypertensive patients' risk perceptions of CVD events in Ethiopia are unknown. Thus, the study aimed to compare the subjective CVD risk perception level of patients with the nonlaboratory Framingham Risk Score (nl-FRS).
A cross-sectional design was used. The Attitudes and Beliefs about Cardiovascular Disease Risk Questionnaire and the nl-FRS were used to compare subjective versus objective measures of CVD risk. Agreement between participants' risk perceptions and the nl-FRS were examined using the kappa statistic. Bivariate chi-square test and multinomial logistic regression analyses were run to identify factors associated with risk perceptions. The statistical significance was set at a p-value < 0.05 level.
Participants (n=377) had a mean age of 53.61 ± 12.80-years, range (18-82 years), 51.2% were males, 42.7% had less than high school education, 45.1% achieved target BP control, and mean HTN duration was 8.01 ± 6.07 years. The majority (58.62%) of the participants had a low subjective risk perception of CVD events (mean 17.79, 95% CI: 17.43-18.15). Approximately three-fourths (72.4%) had a moderate nl-FRS risk calculation (mean, 13.84, 95% CI: 13.36-14.33). Agreement between participants perceived-risk and the nl-FRS was poor (kappa = 0.0002, standard error = 0.023, p =0.99). Participants' CVD risk-perception inaccuracy was also high (76%) primarily due to underestimation. Hypertension duration, frequency of physician visits, and level of diabetes control were significant predictors of CVD risk underestimation.
Hypertensive patients had inaccurate and low subjective risk perceptions of CVD events compared to moderate objective risks identified using the nl-FRS. Planned education on HTN and CVD risk factors is essential to improve patients' CVD risk perception to reduce adverse CVD events.
准确的心血管疾病(CVD)风险评估对于高血压患者正确识别其风险状况并及时采取有效的行为措施以避免重大不良后果至关重要。然而,埃塞俄比亚高血压患者对CVD事件的风险认知尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在比较患者主观的CVD风险认知水平与非实验室Framingham风险评分(nl-FRS)。
采用横断面设计。使用心血管疾病风险的态度和信念问卷以及nl-FRS来比较CVD风险的主观与客观测量。使用kappa统计量检查参与者的风险认知与nl-FRS之间的一致性。进行双变量卡方检验和多项逻辑回归分析以确定与风险认知相关的因素。统计学显著性设定为p值<0.05水平。
参与者(n = 377)的平均年龄为53.61±12.80岁,范围为(18 - 82岁),51.2%为男性,42.7%的受教育程度低于高中,45.1%实现了血压控制目标,平均高血压病程为8.01±6.07年。大多数(58.62%)参与者对CVD事件的主观风险认知较低(平均17.79,95%置信区间:17.43 - 18.15)。约四分之三(72.4%)的nl-FRS风险计算为中度(平均,13.84,95%置信区间:13.36 - 14.33)。参与者的感知风险与nl-FRS之间的一致性较差(kappa = 0.0002,标准误 = 0.023,p = 0.99)。参与者的CVD风险认知不准确程度也很高(76%),主要是由于低估。高血压病程、就诊频率和糖尿病控制水平是CVD风险低估的显著预测因素。
与使用nl-FRS确定的中度客观风险相比,高血压患者对CVD事件的主观风险认知不准确且较低。有计划地开展关于高血压和CVD危险因素的教育对于提高患者的CVD风险认知以减少不良CVD事件至关重要。